Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

What is something you know because of your job, that would surprise others? (My example is gross, thread warning!)

760 replies

Mrmen1100 · 10/05/2026 19:24

It can be anything!!

I will start..

I am a food safety inspector (local authority) and have been for over 15 years, working in two large cities, and my current job in a smaller local authority. The same theme...

Food handlers do NOT wash their hands properly after using the toilet / before preparing your food.. lack of antibacterial soap in a toilet cubicle or in a kitchen is common place.... even when I am there, hands are not washed, it is an absolute bug bear of mine.

Preparing with raw meat then handling food ready to eat.. not uncommon

Handling cash / touching screens then handling food.. not uncommon.

Yes it does put me off eating outside of my house unfortunately 🙃

I have come across a LOT worse but this example irritates me.

Your turn!!!!!

OP posts:
godmum56 · 18/05/2026 18:59

Gloriousgardener11 · 18/05/2026 17:55

Wow !
And we all stood outside and clapped for this. 🙄

Working in the NHS doesn't automatically make you an angel, doesn't make you honest or even particularly nice. They are employers like any other employer, you get good, bad and indifferent.

wanttoworkbut · 18/05/2026 19:13

CDTC · 17/05/2026 10:41

My brother worked for the council and he got a warning because he screwed in two loose screws on a door handle and changed a lightbulb. They were paying a £50 call out fee for every single thing in that building so for those two 'jobs' he saved them upwards of £100 but almost got fired for it.

Thats privatisation for you, 'corportae landlord' contracts. Pressure from government to contract out/PFI everything cos the private sector is more efficient innit.

godmum56 · 18/05/2026 20:38

wanttoworkbut · 18/05/2026 19:13

Thats privatisation for you, 'corportae landlord' contracts. Pressure from government to contract out/PFI everything cos the private sector is more efficient innit.

you might find its because it invalidates their insurance to have a non certificated workman doing even small jobs.

TheignT · 18/05/2026 20:48

Lollygaggle · 16/05/2026 19:20

Unless they sacked all the staff , sold the building of course there would still be costs . Private dentists were entitled to no help from government at all.

As I’ve said before I’m massively surprised they were closed for so long. For the vast majority of practices they were open but restricted in what they could do because of all the cross infection control so eg routine check ups , scaling were cancelled because it took so long to treat people who had problems. By the time you had gowned up , set up surgery , done treatment which took much longer in all the PPE , scrubbed down then left the room fallow for 30 minutes to an hour , instead of maybe seeing 25 to 30 people a day you were seeing 6 to 8 and utterly exhausted afterwards .

You ignored the onesided bit. I paid my full subscriptions for 18 months and when I finally get a checkup the first thing that's said isn't "thanks for your support for the past 18 months" no it's "you need to pay £15 for PPE.

By the way dental staff could be furloughed in COVID like any other staff so why would they need to sack staff?

Lollygaggle · 18/05/2026 20:52

TheignT · 18/05/2026 20:48

You ignored the onesided bit. I paid my full subscriptions for 18 months and when I finally get a checkup the first thing that's said isn't "thanks for your support for the past 18 months" no it's "you need to pay £15 for PPE.

By the way dental staff could be furloughed in COVID like any other staff so why would they need to sack staff?

Only employed staff could be furloughed, the dentists, therapists , hygienists are self employed so couldn’t be furloughed .

But that still wouldn’t cover the mortgage, borrowing costs of equipment , rates etc that still had to be paid and dental practices (private ones) were entitled to no help with costs that still had to be paid. www.ashfords.co.uk/insights/articles/dentists-in-financial-difficulty

nearlylovemyusername · 18/05/2026 20:59

Thundertoast · 11/05/2026 12:59

How much everything you see on social media and parts of the wider internet, is a bubble created by algorithms based off data its collecting about you and your online habits designed to hold your attention and keep clicking. I would love to see a public information campaign about this, honestly, as I dont blame people for not being aware but it affects us all!

How many fake bot accounts there are and just how real the people behind them can make them seem. The true scale of misinformation campaigns by Russia alone is fascinating, and so many people have no idea this stuff is real! Lots of fake accounts that are not obviously fake at all. Social engineering is very good these days. Contributing to the algorithm by posting about the same thing. Contributing to false information that is then scraped a regurgitated by shoddy 'news' sources and AI.

I work in a very interesting but horrifying field!

I'm not far from this area as well.

Do you believe the level of manipulation and malice will be exposed at some stage?

Do you know how much Russia is involved with constant rotation of our PMs?

XenoBitch · 18/05/2026 21:06

AllyMacbealmyarse · 17/05/2026 12:29

But a prescription charge isn’t for your particular meds, it’s a contribution towards then nhs. Otherwise you’d be paying very little for something cheap and the pricing of an expensive med would be out of reach.

Yep, DM was on a daily medication for 3 months that cost £400 per tablet.
Imagine handing that over in your local pharmacy.

wanttoworkbut · 18/05/2026 21:10

godmum56 · 18/05/2026 20:38

you might find its because it invalidates their insurance to have a non certificated workman doing even small jobs.

Non certificated? Public sector used to, and still should, employ suitably trained, qualified or supervised staff. Along with risk assessments and health and safety policies, of course they should be able to carry out work on their own premises. The private sector isn't automatically somehow employing different roles.

godmum56 · 18/05/2026 21:16

wanttoworkbut · 18/05/2026 21:10

Non certificated? Public sector used to, and still should, employ suitably trained, qualified or supervised staff. Along with risk assessments and health and safety policies, of course they should be able to carry out work on their own premises. The private sector isn't automatically somehow employing different roles.

but the poster didn't say her brother was certificated to do that kind of work?

60andcounting · 18/05/2026 22:11

nearlylovemyusername · 18/05/2026 20:59

I'm not far from this area as well.

Do you believe the level of manipulation and malice will be exposed at some stage?

Do you know how much Russia is involved with constant rotation of our PMs?

Is Russia really involved in UK politics? I keep hearing this and wonder if it's true?

nearlylovemyusername · 18/05/2026 23:01

60andcounting · 18/05/2026 22:11

Is Russia really involved in UK politics? I keep hearing this and wonder if it's true?

Russia is very much involved and not in UK only, but France, Germany etc.
AfD was largely established by Russia, not openly of course, Le Pen is funded by Putin directly.
Russia was involved with Brexit, they are behind the rise of Reform.
They do it in a very sophisticated way, through SM mainly. Even here on MN it's pretty easy to spot Russian trolls.

60andcounting · 19/05/2026 11:01

nearlylovemyusername · 18/05/2026 23:01

Russia is very much involved and not in UK only, but France, Germany etc.
AfD was largely established by Russia, not openly of course, Le Pen is funded by Putin directly.
Russia was involved with Brexit, they are behind the rise of Reform.
They do it in a very sophisticated way, through SM mainly. Even here on MN it's pretty easy to spot Russian trolls.

Thanks.
Easy for you to spot, not so much me.

oncemoreuntothebeachdearfriends · 19/05/2026 11:53

60andcounting · 19/05/2026 11:01

Thanks.
Easy for you to spot, not so much me.

Are they the posts with the little red flags ? 😀

TheignT · 19/05/2026 19:33

Lollygaggle · 18/05/2026 20:52

Only employed staff could be furloughed, the dentists, therapists , hygienists are self employed so couldn’t be furloughed .

But that still wouldn’t cover the mortgage, borrowing costs of equipment , rates etc that still had to be paid and dental practices (private ones) were entitled to no help with costs that still had to be paid. www.ashfords.co.uk/insights/articles/dentists-in-financial-difficulty

Edited

No not all are self employed. The hygienist I see is employed, we had a chat about it and she found the attitude of take take take embarrassing.

You still can't explain why it was up to me to pay towards the other things and then not even get a thanks for your support. I guess it is down to good manners and not everyone has them. Other businesses had costs did you feel the need to pay them as if you were getting normal service?

Lollygaggle · 19/05/2026 19:42

TheignT · 19/05/2026 19:33

No not all are self employed. The hygienist I see is employed, we had a chat about it and she found the attitude of take take take embarrassing.

You still can't explain why it was up to me to pay towards the other things and then not even get a thanks for your support. I guess it is down to good manners and not everyone has them. Other businesses had costs did you feel the need to pay them as if you were getting normal service?

Very unusual for a hygienist in practice to be employed, 73% are self employed and the majority that are employed are employed in hospital, community , armed services or prison, very , very few are employed in general practice .

I can’t speak for what happened in your practice but it would seem to be very,very far from the norm for what happened in the vast majority of practices in the U.K. as you have seen from my other posts , links I have provided and from my own personal experience both working all throughout that time and running a support network for local practices working during that time.

awfulapril · 19/05/2026 19:45

We know you're using chat gpt for your emails parents of school children

yes we judge you.

no we don't treat all your kids the same (if one's badly behaved)

but omg you get better service if you're polite to us.

godmum56 · 19/05/2026 21:00

awfulapril · 19/05/2026 19:45

We know you're using chat gpt for your emails parents of school children

yes we judge you.

no we don't treat all your kids the same (if one's badly behaved)

but omg you get better service if you're polite to us.

but omg you get better service if you're polite to us.

but surely that is universal?

awfulapril · 19/05/2026 21:38

You'd think people would clock that. Not parents

Whyarepeople · 20/05/2026 08:58

60andcounting · 18/05/2026 22:11

Is Russia really involved in UK politics? I keep hearing this and wonder if it's true?

All major countries are involved in each others' politics. They spy on each other, influence each other, cause disruption etc, in the hopes of moving things in whatever direction suits them.

It's the modern day version of invasion and colonisation, which Britain did with great energy and enthusiasm for a long time.

JumpLeadsForTwo · 20/05/2026 09:51

Whyarepeople · 20/05/2026 08:58

All major countries are involved in each others' politics. They spy on each other, influence each other, cause disruption etc, in the hopes of moving things in whatever direction suits them.

It's the modern day version of invasion and colonisation, which Britain did with great energy and enthusiasm for a long time.

Who do you think are the major players in terms of influencing UK politics - Russia/ China/ US? Also who do the UK have the most influence with.

Whyarepeople · 20/05/2026 10:51

JumpLeadsForTwo · 20/05/2026 09:51

Who do you think are the major players in terms of influencing UK politics - Russia/ China/ US? Also who do the UK have the most influence with.

The UK and the US have a 'special relationship' formed after WWII with a complex set of agreements around how they deal with each other and how they support each other. They share intelligence and have various agreements around conflicts etc - of course, if a certain president decides he doesn't want to honour any of that, there's a big open question about what happens then.

Apart from that, I don't know. Countries are always interested in threats and opportunities - who could we trade with? Who could cut off certain supplies? Who could kill us? There's a lot of dealing and compromise that goes on in the background as well as attempts to get one over on each other. Every country tries to pull strings in other countries. Whether it works out the way they want it to seems to be a matter of chance really.

I find the whole thing stupid tbh - history has shown over and over and over that interfering in other countries never works out well and yet it still happens. Lack of trust is the fundamental issue - the sense the everyone is trying to get ahead, screw others etc. Because men run most things they'll always view everything in terms of conflict and competition rather than realising what a waste of time most of it is.

TheignT · 20/05/2026 11:47

Lollygaggle · 19/05/2026 19:42

Very unusual for a hygienist in practice to be employed, 73% are self employed and the majority that are employed are employed in hospital, community , armed services or prison, very , very few are employed in general practice .

I can’t speak for what happened in your practice but it would seem to be very,very far from the norm for what happened in the vast majority of practices in the U.K. as you have seen from my other posts , links I have provided and from my own personal experience both working all throughout that time and running a support network for local practices working during that time.

I checked two local chains that operate locally, both directly employ hygienists. Doesn't seem that rare.

Lollygaggle · 20/05/2026 12:04

TheignT · 20/05/2026 11:47

I checked two local chains that operate locally, both directly employ hygienists. Doesn't seem that rare.

https://www.gdc-uk.org/docs/default-source/reports-and-publications/working-patterns-data/dental-hygienists-inferential-analysis-report-300725-(version-published-july-2025).pdf?sfvrsn=4e4e0e0b5

here’s the figures, page 8 73% self employed I am surprised that practices breached confidentiality by telling you hygienists employment status and very surprised as chains are the least likely to employ hygienists due to them then being liable for holiday/ sick/training pay etc and difficult in terms of productivity etc here’s the job advert for the largest dental corporate in the country…. Self employed hygienists https://www.mydentist.co.uk/careers/clinical-jobs/dental-hygienists

If you asked at reception I’m sure they receptionists were just telling you they have hygienists , they would not be aware of the terms of their contract.

https://www.gdc-uk.org/docs/default-source/reports-and-publications/working-patterns-data/dental-hygienists-inferential-analysis-report-300725-(version-published-july-2025).pdf?sfvrsn=4e4e0e0b_5

WearyAuldWumman · 20/05/2026 12:51

TheignT · 20/05/2026 11:47

I checked two local chains that operate locally, both directly employ hygienists. Doesn't seem that rare.

Our practice employed their hygienist. She chose to leave and they've been unable to replace her.

Kadiofakit · 20/05/2026 13:51

How on earth would you know or care weather your hygienist was self employed or employed by your dentist and why does it matter? Does it mean hairdressers are also always employed because they cut your hair in a certain salon? or perhaps they are renting their place in that salon eg. being self employed?

Why argue on a thread like this, when people giving experiences from THEIR work?