Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

7.4 million people claim some form of disability or incapacity benefits

1000 replies

MidnightPatrol · 17/03/2025 08:15

Given the various back and forth of discussion on the reduction in disability and incapacity benefits, not much data on the debate has been shared - it’s a mainly emotional debate.

So for context, the figures:

  • 7.4 million people claim sickness benefits of some kind
  • The total number of claimants has increased by a third in five years (up 1.8 million)
  • 1 in 10 working age adults claims, and 1 in 12 school aged children
  • 1.2 million people aged under 25 claim sickness benefits, a rise of two thirds in 5 years - 1 in 15 claiming something
  • 4 million adults claim sickness benefit of some kind, up from 2.8 million in 2019. Two thirds of that increase is people under 50.
  • 2.5 million people claim UC health benefits, up 500k people this year alone - in 2019 less than 500k people claimed this
  • 1.8 million have no requirement to look for work
  • Sickness benefits for working age adults are expected to cost £70b by 2030 - a third of the cost of the NHS
OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
beetr00 · 17/03/2025 16:40

Itsalljustinmyhead · 17/03/2025 16:30

Op I think you’ve been brave in starting this thread and calling you ‘cowardly’ ‘stupid’ and ‘a billionaire’s gimp’ is the typical emotional abuse I would expect from people who seem unable, or unwilling, to address the figures. Ironically they would say they’re ’standing up for the vulnerable’ but can display some of the most obtuse and bullying behaviour on here. That doesn’t surprise me.

You and 100% correct in everything you’ve said. Whataboutery around billionaires, emotional blackmail and accusing anyone who disagrees as being a Nazi will not work for much longer. This issue is wearing thin now and finally the tide is turning.

Regardless of the opinions of anyone on this thread, the current level of benefit spending cannot and will not continue. Because it physically can’t.

As I said before: most people are good people. They are happy to contribute to those in need. But not so those people can have more money than they do. And that is not selfish. It feels like every area of spending is dominated by people with ‘needs’ and very little functions for people without them any more. Here’s hoping the changes are rigorous.

"would expect from people who seem unable, or unwilling, to address the figures"

not emotional abuse and certainly not "the most obtuse and bullying behaviour"

Just questioning how to raise our capital, without screwing over the citizens of our country?

Itsalljustinmyhead · 17/03/2025 16:41

CentralLimit · 17/03/2025 16:34

I get why parents of disabled kids are on here, explaining their experience and attempting to educate people about the reality of it. But, I worry that this is feeding into a narrative that they are the problem, the thing that needs to be addressed.

Over on another platform I'm hearing talk of the rise of the "fuck you" left - the idea that we should step off the treadmill of continually trying to educate the idiots and simply tell them to STFU.

I find it quite attractive, although with the amount of misinformation about, I think that everyone deserves one pass.

In that spirit, I'm sharing an infographic on the relative importance of tax avoidance/evasion Vs benefit fraud, and an article on the rich and climate change. If anyone sees these and still wants to focus on disabled children then the gloves are off.

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/inequalities/2024/11/19/billionaire-pollutocrats-are-driving-the-climate-crisis/

…you do realise that infographic is from 2013?

K0OLA1D · 17/03/2025 16:43

icelolly12 · 17/03/2025 08:24

Sickness benefits for working age adults are expected to cost £70b by 2030

Well it's clearly not sustainable to have such a significant proportion not contributing to the economy/society and costing taxpayers so much. If numbers are increasing we need to look at why and what can be done about it. Whether that's better services and support or stricter conditions for claiming.

I contribute as someone on higher rate PIP

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Itsalljustinmyhead · 17/03/2025 16:43

beetr00 · 17/03/2025 16:40

"would expect from people who seem unable, or unwilling, to address the figures"

not emotional abuse and certainly not "the most obtuse and bullying behaviour"

Just questioning how to raise our capital, without screwing over the citizens of our country?

By people working.

Stunning concept, I know.

Kirbert2 · 17/03/2025 16:43

CentralLimit · 17/03/2025 16:34

I get why parents of disabled kids are on here, explaining their experience and attempting to educate people about the reality of it. But, I worry that this is feeding into a narrative that they are the problem, the thing that needs to be addressed.

Over on another platform I'm hearing talk of the rise of the "fuck you" left - the idea that we should step off the treadmill of continually trying to educate the idiots and simply tell them to STFU.

I find it quite attractive, although with the amount of misinformation about, I think that everyone deserves one pass.

In that spirit, I'm sharing an infographic on the relative importance of tax avoidance/evasion Vs benefit fraud, and an article on the rich and climate change. If anyone sees these and still wants to focus on disabled children then the gloves are off.

https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/inequalities/2024/11/19/billionaire-pollutocrats-are-driving-the-climate-crisis/

I know I'm probably wasting my breath but I had to try. Especially since right now DLA seems to make people automatically think ADHD/ASD when yes, many parents claim for that but many parents also claim DLA for so many different reasons too.

Anyone can suddenly find themselves with a disabled child, no one thinks it will ever happen to them until it does and all of a sudden they have to quit their jobs, claim UC and rely on a system others seem to resent.

I'd gladly swap the money to have my healthy child back. I'm sure the vast majority of parents would rather their healthy child than the money too.

beetr00 · 17/03/2025 16:44

Itsalljustinmyhead · 17/03/2025 16:43

By people working.

Stunning concept, I know.

and contributing fairly to our tax system?

Itsalljustinmyhead · 17/03/2025 16:46

beetr00 · 17/03/2025 16:44

and contributing fairly to our tax system?

Who isn’t contributing fairly? We have the highest tax burden since WW2. The top 1% of earnings pay 30% of income tax. The only people not contributing fairly are those not contributing at all for spurious reasons.

Delatron · 17/03/2025 16:47

To be fair I didn’t realise you could claim for ADHD. And I have a DS with diagnosed ADHD. So that does need to be looked at. I’m not sure the thinking with payments for that? People with ADHD are perfectly capable of working.

As an aside his ADHD has cost us a fortune in terms of a diagnosis, medication, school change. But we are lucky and we can afford it.

LoztWorld · 17/03/2025 16:47

wherearemypastnames · 17/03/2025 16:23

So in short we must not question the huge rise on numbers of people claiming anything - and no even if everyone with long Covid was claiming that doesn’t account for the rise - because they are clearly all genuine and must never be questioned or they will kill themselves. And anyone who does it evil and values money over people.

I don’t think most people are saying this. I doubt there are many people on this thread who would deny the growing number of people on sickness benefits indicates a serious problem in our society.

What most of us are arguing is that simply cutting benefits won’t solve that problem and may well exacerbate it. At the very least, it will harm many vulnerable people who have done nothing wrong.

Actually addressing the problem would be complex and would, I’m afraid, cost more money initially. But we invest in order to save in the long term.

I am confident that simple cuts will not address people’s health issues, not result in savings, and will actually result in increased spending on appeals. Oh, and they’ll be ruinous for many genuinely disabled people too, into the bargain.

That’s what I object to. Obviously I don’t think it’s all fine and dandy that we have so many people on sickness benefits, either socially or economically.

But the idea that this can be addressed with a massive pair of scissors is just reactionary nonsense driven by the worst of human impulses.

HÆLTHEPAIN · 17/03/2025 16:49

wherearemypastnames · 17/03/2025 16:23

So in short we must not question the huge rise on numbers of people claiming anything - and no even if everyone with long Covid was claiming that doesn’t account for the rise - because they are clearly all genuine and must never be questioned or they will kill themselves. And anyone who does it evil and values money over people.

It’s not a case of if we’re questioned we’ll kill ourselves, like some kind of threat to get you to stop discussing it. That’s a disgusting take on things.

It’s a genuine feeling of ‘what’s the point in us being here’ when people don’t believe we’re actually ill and we’re just milking the system for an easy life. We often feel we’re worthless because we can’t contribute to life anymore. (I appreciate some PIP claimants work).

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 17/03/2025 16:50

Delatron · 17/03/2025 16:47

To be fair I didn’t realise you could claim for ADHD. And I have a DS with diagnosed ADHD. So that does need to be looked at. I’m not sure the thinking with payments for that? People with ADHD are perfectly capable of working.

As an aside his ADHD has cost us a fortune in terms of a diagnosis, medication, school change. But we are lucky and we can afford it.

Not always. My dd was in ND burnout for 2 years. She got PIP.

Kirbert2 · 17/03/2025 16:51

Delatron · 17/03/2025 16:47

To be fair I didn’t realise you could claim for ADHD. And I have a DS with diagnosed ADHD. So that does need to be looked at. I’m not sure the thinking with payments for that? People with ADHD are perfectly capable of working.

As an aside his ADHD has cost us a fortune in terms of a diagnosis, medication, school change. But we are lucky and we can afford it.

You can claim DLA for anything as long as you can prove your child has higher care needs compared to other children their age. Your child doesn't need to have a diagnosis.

IAmNotASheep · 17/03/2025 16:53

LoztWorld · 17/03/2025 16:47

I don’t think most people are saying this. I doubt there are many people on this thread who would deny the growing number of people on sickness benefits indicates a serious problem in our society.

What most of us are arguing is that simply cutting benefits won’t solve that problem and may well exacerbate it. At the very least, it will harm many vulnerable people who have done nothing wrong.

Actually addressing the problem would be complex and would, I’m afraid, cost more money initially. But we invest in order to save in the long term.

I am confident that simple cuts will not address people’s health issues, not result in savings, and will actually result in increased spending on appeals. Oh, and they’ll be ruinous for many genuinely disabled people too, into the bargain.

That’s what I object to. Obviously I don’t think it’s all fine and dandy that we have so many people on sickness benefits, either socially or economically.

But the idea that this can be addressed with a massive pair of scissors is just reactionary nonsense driven by the worst of human impulses.

Perhaps that’s an issue with our Governmental system
Labour will want to make an impact during their tenure and before the next general election
They will want to shout about improvements and savings and ultimately their successes

This system doesn’t look in the long term enough

LoztWorld · 17/03/2025 16:57

IAmNotASheep · 17/03/2025 16:53

Perhaps that’s an issue with our Governmental system
Labour will want to make an impact during their tenure and before the next general election
They will want to shout about improvements and savings and ultimately their successes

This system doesn’t look in the long term enough

I totally agree with you there. The short termism is baked into the system.

beetr00 · 17/03/2025 16:59

Itsalljustinmyhead · 17/03/2025 16:46

Who isn’t contributing fairly? We have the highest tax burden since WW2. The top 1% of earnings pay 30% of income tax. The only people not contributing fairly are those not contributing at all for spurious reasons.

"We have the highest tax burden since WW2" It's definitely not the residents of our country that are abrogating their responsibility.

"Who isn’t contributing fairly?" It's all the pals of our politicians!

Itsalljustinmyhead · 17/03/2025 17:01

beetr00 · 17/03/2025 16:59

"We have the highest tax burden since WW2" It's definitely not the residents of our country that are abrogating their responsibility.

"Who isn’t contributing fairly?" It's all the pals of our politicians!

Which pals? Can you name some?

Delatron · 17/03/2025 17:03

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 17/03/2025 16:50

Not always. My dd was in ND burnout for 2 years. She got PIP.

Ah I’m pleased that help was there for her.

beetr00 · 17/03/2025 17:04

Itsalljustinmyhead · 17/03/2025 17:01

Which pals? Can you name some?

😂

Itsalljustinmyhead · 17/03/2025 17:04

beetr00 · 17/03/2025 17:04

😂

Take that as a no?

UndermyShoeJoe · 17/03/2025 17:06

We can’t support a growing benefits bills regardless of who is claiming the benefits.

The nhs is also not fit for purpose.

For every 100% honest claim there will always be a chancer exaggerating their symptoms too which is why everyone knows someone who gets it and shouldn’t or should get a lower rate which is where people end up demonised.

I know one personally. They should get some help but not as much as they do. It’s an open discussion within the family that if ever offered any help they take it even if not needed so it’s there and looks good for renewal. Think hand rails and special bath seats. Things which are never actually used but now the house is accessible. The persons partner is their career but the person is not more uncapable of being left alone than say a teenager if you thrown some food there way and say don’t answer the door to strangers or burn the house down making chips.

How do we solve the issue. Well again unless every single person pays more tax we cannot. People are living longer, people who would have previously not made it long after birth or infant hood are and requiring a lot of support.

We have moved to a place of life at all costs regardless of quality. I watched the my babies life who decides before. Doctors were saying before parents would say no it’s enough now doctors are having to take parents to court because they just won’t let go. Medical advances have saved lives but ruined actual living of lives. What is a life stuck in bed all day hooked up machines ventilators soiling one’s self. To never talk to never work to never do anything but exist is no life.

Also when does personal responsibility kick it. Let’s look at convenience here. Back in the olden days and today’s hippies (me included) people used reusable nappies, reusable sanity products. So a young child or even adult would of used reusable now it’s throwing loads of disposable nappies/pants/pads in landfill expecting the nhs/benefits to pick up
the cost and it’s bad for the environment. Double edged sword there again when people want to blame environmental factors as well for the increase in medical needs.

Who wants to listen and actually change and fix things other than just more money…. Not enough.

beetr00 · 17/03/2025 17:10

Itsalljustinmyhead · 17/03/2025 17:04

Take that as a no?

have you heard of Mark Twain @Itsalljustinmyhead?

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 17/03/2025 17:12

vivainsomnia · 17/03/2025 15:54

Giving them money while they try to get better, because they can't work until they are starting to recover, is a basic human right
I'd agree if evidence showed that that time helped with getting better. Unfortunately, it does the opposite. Inactivity is shown to lead to more anxiety and depression become chronic and more likely to leave applicants dependent on benefits.

A genuine question. Many have cited COVID, which at the time was indeed very scary, but what is it about it that made so many people unable to recover and move on 5 years on?

Long Covid.

Ive been stuck in bed for 18 months. The fatigue is unreal. Cant even wash my own hair

RelativePitch · 17/03/2025 17:13

Delatron · 17/03/2025 16:47

To be fair I didn’t realise you could claim for ADHD. And I have a DS with diagnosed ADHD. So that does need to be looked at. I’m not sure the thinking with payments for that? People with ADHD are perfectly capable of working.

As an aside his ADHD has cost us a fortune in terms of a diagnosis, medication, school change. But we are lucky and we can afford it.

No I didn't either. My AuDHD DS cost us a bloody fortune when he was little. DLA would have been much needed had I known it was available.
But now he's 13, he really doesn't have any exceptional needs except for 2 private psychiatrist appointments a year costing £800 and that's it. The GP went shared care for meds thank God because for two years we were spending £130 per month on meds!

JohnTheRevelator · 17/03/2025 17:21

And your point is....?

Itsalljustinmyhead · 17/03/2025 17:22

JohnTheRevelator · 17/03/2025 17:21

And your point is....?

If you can’t work it out from the OP you’re not up to the conversation

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.