50 miles per week is nothing and given not only did OP NOT CLAIM this mileage in the first place the companies own system did and she was ill and looking after a sick mother and doing probably 15 hour days if we take in to account the amount of driving she did. She missed it. It was not intentional.
What was her managers excuse for claiming this for her
If we break this 50 miles per week up into days that is 10 miles per day, 5 miles there and 5 miles back
Are we absolutely certain that the systems calculations of all the journeys anyone took were exactly the mileage that the system said it was.
I would argue that if she looked at how long the journeys that the system claimed on her behalf were for from the whole time she was at the company. I can almost guarantee that they owe her money and probably owe the others who do this type of job.
Whilst you can get an idea of the distance between two points it doesn’t take account of of councils not letting Google know they have made certain roads residents only or you can’t drive northward on a certain road between 9am -5pm or there are roadworks, traffic accidents and diversions in place etc So all adding to the mileage travelled.
When on a long journey does the system take account of the mileage that getting off the motorway to go have a coffee and a break even in a motorway service station can add an extra .25mile which adds up over time.
I would say that their system is flawed and fighting it could open up a whole can of worms in their expenses over all their staff doing these journeys past and present
Please HoldingOnatoday ring Acas and explain what has happened
Look at your home insurance policy under legal cover. It’s not usually something you choose to add on. It’s just part of your standard insurance policy
Get in touch with your home insurers and ask about the procedure to claim through their legal cover or what ever it is called.
When Exh had his issues the home insurance company gave him a list of employment law solicitors they dealt with in our area. All bills were then sent to the home insurance company.
There are so many holes in this dismissal
I would also say that the fact your boss missed this when he should have checked and it appears nothing has happened to him is a huge issue and could open up discrimination issues
The reason for adding in discrimination is because whilst being proved correct in a court of law regarding employment law the payout has an upper limit to how much you can be paid. Where as if there is proven discrimination then there is no upper limit.
That is when companies legal team have to explain to those in charge and who did this to you that you could bankrupt the company if you win and they will explain to them the weaknesses in their case
In exh’s case and from what we found out companies especially large ones with a national or international name or brand or those on the stock exchange or those that just know that their actions haven’t portrayed them in a great light if any of this gets out will damage the brand, the name or even stock market prices plus the calibre of future employees. Anyone who is any good won’t want to go work for a company that treats its employees with such disdain so will settle out of court.
I do not think for one moment that they have called the police. That is a threat to keep you scared and wont sue them
Also I can’t imagine the police taking time to actually do anything for something that involves just £900. It would make them a laughing stock that they would pursue a “crime” that involved £900 but won’t pursue the guy who robs around £10,000 per week in my area.
£900 isn’t even on their radar.
Now if you had been speeding and had racked up £900 worth of fines then they might pursue you.