Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Southport killer Axel Rudakubana will not be named in the public enquiry

69 replies

NoelFaraday · 08/07/2025 15:39

Southport killer Axel Rudakubana will not be named in the upcoming public probe into last summer's triple murders, the inquiry's chairman has revealed.

Rudakubana, 18, will instead be referred to in the report as the "perpetrator" or "AR".
In his opening statement on Tuesday, inquiry chairman Sir Adrian Fulford claimed that Rudakubana’s name should not be used for reasons of sensitivity.
Fulford said: “For the benefit of the victims and their families, for whom this is an issue of significant and wholly understandable sensitivity, his name should not be used again during this inquiry.

“He will will simply be referred to as ‘the perpetrator’ or ‘AR’.”
The ex-Court of Appeal judge added: “However hard we try, ordinary language simply fails to reflect the enormity of what he did on July 29 last year.
"None of the most powerful adjectives even begin to suffice: there are no words that adequately describe what occurred and I am not going to try (and then fail) to find them.”
The Liverpool Town Hall inquiry will focus on whether the attack could have been prevented and whether adequate measures are in place to tackle teenagers “who are drawn into extreme violence without a commitment to a particular religious or political cause”.

The probe has been launched just months after Rudakubana was handed a life sentence with a minimum term of 52 years in January.
Rudakubana carried out his horrific attack at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport on July 29 last year.

Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, were tragically killed in the stabbing spree.
Rudakubana also attempted to murder eight other children, class instructor Leanne Lucas and local businessman John Hayes.

…………

Remember when they tried to pass him off as being a Welsh choirboy and only posted photos of him as a little boy?

He is an evil murderer and his name should be read out in full.

OP posts:
BuffetTheDietSlayer · 08/07/2025 15:42

The families will probably find it much easier without having to read/hear his name repeatedly.

CurbsideProphet · 08/07/2025 15:43

The clue is there: "for the benefit of the families and victims". So what you think doesn't really matter.

MrsFinkelstein · 08/07/2025 15:43

We know his name, the focus should be on the victims. Don't give him the notoriety - that's what he wants.

TheignT · 08/07/2025 15:43

I don't remember anything about him being a choirboy but I guess some killers were choirboys once. When I think back to school some of the naughtiest boys were altar servers.

I'd go with what the parents want. Some people feel we should remember the names of the victims not the perpetrators.

Lins77 · 08/07/2025 15:43

But they are saying it is because of sensitivity to the families impacted by this horrible crime. His name is obviously publicly known. What's the benefit of reading it out in full, if that's not what the families want to happen?

Barrenfieldoffucks · 08/07/2025 15:44

To be frank OP, this isn't about you.

TheAutumnCrow · 08/07/2025 15:45

OP, I’m not sure you’ve understood what you’ve read.

Flashout · 08/07/2025 15:47

OP you’ve missed the point.

MemorableTrenchcoat · 08/07/2025 15:49

He is, indeed, an evil murderer. However, the victims’ families don’t want his name read out in full, so we should respect their wishes, no?

Dontcallmescarface · 08/07/2025 15:56

And what YOU want trumps what the families of the girls he killed and those he injured want, because...? Hate to break it to you Op but your feelings and wants, count for diddly squat when it comes to this enquiry. So think of the victims, the survivors and their families and grow the fuck up.

marcopront · 08/07/2025 16:09

@NoelFaraday
I don’t understand why reading out his name in full makes a difference.

Please can you explain how the victims are helped by that.

Lins77 · 08/07/2025 16:12

This may be unfair, in which case I apologise in advance, but - given the Welsh choirboy comment - would you feel so strongly about having his name read out if it was Bob Smith?

mommatoone · 08/07/2025 16:13

Not sure where you are going with this OP? Its seems it's in the best interests of the victims families. Can't see a problem with that.

sciaticafanatica · 08/07/2025 16:14

You are not the main character here
its about the victims and their family.

BeardofHagrid · 08/07/2025 16:18

It just about sums Britain up. Always hiding the facts and drawing a veil of secrecy around (for some people) “uncomfortable” truths. We aren’t even allowed to mention the nationality of certain tennis players 🙄

Darragon · 08/07/2025 16:19

Well some people in authority have decided it's "best for the victims' families" so it must be (wide-eyed blinking).

If they'd actually asked the victims families I'd feel differently but this comes across like they haven't.

Not naming him went so very well for them last time they didn't name him when they should have.

VintageKefir · 08/07/2025 16:20

I actually think that none of similar criminals should be always named in full. Takr away the infamousness, make it easier on victims. If that makes sense.
Everyone knows who they are, doesn't mean thrir name needs to be mentioned all the time. It's not hiding anything.

Lins77 · 08/07/2025 16:21

Darragon · 08/07/2025 16:19

Well some people in authority have decided it's "best for the victims' families" so it must be (wide-eyed blinking).

If they'd actually asked the victims families I'd feel differently but this comes across like they haven't.

Not naming him went so very well for them last time they didn't name him when they should have.

Edited

We know his name. It's right there in the article quoted by the OP. Nobody is hiding what his name is.

BalladOfBarryAndFreda · 08/07/2025 16:25

Darragon · 08/07/2025 16:19

Well some people in authority have decided it's "best for the victims' families" so it must be (wide-eyed blinking).

If they'd actually asked the victims families I'd feel differently but this comes across like they haven't.

Not naming him went so very well for them last time they didn't name him when they should have.

Edited

https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/dpps-response-questions-around-release-information-relating-trial-axel-rudakubana

The information was not released earlier because it would've risked the families getting justice, not because of some big anti-white, Islamic conspiracy.

DPP's response to questions around the release of information relating to the trial of Axel Rudakubana | The Crown Prosecution Service

https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/dpps-response-questions-around-release-information-relating-trial-axel-rudakubana

Pyjamatimenow · 08/07/2025 16:27

Naming him could give him some sort of perverse kick. I think they’re being sensitive to the families. I always think it’s sick when you get movies and dramatisations about serial killers. It gives them too much airtime.
Three beautiful little girls have been murdered and more completely traumatised. They need to investigate if there’s anything that could have been done to stop it. Naming him doesn’t help that process. From what I know his parents were educated, professional people, other professionals flagged up his behaviour and yet he committed this terrible crime. Something has gone terribly wrong somewhere. Not saying he’s not responsible but there must have been missed opportunities to stop him.

MammaTo · 08/07/2025 16:27

So what trumps your need for his name to be published (which it already is btw) to help alleviate some of the pain the families might feel hearing his name over and over again. The Welsh choir boy comment makes me think very little of you sorry.

TooBigForMyBoots · 08/07/2025 16:38

No it shouldn't if it will cause distress to the families of the dead girls @NoelFaraday.Hmm

sellotapechicken · 08/07/2025 16:47

It’s the no notoriety aspect. Americans have it too, don’t give them any attention or ‘credit’ https://nonotoriety.com/

Southport killer Axel Rudakubana will not be named in the public enquiry
PandoraSocks · 08/07/2025 16:52

It is similar to the approach taken by New Zealand to the perpetrator of the terrorist attack in Christchurch.

PandoraSocks · 08/07/2025 16:55

Darragon · 08/07/2025 16:19

Well some people in authority have decided it's "best for the victims' families" so it must be (wide-eyed blinking).

If they'd actually asked the victims families I'd feel differently but this comes across like they haven't.

Not naming him went so very well for them last time they didn't name him when they should have.

Edited

So come on, what benefit is it to those "in authority" not to name him?

It is not like everyone has forgotten him, and will wonder who AR is, is it?

Swipe left for the next trending thread