Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Why are there so many SUV's on the road?

287 replies

Sausagenbacon · 25/04/2026 19:19

I've just had a wonderful cycle ride (we used to cycle a lot during lockdown but not since).
We really noticed how busy the roads were, which was unsurprising, but we also noticed that most people drive suv's now, which is a pita.
Why is this, and how do people afford them?

OP posts:
Amodernhistory · 25/04/2026 23:44

A higher proportion of people than you think are morons who like inconveniencing everyone else and putting others at risk with their massive cars

Pedallleur · Yesterday 00:02

Perceived as safer yet estate cars often have bigger load capacity and lower rear hatch. Bigger profits for the manufacturer.

Bigwelshlamb · Yesterday 00:03

MikeRafone · 25/04/2026 22:46

if you drive, surely you’ve read the Highway Code and know what the rules are? You would have been tested on the Highway Code for a uk driving licence

you drive or someone drives you, to satisfy your hobby, using public roads are for everyone to use for whichever purpose they wish.

Yea like I said, crack on and knock yourself out, I just don't get it. And no, I've no clue about the rules for push bikes because I don't ride them and my kids only ride them on tracks and such. Logically riding two abreast isn't ok but I have no idea if truth be told. Would it make any difference to my life to know it? I wonder if my license should be revoked because I don't know this? I've only been driving 40 years with one accident when someone drove into me but I'm sure there's somewhere you can report my misdemeanor and have me struck off for giving absolutely no fucks about what anyone else thinks about my large car choice 😁

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Gealach · Yesterday 00:46

I have one so I can carry a rake of kids around with me. Handy for that.

Otherwise I agree either with you. We’re not set up for them. When I’m not sharing lifts to matches ect… I’ll be back in a small car.

MikeRafone · Yesterday 06:18

Bigwelshlamb · Yesterday 00:03

Yea like I said, crack on and knock yourself out, I just don't get it. And no, I've no clue about the rules for push bikes because I don't ride them and my kids only ride them on tracks and such. Logically riding two abreast isn't ok but I have no idea if truth be told. Would it make any difference to my life to know it? I wonder if my license should be revoked because I don't know this? I've only been driving 40 years with one accident when someone drove into me but I'm sure there's somewhere you can report my misdemeanor and have me struck off for giving absolutely no fucks about what anyone else thinks about my large car choice 😁

Edited

IMO this is the real problem, drivers having no idea about the Highway Code and not giving a fuck they don’t know the rules. If you don’t know this fuck knows what else you don’t know and you could well put someone else life in danger due to your lack of knowledge.

bugalugs45 · Yesterday 06:41

crackofdoom · 25/04/2026 19:41

Because safer for you = less safe for everyone else. (By which I mean other road users and pedestrians). And people don't tend to like selfish wankers who put their lives at risk.

Hth.

Why are they less safe for everyone else ? Or is that just your opinion based on absolutely nothing except jealousy perhaps ? 🤔

bugalugs45 · Yesterday 06:51

Sausagenbacon · 25/04/2026 20:07

I think that the answer seems to boil down to howe selfish you are.
We took our 3 children to France in a Nova, and it was no problem at all.
And, for those asking why they are a PITA, just try cycling. They take up a disproportionate amount of road, but the owners don't care (as evidenced by this thread).

A nova? My brother had one of those as his first car in the 90s , didn’t even realise they existed anymore .
But realistically an SUV would be more comfortable, more room for luggage and I’m guessing safer in event of an accident , as any newer car would be .
But you do you . A car like a house is very much a personal choice & you pay for what you decide. Someone else’s car is not your business

OneTimeThingToday · Yesterday 07:12

Bigwelshlamb · Yesterday 00:03

Yea like I said, crack on and knock yourself out, I just don't get it. And no, I've no clue about the rules for push bikes because I don't ride them and my kids only ride them on tracks and such. Logically riding two abreast isn't ok but I have no idea if truth be told. Would it make any difference to my life to know it? I wonder if my license should be revoked because I don't know this? I've only been driving 40 years with one accident when someone drove into me but I'm sure there's somewhere you can report my misdemeanor and have me struck off for giving absolutely no fucks about what anyone else thinks about my large car choice 😁

Edited

Passing cyclists is in the Highway Code for drivers, not just cyclists.

That rule being you have to give them the same space as a car while passing, so its rarely safe to pass one if you cant over take two abreast, as you need to basically be on the opposite side of the road.

SOME cyclists are annoying (like the ones who like to struggle uphill on the main road out of our village, at around 15mph on a 50mph road, despite the lovely wide cycle path to the side of the road... which never has potatoes on like the road)
SOME drivers are annoying.
SOME tractors are annoying ( like the ones who drop potatoes over said road!)

But basically... all are entitled to use the road.

lovealieinortwo · Yesterday 07:12

Pedallleur · Yesterday 00:02

Perceived as safer yet estate cars often have bigger load capacity and lower rear hatch. Bigger profits for the manufacturer.

My parents had the Classic Volvo estate, that was massive & way bigger than any other car I’ve had.

Backawayfromthesausage · Yesterday 07:14

bugalugs45 · Yesterday 06:51

A nova? My brother had one of those as his first car in the 90s , didn’t even realise they existed anymore .
But realistically an SUV would be more comfortable, more room for luggage and I’m guessing safer in event of an accident , as any newer car would be .
But you do you . A car like a house is very much a personal choice & you pay for what you decide. Someone else’s car is not your business

I think maybe the op is elderly and means a long time ago. As they stopped making the Vauxhall nova in 93.

im not sure of the point she’s making either, 30 years ago SUV’s were much less common,although I don’t think families of five were rushing at the nova, which would have been cramped as fuck for the kids.

mypantsareonfire · Yesterday 07:18

QueenofFox · 25/04/2026 19:35

Such a pain, take up too much of the road, can’t see around them as a pedestrian or cyclist and just impossible to get past when all Parker

I can assure you, my 12 year old estate is far longer, wider and more of a pain in the arse than a newer SUV.

lovealieinortwo · Yesterday 07:20

@Orangebadger why do you think all SUVs are bigger than your estate?

lovealieinortwo · Yesterday 07:21

mypantsareonfire · Yesterday 07:18

I can assure you, my 12 year old estate is far longer, wider and more of a pain in the arse than a newer SUV.

I really think many posters just don’t understand what an SUV is

bugalugs45 · Yesterday 07:23

Also Google just told me that the top selling 3 new cars in the UK are all ( crossover ) SUVS, and have been for several years so guess there’s more lovers than haters out there .

RampantIvy · Yesterday 07:25

CheeseNPickle3 · 25/04/2026 19:34

Because there are relatively few estate car options now so if you want something bigger than a hatchback then you're more likely buying an SUV.

I agree. I need the space for moving student DD between rental properties.

Callmeback · Yesterday 07:26

RampantIvy · Yesterday 07:25

I agree. I need the space for moving student DD between rental properties.

No you don't. So moving once a year? Van hire would be far cheaper.

Kpo58 · Yesterday 07:27

bugalugs45 · Yesterday 06:41

Why are they less safe for everyone else ? Or is that just your opinion based on absolutely nothing except jealousy perhaps ? 🤔

Several reasons.

Most SUVs are so huge that children cannot see over or around them which makes crossing the road more difficult and dangerous.

Because they are so much wider (even than a van), it is much harder for a pedestrian to get out of their way on a single track road because they can take up almost all the road instead of 2/3rds of it

Because the are much higher, if a pedestrian is hit by one, their head is far more likely to be hit, so they are more likely to die or have catastrophic brain injuries than with a normal car.

Backawayfromthesausage · Yesterday 07:28

Callmeback · Yesterday 07:26

No you don't. So moving once a year? Van hire would be far cheaper.

Thing is you don’t get to dictate how others spend their money they earn. Just saying.

Benvenuto · Yesterday 07:28

HorrorPudding · 25/04/2026 19:58

Surely what really matters is how any car is driven (from a cyclist’s point of view) rather than the type of car? Obviously a bigger car being driven dangerously is potentially more damaging. I cycle and ride horses and I’ve certainly been on the receiving end of some dangerous and inconsiderate driving but that’s generally been from idiots flying around in small hatchbacks or vans.

I have a large 4x4 which I originally got for towing and transporting multiple children. I could downsize now but it’s expensive to change cars and these days I’m grateful for the car’s ability to manage horrendous potholes everywhere. It’s 10 years old and has done 110k miles and is good for many more. It’s a hybrid so I’ll soon be penalised for the electric and the petrol engine, if that makes you feel any better @Sausagenbacon?!

As for SUVs being everywhere, I’m sure that’s true. Manufacturers seem to be moving towards that type of car so I guess it’s what is on offer. I think people also like a slightly higher seating position etc and I suppose for some a particular type of car is a status symbol (in their own tiny minds).

What’s the particular PITA element?

It obviously matters how a car is driven - but SUV bonnets are tall & blunt and are more dangerous in a collision as you are more likely to be dragged under them rather than bounce off them. Traditional cars have lower, angled bonnets.

Callmeback · Yesterday 07:30

Backawayfromthesausage · Yesterday 07:28

Thing is you don’t get to dictate how others spend their money they earn. Just saying.

No but I can challenge fake justification.

Queenhecate · Yesterday 07:34

Callmeback · Yesterday 07:30

No but I can challenge fake justification.

Do you deem my justification acceptable?

Newthreadnewme11 · Yesterday 07:34

LlynTegid · 25/04/2026 19:52

Car finance I think is a major contributor. Also a kind of size race, people would not have them if others didn't.

My solution would be to have SUVs and high performance cars as a separate category of licence. A period of a clean licence before you would be eligible (say five years), higher medical standards (as you do with lorries and buses), and perhaps have to take your theory and maybe practical test again. Even having to take your theory test again would put some people off.

I'd also have higher parking charges (or lower ones for smaller cars) and a much higher taxation of them.

Love this idea and completely agree. We have the smallest SUV there is, pretty much, so can still fit two going past each other on suburban city streets. I absolutely loathe the ones that are so wide only one can fit down at a time and judge the owners

lovealieinortwo · Yesterday 07:36

UK roads are much safer though now vs the past & are some of the safest in the world.

”Throughout the 1920s and ‘30s, between 5,000 and 7,000 people died in road accidents each year”

“Fast-forward to today. Around 1,700 people die in road incidents each year in the UK, about a quarter of the number that used to be. That’s despite there being 16 times more vehicles on the road and 33 times as many miles driven.”

“If road deaths per mile driven were still as high as in 1950, then the UK would not see 1,700 road deaths per year, but 37,000.”

RealityChecksNeeded · Yesterday 07:38

AntiHop · 25/04/2026 19:37

God I hate them. I live in London so there is absolutely no need for them here. They take up so much more space, which is a real problem on London's many Victorian residential streets. They are so much more dangerous to pedestrians. I really worry for my year 6 child walking home from school as they are so huge compared to her.

Before any one bleats on about needing the space. We function fine as a family of 4 with a corsa.

What an idiotic response, of course a Corsa is going to be fine for a family of 4.

We are a family of 9, (most important member ddog included), I own (outright) an 8 seater Landrover Defender and I love it. It's perfect for our needs, is very safe on the road. I know it won't crumple like a tin can in an accident and the luxury aspect is something I want in my car and have always had, meaning I work to afford nice things.

The best part, when I pull up at the lights next to you, I can look down and give you a royal wave.

Does that help?

Backawayfromthesausage · Yesterday 07:39

Callmeback · Yesterday 07:30

No but I can challenge fake justification.

No one needs to justify their choice of car to you.