Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

The top 10% of taxpayers contribute 60% of income tax...

796 replies

MsPinkMarshmallow · 03/11/2025 11:43

I'm fed up of hearing that "high earners" will be targeted by the next budget.

The top 10% of taxpayers pay 60% of income tax.

Don't piss them off. They'll just leave the UK or work less so they're taxed less.

Some more stats: in 2024-25, the top 1% of income tax payers earned 13.3 per cent of total income and paid 28.2 per cent of income tax

35% of adults in the UK pay no tax at all

More from the Taxpayers Alliance here:

https://www.taxpayersalliance.com/briefing_share_of_income_tax_paid_by_percentile

<stands back and awaits kicking>

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
MidnightMeltdown · 04/11/2025 13:01

Digdongdoo · 04/11/2025 12:38

It's unhelpful hyperbole to call a salaried income of any amount "grotesque". It is earned money.
And it did used to be like this. You don't have to go back far at all and inequality was far worse. There was a brief blip in modern history where life was more affordable for the masses, but the demographic challenges and the current demands on the welfare state didn't exist. The minumum wage didnt exist, fewer people paid tax at all. Its a useless comparison.
Skills and expertise should be valuable. Your grievance should be with those who don't earn their wealth.

I didn’t call a salaried income grotesque, I called the wage discrepancy grotesque. You are right, things improved after the war when inequality was reducing, and now we are going backwards again as a society.

I am not talking about people who don’t earn their wealth. I am talking about people who work full time in low paid employment.

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:01

EasternStandard · 04/11/2025 12:45

Do you mean everyone on the same wage no matter what they’re doing?

No, qualifications and training should of course be rewarded, but experience and work ethic should also be rewarded. The gap between salary levels should be more conservative, no more 250k bosses and every other staff member on NMW.

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:02

Boohoo76 · 04/11/2025 12:46

Even more thankfully, we are not all you! Some of us have enough intelligence to understand that a doctor is a more stressful role than a barista. Would you like me to give you examples of why my current role is far more stressful than working on the checkout at Tesco?

It's not just about stress levels, it's about how society functions as a whole. The upper levels need the lower levels.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:03

Boohoo76 · 04/11/2025 12:47

Even more thankfully, we are not all you! Some of us have enough intelligence to understand that a doctor is a more stressful role than a barista. Would you like me to give you examples of why my current role is far more stressful than working on the checkout at Tesco?

Not intelligent enough to not post multiple times though, eh? Internet issues?

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:05

Digdongdoo · 04/11/2025 12:53

Salaries would rise naturally, across the board.

How? How would lower level salaries rise just because some folk up skilled?

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:06

Digdongdoo · 04/11/2025 12:56

No it isn't. Maximizing how much you can take, is not the same as reducing the amount you give. Very different things.

It's still working the system for your own gain.

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:07

MariaMyBeck · 04/11/2025 13:00

As much? Check out staff are gonna get replaced with more and more self checkouts. It's a low skilled job and gets paid accordingly.

Is stacking shelves as worthwhile as helping someone with the intracacies of the law?

Well, if nobody stacks the shelves the lawyer cannot buy her groceries, and then she cannot tell everyone how important she is by charging silly amounts to sign a letter.......

Digdongdoo · 04/11/2025 13:11

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:06

It's still working the system for your own gain.

"The system" doesn't exist without those who fund it.

Digdongdoo · 04/11/2025 13:12

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:05

How? How would lower level salaries rise just because some folk up skilled?

Supply and demand. More disposable money. More taxes being paid.

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:13

Digdongdoo · 04/11/2025 13:11

"The system" doesn't exist without those who fund it.

Yes, that's how the welfare state works. Folk manipulate it in different ways. This isn't new information.

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:15

Digdongdoo · 04/11/2025 13:12

Supply and demand. More disposable money. More taxes being paid.

More taxes aren't necessarily being paid though, unless brand new up skilled roles are being created, and it's not certain that will be the case. Folk may just be filling vacancies and not stepping into newly created roles.

Digdongdoo · 04/11/2025 13:17

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:13

Yes, that's how the welfare state works. Folk manipulate it in different ways. This isn't new information.

Yes but you understand that paying for is not the same thing as taking from?
Are you sure you've got a PHD?

MidnightMeltdown · 04/11/2025 13:19

MariaMyBeck · 04/11/2025 12:40

It's up to the employer and employee as to how much they want to pay more. Employer and employee agree on it, what's your problem?

You can upskill, there's so much available. Online courses (some free, some with a small charge). All you need is a laptop and the internet. You can learn to use excel, powerbi, use python and all that. You can teach yourself a lot.

You might be a higher rate tax payer. We're an additionally rate tax payer.

The problem, is that a society cannot function with some people earning massive salaries, while others work all hours and are unable to afford to live.

Everyone learning excel and python is not the answer. We already have plenty of people with those skills, and not enough decently paid jobs. There are already thousands of unemployed computer science graduates who can’t get jobs, and you think that the ticket to highly paid career is an online certificate in excel? You are so out of touch.

Digdongdoo · 04/11/2025 13:19

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:15

More taxes aren't necessarily being paid though, unless brand new up skilled roles are being created, and it's not certain that will be the case. Folk may just be filling vacancies and not stepping into newly created roles.

Well yeah, filling vacancies in higher paid roles. because thankfully we don't actually live in your socialist la la land.

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:23

Digdongdoo · 04/11/2025 13:19

Well yeah, filling vacancies in higher paid roles. because thankfully we don't actually live in your socialist la la land.

Yes, and more people will be filling the lower paid roles too - the roles so low paid that they need support just to survive. And so the cycle continues......

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:25

Digdongdoo · 04/11/2025 13:17

Yes but you understand that paying for is not the same thing as taking from?
Are you sure you've got a PHD?

Are you sure you don't understand what manipulating the system means? It's all driven by selfish but understandable desires. And yes, I'm sure I've got a PhD, which I only actually mentioned when folk started boasting about how clever they are with their Masters.

Vinvertebrate · 04/11/2025 13:27

Boohoo76 · 04/11/2025 12:02

How much extra does a teacher get paid in London? How much more do you they have to pay to get on the property ladder (including stamp duty, not just the property itself)? Do you genuinely think that the London uplift covers the extra costs and they have loads of money left over because their council tax is a bit less than yours? And I just randomly picked teaching, you could replace it with many, many different jobs.

I was stating a fact, not opening a debate about teaching salaries. London council tax is lower than most of the rest of the country. So either council tax in London is too low and should increase, or the rest of the country's rates should be reduced. I could be persuaded either way on that one, since I don't own a property there.

If you can't afford to live in London, then don't - it's not compulsory.

Kuretake · 04/11/2025 13:29

You might be a higher rate tax payer. We're an additionally rate tax payer

Tax rate is calculated on an individual's salary so "we" are an additionally (sic) rate tax payer is nonsense. Unless you're the queen I suppose.

Araminta1003 · 04/11/2025 13:30

London council tax is lower because the councils generate other income! Why should we subsidise the rest of the country. We already subsidise the rest of the country via income tax anyway. Create your own jobs.

Araminta1003 · 04/11/2025 13:31

Parking charges, business rates etc etc - hefty fines for entering a bus lane. Create your own fines!

EasternStandard · 04/11/2025 13:33

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 13:07

Well, if nobody stacks the shelves the lawyer cannot buy her groceries, and then she cannot tell everyone how important she is by charging silly amounts to sign a letter.......

How much roughly do you think the shelf stacker and lawyer should be paid?

Kuretake · 04/11/2025 13:35

EasternStandard · 04/11/2025 13:33

How much roughly do you think the shelf stacker and lawyer should be paid?

I think both should be paid enough that I'm not having to subsidise Tesco's shareholders via the tax credit system.

I'm a lawyer btw so I guess I support me always being well paid thanks for looking out for us.

Araminta1003 · 04/11/2025 13:37

And for Councils in London, licence fees for landlords, like the one Rachel Reeves failed to pay quite recently? All of these costs get passed on to local businesses and local people. So whether people pay via council tax or that way, they are still paying! Why should Londoners keep working harder and paying more whilst the rest of the country just sits back and expects to be subsidised?

MariaMyBeck · 04/11/2025 13:39

GehenSieweiter · 04/11/2025 12:53

Eh?
How do you propose someone works multiple full time jobs? Your points are getting more absurd.

People do work multiple jobs.

I was inspired by a man I saw on YouTube who grew up dirt poor in the states but "hustled his way to success".

He did struggle a lot growing up, but he did work multiple different jobs to make ends meet.

EasternStandard · 04/11/2025 13:44

Kuretake · 04/11/2025 13:35

I think both should be paid enough that I'm not having to subsidise Tesco's shareholders via the tax credit system.

I'm a lawyer btw so I guess I support me always being well paid thanks for looking out for us.

Edited

Ha that’s ok, enjoy. I’m still interested in figures if the pp or anyone wants to be upfront.

Swipe left for the next trending thread