But it isn't completely done. Lockdowns could easily happen again, and be even more damaging than before. Although Partygate turned many people against the idea of future restrictions, that will be forgotten before long. The government has set a precedent that they can "protect" us from some external danger with lockdown, and any consequences of this do not matter at all. I can't think of a single politician who has wholeheartedly condemned lockdowns, and admitted that prolonged lockdowns caused massive, massive damage. We have seen how easily the government can use the power of the media to frighten the public into accepting a draconian regime with no resistance at all. Even now, there is a tacit agreement between government and opposition of "we don't talk about lockdown, only the pandemic". I will not believe that the threat of lockdown is "over" until there are some widespread and very public admissions from lockdown's cheerleaders that it caused incredible damage, and that in future, we must do everything we can to prevent LOCKDOWNS happening again.
And I'm not holding my breath for the outcome of the enquiry having anything to say about the damage caused by lockdown being totally disproportionate to the threat. For all we know, the conclusion was written before the enquiry was even commissioned: "We should have locked down harder, faster, longer, and we will next time."
Made worse because the likes of police, council officials and security staff were applying "laws" which didn't even exist. Even they didn't understand the difference between law, guidance and "good ideas". It was all a complete farce. Some police even managed to issue fixed penalty notices for "offences" which didn't exist - heaven knows how they managed that! It's hard not to believe that the waters were deliberately muddied here, to keep the public confused, frightened, and bickering among themselves. And what did Boris say later? "People should not have believed that the rules were there to be kept.", or something like that.