Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Heathrow Airport is shut until Friday night

489 replies

Ozgirl76 · 21/03/2025 03:24

And my husband is due to fly home to Australia on Friday evening. I predict chaos.
Airport is saying that people should not travel to Heathrow and should contact their airlines.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
CaveMum · 21/03/2025 08:54

I agree that much of our infrastructure is aging and has been underinvested in.

I still think it’s highly unlikely that such a key piece servicing a major transport hub would not have contingencies. I mean it’s a bit strange that the back ups are not working too?

Very happy to be proven wrong, but the sceptic in me thinks this has deliberate sabotage written all over it.

CaveMum · 21/03/2025 08:56

AllTheTreesOfTheField · 21/03/2025 08:53

Ed Miliband is doing the rounds saying there is 'no suggestion that there is foul play', so that's alright then.

At this stage they have to say that. Diplomacy and all that jazz.

notimagain · 21/03/2025 08:56

JustMyView13 · 21/03/2025 08:49

Evidently not from a rebooking perspective, given that passengers aren’t being given that option. You know flight cancellations happen daily right? Granted not on this volume, but they’re still selling flights for early next week. Flights that with the right tech behind it, could be offered to stranded passengers.
I think you underestimate the power of the technology that’s out there these days, and how archaic BA’s IT systems are (which is a known fact).

TBF given many aircraft and crews are going to be out of position until we don’t know when It could take several days to get flying programmes back to normality, especially when it comes to Long Haul

I can see why at least some airlines especially the LHR based ones haven’t swung into action with rebookings this early in proceedings.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

notimagain · 21/03/2025 08:58

CaveMum · 21/03/2025 08:54

I agree that much of our infrastructure is aging and has been underinvested in.

I still think it’s highly unlikely that such a key piece servicing a major transport hub would not have contingencies. I mean it’s a bit strange that the back ups are not working too?

Very happy to be proven wrong, but the sceptic in me thinks this has deliberate sabotage written all over it.

I suspect/know the Air Traffic side of the operation will have had power back ups of some sort.

Backing up the whole airport so jetties can move, baggage can be shifted, lights be on etc etc etc….don’t know.

B1indEye · 21/03/2025 08:59

JustMyView13 · 21/03/2025 08:31

Flights get cancelled every day. It’s literally parr for the course of running an airline.

There’s flights available on Tues/Weds that people could switch onto but the absence of any central coordination means those flights will be gone by the time they communicate.

We're not talking about a few flight cancellations though are we, an unexpected closure of an airport is a complety different matter

But I'm sure the airlines would appreciate any advice on how to set up such a system

SnoozingFox · 21/03/2025 08:59

@notimagain they do. A lot of people working in ATC have not been to bed yet. (other than the controllers who would have been on shift anyway).

ScrewedByFunding · 21/03/2025 09:00

JustMyView13 · 21/03/2025 06:35

It amazes me how airlines like BA don’t have emergency protocol in this situation. I’ve got a relative due to fly out around 11am today & all they have is an email saying there’s an issue and they’ll know more soon,
If the airport is closed all day, surely it makes sense to cancel the flight and trigger a rebooking link. Instead you just end up in limbo land, I know their IT is rubbish but we have the technology available for this stuff to be automated.

They do, but it still takes time.

My parents were due to fly out this morning, they've already been rebooked for tomorrow.

KenAdams · 21/03/2025 09:00

MarchHare339 · 21/03/2025 07:16

December . I don’t take long haul flights though. I flew four times last year to different destinations.

Edited

Wifi has been on planes for years, including shorthaul so I'm not quite sure how it's escaped your attention. You don't seem to understand how wifi and flight mode work together either.

If you've got no idea because you dont even fly long haul, maybe don't come on here trying to tell off a poster who is in a shit situation in the first place?

roses2 · 21/03/2025 09:00

Magicmushroomsauce · 21/03/2025 04:58

Call me a conspiracy theorist if you like, but I reckon it’s likely to be Russia? On the same day there’s a big meeting with lots of military chiefs in London there’s a fire that closes our countries major airport? Or it’s a major coincidence!

The military talks were yesterday not today so they would have arrived before the airport closed.

Nottodaythankyou123 · 21/03/2025 09:01

notimagain · 21/03/2025 08:49

I was being slightly TIC..

Yep, it apparently is down to a big fire in a substation in Hayes, next to where the old Nestle’s factory used to be.

the page hadn’t uploaded so I didn’t see you’d been beset with people saying the same thing, sorry!

Bjorkdidit · 21/03/2025 09:02

CaveMum · 21/03/2025 08:54

I agree that much of our infrastructure is aging and has been underinvested in.

I still think it’s highly unlikely that such a key piece servicing a major transport hub would not have contingencies. I mean it’s a bit strange that the back ups are not working too?

Very happy to be proven wrong, but the sceptic in me thinks this has deliberate sabotage written all over it.

Contingencies, yes.

Contingencies for the entire airport power supply, possibly not.

Sometimes it's only possible to do so much for reasonable cost. Especially, as you acknowledge, that much of our ageing infrastructure has been underinvested in and likely been massively outgrown by the increase in traffic over the last couple of decades.

Plus the priority in the same time will have been security upgrades. If they'd have said 'security will have to wait until we've brought the electrical supply and it's built in resilience up to the best modern standards' there'd have possibly been more successful terrorist attacks or disruption due to late stage near misses.

AllTheTreesOfTheField · 21/03/2025 09:02

@CaveMum Diplomacy plus 'damage control' averting public fear and panic.

Julieju1 · 21/03/2025 09:03

I really feel for anyone affected by this.

It's time air travel in the UK stopped focusing on big airports. When something goes wrong it's chaos.
Instead of increasing capacity at big airports like Heathrow, capacity should increase a smaller airports. Cardiff has loads of spare capacity, I'm sure others must be the same.

Glowingworms · 21/03/2025 09:03

@JustMyView13

Rebooting flights like this is a nightmare

Say you have a plane of 200 passengers. (Lots of planes will be far far larger than this) going from Glasgow to London.

If you scheduled it for next week, then very few of those people would want the rebooking. As evidenced on this thread, half the people would decide not to go (cant be bothered, holiday would be over by the time they got there) lots would just get train and plenty would have already booked via an alternate provider.

The reality is that there is about 1500 flights impacted currently, some of those planes will fit about 500 passengers in each. Your looking at an easy half a million passengers.

Slowly those people will be contacted and plans made. Rebooking a flight for tomorrow and you'd get a big chunk of passengers, next Tuesday less so

Along with the drama of them not knowing where their and staff planes will be.

Its the same reason you can book train tickets while there's problems on the rails, people simply have a raft of things to get through and no idea how to do it

xanthomelana · 21/03/2025 09:06

notimagain · 21/03/2025 08:58

I suspect/know the Air Traffic side of the operation will have had power back ups of some sort.

Backing up the whole airport so jetties can move, baggage can be shifted, lights be on etc etc etc….don’t know.

I thought the same but Dh informs me that the amount of generators needed for this would be huge and just not possible. We’ve got backup generators in my workplace but even they will only keep the absolute essential things powered, everything non essential stays off.

sashh · 21/03/2025 09:08

JustMyView13 · 21/03/2025 08:49

Evidently not from a rebooking perspective, given that passengers aren’t being given that option. You know flight cancellations happen daily right? Granted not on this volume, but they’re still selling flights for early next week. Flights that with the right tech behind it, could be offered to stranded passengers.
I think you underestimate the power of the technology that’s out there these days, and how archaic BA’s IT systems are (which is a known fact).

Are BA using Ada? I know air traffic control and Boeing systems use it.

I think the flights they are selling for next week are book on the assumption of the planes being where they should be.

JustMyView13 · 21/03/2025 09:10

ScrewedByFunding · 21/03/2025 09:00

They do, but it still takes time.

My parents were due to fly out this morning, they've already been rebooked for tomorrow.

Precisely my point! It’s not that hard to get people rebooked.

notimagain · 21/03/2025 09:10

Julieju1 · 21/03/2025 09:03

I really feel for anyone affected by this.

It's time air travel in the UK stopped focusing on big airports. When something goes wrong it's chaos.
Instead of increasing capacity at big airports like Heathrow, capacity should increase a smaller airports. Cardiff has loads of spare capacity, I'm sure others must be the same.

@xanthomelana

Thanks,

For info and context similar has happened elsewhere:

https://apnews.com/article/new-york-city-power-outages-eb88322b4643bc179641694b715fbb56

jasflowers · 21/03/2025 09:11

AllTheTreesOfTheField · 21/03/2025 08:45

A fire at an electrical substation is not Heathrow's fuck up!

Not quite, its Heathrows responsibility to ensure reliance.

They've failed, the whole airport power run from one substation.... the same substation that runs half of Hayes too....

notimagain · 21/03/2025 09:12

Julieju1 · 21/03/2025 09:03

I really feel for anyone affected by this.

It's time air travel in the UK stopped focusing on big airports. When something goes wrong it's chaos.
Instead of increasing capacity at big airports like Heathrow, capacity should increase a smaller airports. Cardiff has loads of spare capacity, I'm sure others must be the same.

Question is though is do the good people of Cardiff want the flights and all that goes with it, and would there be enough passengers wanting to fly from say JFK or Dubai to Cardiff to make such routes viable.

Glowingworms · 21/03/2025 09:12

xanthomelana · 21/03/2025 09:06

I thought the same but Dh informs me that the amount of generators needed for this would be huge and just not possible. We’ve got backup generators in my workplace but even they will only keep the absolute essential things powered, everything non essential stays off.

I imagine when it happened, back up generators kicked in so people weren't stuck in lifts, the airfield wasn't plunged into darkness etc.

Its a bit like having a fire door, it allows you to get out safely, and do all the essential bits but shouldn't be relied on just to keep you working as normal as it only lasts for a period and will eventually fail.

Otherwise if there was then a generator problem, you'd have planes mid air having all the ground lights turned off on them, people stuck behind electric doors etc.

Like emergency lights at work, theres rarely enough power in big buildings to power as usual, but enough to do the minimum safety things.

AllTheTreesOfTheField · 21/03/2025 09:12

Thinking about it, Easter break is not far away, and surely much more chaos would ensue with large scale deliberate disruption to a major airport, with far more children in the mix, but would that be too obvious?

Slimbear · 21/03/2025 09:18

We flew from Glasgow to Brisbane with Emirates changing in Dubai if there is a chance to change

Fountybeach · 21/03/2025 09:19

roses2 · 21/03/2025 09:00

The military talks were yesterday not today so they would have arrived before the airport closed.

They will be aware of what has happened though while they are here. I assumed that the previous poster meant the timing could be significant in terms of sending a message, rather then trying to prevent anyone from attending.

juggleit · 21/03/2025 09:19

Candyflosslatte · 21/03/2025 07:20

I firmly believe they won’t be a warning of something worse just that they’ll become more frequent. Total disruption can be achieved with a high frequency of simultaneous ‘attacks’ like this. The Russians would not need to attack us conventionally with weapons. They’d sit back and watch us fight each other over things people need and wouldn’t be able to get. They know how we acted over toilet paper and pasta during covid it really wouldn’t be hard .

Edited

The Russians know we are weak - we wont retaliate in any way.

They have tested us many times to see our reaction. Salisbury poisonings spring to mind.

The system was tested during covid - and it broke - easy pickings for a hostile actor.

Swipe left for the next trending thread