If you had became a parent at the same age your mother would have been when she had you , how old would you have been?

[OneUmberJoker]

31 ...

DM -26 nearly 27
Me - Just 28

I am the eldest

Weird question. The more interesting answer is

my mum was 25 when I was born. I was 36 when DS1 was born. He’s 17 now, so if I’d had him at 25 he’d be 28 now - which blows my mind as it’s such a huge gap. I would be 53 yrs old with a 28 yr old son, rather than a 17 yr old.

17

38

34 but 35 9 days later.

I was 32

I was the same age as my mum when she had me and the same age as my grandmother when she had my mum. I'm not saying specific age but all in our twenties and all first (or only) children. So no upward trend at all here.

Is this asking how old was your mum when she had you?

28

DM -26 nearly 27
Me - Just 28

I am the eldest of my siblings.

37 - always thought she was a really old mum when I was young! Had a baby at 37 too 🤣

my mum had me at 24 and I had my first at 19

My aunt was 19 when she had her first and my mum was 40 with me. I thought my aunt was so cool and glam and vowed to have a baby by 19... I was 33 😆
Aunt is now 80 and still cool and glam ❤️

My mother was 25 when she had me. I was 21 when I became a parent for the first time.

29

The horse was called Friday

My mum was 32 when she had me. I was 31 when I became a parent. I'm not her oldest child though so it's not quite comparable. Am I getting the question wrong?

Do you mean if you had become a parent at the same age your mother WAS when she had you? She must have actually had you so not sure why you are using the conditional tense for a concrete event in the past that has already definitely happened. My mind has gone to a parallel universe where my mother might not have had me. Very confusing op.

Haha this. What a convoluted way to ask the question.

Ah you beat me for biggest difference 😂
she was 40 I was 16

Our gap is 15 years bigger than that.

If I’d had my DS at the same age my DM had me then my now 4 year old would be 31!

No idea as my mum refused to acknowledge her birthdays or admit her age after 30….apparently getting older was for other folk!!

My mum was 42, had her first at 28. I was 34, with my only. Both my sisters had theirs between 30-35 too.

What a bizarre question.

I'm not my mum's first child either so it doesn't give you much useful information.

My mum was 32 when she had me. I was 25 when I had my first child and so was she.

exactly 3 weeks younger ;-)

Difference was, I was my mother's fourth child. She'd been a parent almost 7 years at that point.

If I’d had my daughter at the same age my mum had me, I’d have a 30 year old instead of a 14 year old!