Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Tourette’s/BAFTAs offensive language

1000 replies

Lochroy · 23/02/2026 16:37

I wasn’t watching, I’ve just read the article on BBC news. I will admit I know little of Tourette’s and therefore posting to understand.

The tics agree involuntary, and often use offensive language. But what I’m struggling to get my head around is excusing use of the N word because it was caused by the disability when it was (seemingly) only directed at black people?

Also presumably it’s learned vocab so children don’t have swear words as tics? How does this develop?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Possiges · 23/02/2026 21:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

BringonSpringnowplease · 23/02/2026 21:17

Surely everyone involved in the awards was well aware that a film centred around someone with Tourette's was a major part of the event.
Doesn't mean you wouldn't be shocked by hearing the slur, but you'd have an idea it wasn't just some random racist.

TheEdenSide · 23/02/2026 21:17

Vivi0 · 23/02/2026 20:38

You’re not sure if he meant it?

He has Tourette’s! Educate yourself.

These ableists and personal victims - who, judging by their posts, must cause harm and distress on a regular basis - are beyond belief and are not fit to shine the shoes of John Davidson

SimpleSingle · 23/02/2026 21:17

Alucard55 · 23/02/2026 21:14

Completely agree. He should have left the room. He may not have control over what he says but in this circumstance he had control over where he said it. He/his wife must have anticipated as 2 black men where being introduced onto the stage that there was a good chance he would shout out something racist.

He could just become a recluse, just to be on the safe side. Then would you be happy?

Livelovebehappy · 23/02/2026 21:17

Alucard55 · 23/02/2026 21:14

Completely agree. He should have left the room. He may not have control over what he says but in this circumstance he had control over where he said it. He/his wife must have anticipated as 2 black men where being introduced onto the stage that there was a good chance he would shout out something racist.

He did leave the room….

MissAustenMadeAQuilt · 23/02/2026 21:18

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 23/02/2026 21:12

No, he absolutely should not be apologising for his disability. I think the meaning of ‘involuntary’ is lost on a few posters. If he apologised for every offensive tic he’d be doing nothing else. In fact in a scene from his earlier documentary when he tic-ed in a shop he did seem extremely embarrassed and was apologise to those in the shop. That was nearly 20 years ago.

To the unpleasant ableist fuckers on this thread away and educate yourself and look up coprolalia
while you’re at it.

I know what coprolalia is

I also know what coprophagia is. It means to eat shit.

There are quite a few posters on this thread who expect black people to eat shit with all this excusing foul racist language. Disgusting.

FrippEnos · 23/02/2026 21:18

Alucard55 · 23/02/2026 21:14

Completely agree. He should have left the room. He may not have control over what he says but in this circumstance he had control over where he said it. He/his wife must have anticipated as 2 black men where being introduced onto the stage that there was a good chance he would shout out something racist.

He did leave the room.

GoingToEgypt · 23/02/2026 21:18

I’m quite horrified by this thread. If I had to ‘pick a side’, I would probably choose JD because of how horrendous his condition is. Must be so so hard.

But I am truly appalled by the casual dismissal on this thread of the impact such a word must have had on the black presenters. Like they had no feelings and don’t deserve to feel upset. Because they are rich??

There is a world of difference between eg the F word and the N word and it’s wilful ignorance to claim otherwise.

I never knew there was so much racism on here - lots of people showing their true colours. I feel those being accused of being ableist are in fact understanding of JD’s condition whereas those supporting JD are just assuming black people should accept the name calling, and their lifelong suffering doesn’t count. How can any of us know which suffering is worse? You can’t minimise the experience of those suffering racism or ableism.

Disgusting behaviour, in my view. Eye-opening.

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 23/02/2026 21:18

MissAustenMadeAQuilt · 23/02/2026 21:18

I know what coprolalia is

I also know what coprophagia is. It means to eat shit.

There are quite a few posters on this thread who expect black people to eat shit with all this excusing foul racist language. Disgusting.

Nobody except you has said such a thing. That's absolutely disgusting.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 23/02/2026 21:19

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You do realise people can feel empathy for the actors yet still not feel John Davidson needs to apologise for his disability. That’s not making excuses, it’s understanding Tourette’s and all that it entails, which you clearly don’t. The information is out there but you’d rather play Oppression Olympics. The two opinions can co-exist.

SimpleSingle · 23/02/2026 21:19

Another interesting thing I’ve seen posted by some Americans is that the slur is worse because he used a “hard r”. Emmmm, that’s the Scottish accent!!!

SpaceRaccoon · 23/02/2026 21:19

RoastBanana · 23/02/2026 21:16

So what I’m taking from this thread is that black people are expected to just smile & go on their way when they are on the receiving end of racial slurs shouted at them by strangers?

That it’s not legitimate for them to be hurt? That, in fact, their distress and anger is itself discriminatory and self-indulgent?

That it’s unreasonable for them to expect these slurs not to be broadcast - knowingly, and by choice - to millions of people?

That if a black woman, say, an ordinary black woman, not a famous woman, just someone on her way to Tesco perhaps, was to be shouted at this way in the street by a stranger with Tourette’s, and subsequently was to feel too humiliated and afraid to leave her home, that would be her being selfish - & she’d need to ‘educate herself’?

I feel sorry for this man. I don’t think he was intentionally racist. (I have not seen his apology so cannot comment on it.) His life must have been very difficult. But that absolutely does not mean we should pretend that black people have to accept, & not object to, or be hurt by, racial insults from strangers.

I smell the normalisation of racial insults here. The requirement that black people ‘put up and shut up’. ‘Unreasonable to complain.’ ‘What a fuss.’

It’s really repulsive - and yes, I think too many pp above are shockingly, appallingly, shamefully dismissive of the reality of race discrimination.

Ironically, I suspect the people pushing this line are really not helping this particular man by enlisting him in this cause. Maybe he doesn’t actually want to be the public face of the ‘It’s ok to shout insults at black people ’ movement? Maybe he’s not actually a racist who thinks black people need to put up and shut up? Maybe think about that just a bit?

It gets trickier than that though. What if you're a black woman with tourettes shouting racial slurs at Asians, for instance? Where do you stand on that?

x.com/KingBobIIV/status/2026042145707094188

callmeLoretta1 · 23/02/2026 21:20

DotAndCarryOne2 · 23/02/2026 21:12

I don’t think the people supporting JD are racist or bigoted, or that they need educating. If course intent matters. If someone has no control over their words, as with Tourette’s there is no intent to cause offence, so no reason to take offence. Why do the feelings of one cohort of society take precedence over that of another ?

I don't know how many times I have to say this. But the impact, impact on my community of that word is the SAME. Regardless of intent. This should be understandable, it's ridiculous I have to keep explaining the same thing. It should be common sense.

Why do the feelings of one cohort of society take precedence over that of another ?

That, is EXACTLY the point we black people on this thread are making. Why do OUR feelings not count at all?

Possiges · 23/02/2026 21:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 23/02/2026 21:20

MissAustenMadeAQuilt · 23/02/2026 21:18

I know what coprolalia is

I also know what coprophagia is. It means to eat shit.

There are quite a few posters on this thread who expect black people to eat shit with all this excusing foul racist language. Disgusting.

What is to talk shit? You appear to be up on that.

MissAustenMadeAQuilt · 23/02/2026 21:21

Is it!
It is the same root. One means to say it and another means to eat it.

I am suggesting that some apologists on this thread expect black people to metaphorically eat shit by giving this individual a free pass both for saying it and then not issuing an apology and if you think that statement of his is an apology, then I have a bridge to seel you!

SimpleSingle · 23/02/2026 21:21

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 23/02/2026 21:19

You do realise people can feel empathy for the actors yet still not feel John Davidson needs to apologise for his disability. That’s not making excuses, it’s understanding Tourette’s and all that it entails, which you clearly don’t. The information is out there but you’d rather play Oppression Olympics. The two opinions can co-exist.

I would be upset if he did apologise. No fault lies with him. And the previous poster who likened it to apologising for running over someone’s foot - that’s an accident, but technically it’s an action that could be avoided. John has no way of controlling or avoiding his Tourette’s.

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 23/02/2026 21:22

SimpleSingle · 23/02/2026 21:21

I would be upset if he did apologise. No fault lies with him. And the previous poster who likened it to apologising for running over someone’s foot - that’s an accident, but technically it’s an action that could be avoided. John has no way of controlling or avoiding his Tourette’s.

Completely agree.

DotAndCarryOne2 · 23/02/2026 21:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You know nothing about my character, but your posts say plenty about yours - namely that you have no idea what Tourette’s or Coprolalia actually is and have no intention of finding out because it suits your agenda. If he had shouted umbrella, he wouldn’t be suffering from Tourette’s. The point here is that with Coprolalia the brain works in a way which, when triggered, prompts the sufferer to shout out the most offensive word connected with that trigger. There is no intent to cause offence and therefore no need to apologise. Unless of course you think that disabled people should routinely apologise for being disabled - because essentially that’s what you’re saying. His disability says nothing about his character because it is totally separate from the person he is.

callmeLoretta1 · 23/02/2026 21:22

Vivi0 · 23/02/2026 21:13

I have every empathy for people with Tourettes

Do you?

Is that empathy here with us on the thread?

Is your empathy for black people here with us on this thread?

YellingAway · 23/02/2026 21:22

This is one of the worst threads I have read on mumsnet in a long time.

Many people in the UK are familiar with John’s story and have a lot of sympathy for the difficult life he has led. Last night should have been a real highlight in that he was able to take his story to a wider audience but as a result of his disability ended up saying a terrible rascist word. Anyone who is vaguely familiar with his story will know the pain he is going through today.

Of course it was an awful word and terrible for those poor actors on stage to hear that called out, but once explained to them, if they had any ounce of human compassion would understand.

This thread has actually called for him to not be allowed out due to his disability which goes back to those terrible times when disabled people were shameful and to be hidden from society. Are posters who purport to be speaking for the black community really saying this given the very recent segregation they endured. Shameful all round.

SpaceRaccoon · 23/02/2026 21:23

An apology is also pointless because it's the admission of a wrong, with the understood intent that you won't do it again.

John will do this again and again and again. Because he has a lifelong neurological condition. And he's not doing anything wrong, he's exhibiting symptoms of that condition.

PeonyPatch · 23/02/2026 21:23

Are we at risk of stigmatising someone with Tourette’s here?

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 23/02/2026 21:23

MissAustenMadeAQuilt · 23/02/2026 21:21

Is it!
It is the same root. One means to say it and another means to eat it.

I am suggesting that some apologists on this thread expect black people to metaphorically eat shit by giving this individual a free pass both for saying it and then not issuing an apology and if you think that statement of his is an apology, then I have a bridge to seel you!

What part of He Has Tourette’s don’t you understand. Well, Tourette’s in general clearly.

Jimmyneutronsforehead · 23/02/2026 21:23

SimpleSingle · 23/02/2026 21:21

I would be upset if he did apologise. No fault lies with him. And the previous poster who likened it to apologising for running over someone’s foot - that’s an accident, but technically it’s an action that could be avoided. John has no way of controlling or avoiding his Tourette’s.

Yes people seem to be forgetting that he has no control. There aren't tools or disability aids for Tourettes. It absolutely ruins your life.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread