Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Lucy Letby press conference

1000 replies

Viviennemary · 04/02/2025 10:27

There is a press conference going on now trying to get Lucy Letby's conviction overturned. From what I read the guilty verdict was sound. All those ill babies dying when she was alone with them. Just a coincidence? Already been refused an appeal.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
FlowerUser · 05/02/2025 10:53

The tragedy is that so many babies died because, as was stated yesterday, 'across all 17 cases, there was a combination of babies being “in the wrong place, delivered in the wrong place, delayed diagnosis and inappropriate or absent treatment”'.

When their parents were told they were murdered, it compounded their loss. Rather than acknowledge that the care was substandard, they looked for other reasons and settled on Letby because of the shift patterns. They failed to include all babies who had died in the NICU and if they had included then they would have seen that it wasn't a statistical anomaly that Letby was on duty.

They had sacked experienced NICU nurses because they cost money. There weren't appropriate doctors around and each nurse had more patients than was safe. And the ward was dirty because of the sewage leaks.

Very premature babies die. My DSC was on a ward when barely viable. Two other babies at the same gestation died. My DSC suffered life-threatening conditions more than once and suffers from that to this day.

This doesn't make Letby a murderer. A terrible miscarriage of justice has occurred and Letby has suffered and the parents have suffered too.

I hope that the parents can gain some solace by knowing their children weren't murdered. I hope Letby can be released and live some kind of normal life.

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 10:55

@chouxchoux and how much is being paid to these "experts"? It's absolutely disgusting that she is being allowed to traumatise these families again. She admitted she did it.

CarefulN0w · 05/02/2025 10:55

Is adequate care for women with pregnancy complications and premature deliveries worth taxpayer money?

Is adequate care of premature babies and neonates worth taxpayer money?

If the care of the mothers and babies had been of an acceptable standard, it is possible that some of the babies would still be alive. Instead, it's looking like it was the system that killed them.

chouxchoux · 05/02/2025 10:56

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 10:55

@chouxchoux and how much is being paid to these "experts"? It's absolutely disgusting that she is being allowed to traumatise these families again. She admitted she did it.

Not a single penny. They all worked pro-bono.

Can I suggest you do a bit of reading/research?

FlowerUser · 05/02/2025 10:57

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 10:55

@chouxchoux and how much is being paid to these "experts"? It's absolutely disgusting that she is being allowed to traumatise these families again. She admitted she did it.

She didn't admit anything. She wrote out her fears as suggested by her therapist.

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:05

She admitted that she killed them. She said it was her fault. She was there for all these deaths.

Could you look these parents in the eyes and say you think their children's killer should be freed, because some bloke from America says so?

Signalbox · 05/02/2025 11:05

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 10:55

@chouxchoux and how much is being paid to these "experts"? It's absolutely disgusting that she is being allowed to traumatise these families again. She admitted she did it.

They aren't being paid according to reports. They are acting out of concern that LL has been wrongly convicted and that there is a cover-up happening at a hospital in terms of negligence and poor practice.

EasternStandard · 05/02/2025 11:08

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:05

She admitted that she killed them. She said it was her fault. She was there for all these deaths.

Could you look these parents in the eyes and say you think their children's killer should be freed, because some bloke from America says so?

@FlowerUser is correct. The note is not admitting it

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:09

What else does "I did this" mean?

These were not written down in a notebook in a way that would suggest they were the product of therapy. They were scrawled messages. She took documents home. She killed babies and some people want her freed, for what reason?

Signalbox · 05/02/2025 11:11

Could you look these parents in the eyes and say you think their children's killer should be freed, because some bloke from America says so?

Dr Lee is not just "some bloke" he is a preeminent paediatrician who is saying that his research has been misrepresented in the trial. Obviously he couldn't fail to come forward to put things right. Imagine if your research had been used to lock someone up for life but you believed it had been misrepresented. Would you not come forward?

thatsalad · 05/02/2025 11:13

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:09

What else does "I did this" mean?

These were not written down in a notebook in a way that would suggest they were the product of therapy. They were scrawled messages. She took documents home. She killed babies and some people want her freed, for what reason?

The reason is there is no evidence the babies were actually murdered. It's the people responsible for the hospital being negligent and dirty that should be in prison

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:14

If it was gross negligence manslaughter that would have been shown at the trial.

Halycon · 05/02/2025 11:14

Signalbox · 05/02/2025 11:05

They aren't being paid according to reports. They are acting out of concern that LL has been wrongly convicted and that there is a cover-up happening at a hospital in terms of negligence and poor practice.

That’s correct. Dr Lee confirmed in the press conference that nobody received any money, gifts in kind or any other form of payment. He said even his travel expenses to get to the PC were self-funded.

chouxchoux · 05/02/2025 11:15

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:05

She admitted that she killed them. She said it was her fault. She was there for all these deaths.

Could you look these parents in the eyes and say you think their children's killer should be freed, because some bloke from America says so?

He's Canadian by naturalisation, Singapore born.

The parents have no interest in what I (or you) think.

Springsareup · 05/02/2025 11:18

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:09

What else does "I did this" mean?

These were not written down in a notebook in a way that would suggest they were the product of therapy. They were scrawled messages. She took documents home. She killed babies and some people want her freed, for what reason?

'I did this' could mean
'I know I should have been more forceful that the doctor listen to me'
'I should have ignored advice I was given and followed my training' '
'I should have told the parents to demand a second opinion'
'I should have refused to work in this hospital and contributed to the situation'
'I should have whistleblown'
We don't know what she meant by it but we cannot be sure it was a confession of murder.

For someone that seems to know very little about the details of anything relating to this case, how can ypu be so sure she killed the babies?

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:20

She was found guilty. That means factually and legally, she murdered them. Her appeals have been denied. She is guilty.

MotionIntheOcean · 05/02/2025 11:21

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:05

She admitted that she killed them. She said it was her fault. She was there for all these deaths.

Could you look these parents in the eyes and say you think their children's killer should be freed, because some bloke from America says so?

It's a touch gross the way some posters are treating the parents as an argumentative device. We have no idea what any of them think on this issue, nor are we entitled to that information, and they're not a hivemind.

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:23

@MotionIntheOcean it is not gross for me, as a woman whose baby is currently on SCBU, to be angry that people think this woman should be let out of prison.

MotionIntheOcean · 05/02/2025 11:26

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:23

@MotionIntheOcean it is not gross for me, as a woman whose baby is currently on SCBU, to be angry that people think this woman should be let out of prison.

As a woman who also had a baby in SCBU, that doesn't entitle any of us to try and speak for the bereaved parents. We don't know what they think, nor is there any reason why we ought to, nor should anyone expect that they all hold the same views.

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:27

@MotionIntheOcean their babies were murdered. You want them to go through the trauma of that again, because this sick woman wants to be in the public eye again for a trial?

MotionIntheOcean · 05/02/2025 11:29

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:27

@MotionIntheOcean their babies were murdered. You want them to go through the trauma of that again, because this sick woman wants to be in the public eye again for a trial?

I want you not to decide you know what they want, what would be best for them and what would constitute the least trauma for them. If you want to argue against any further action being taken on this case, you can do that without commandeering people you don't speak for.

GloriousBlue · 05/02/2025 11:30

I'm always baffled at how trusting the general public is

Comments like "If she's been convicted, she must have done it" and "if the hospital was negligent, this would have been uncovered at trial".

You guys have FAR too much faith in the system. Quite worrying.

Signalbox · 05/02/2025 11:31

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:20

She was found guilty. That means factually and legally, she murdered them. Her appeals have been denied. She is guilty.

You do know that miscarriages of justice happen don't you? People locked up for 20+ years for crimes that they haven't committed?

Springsareup · 05/02/2025 11:32

oneofmeiscutebuttwothough · 05/02/2025 11:27

@MotionIntheOcean their babies were murdered. You want them to go through the trauma of that again, because this sick woman wants to be in the public eye again for a trial?

If she didn't do it, don't you think the parents deserve to know the truth rather than being lied to? And if the babies died due to poor care, isn't this in the best interests of everyone to be addressed rather than brushed under the carpet and carry on happening?

MotionIntheOcean · 05/02/2025 11:33

GloriousBlue · 05/02/2025 11:30

I'm always baffled at how trusting the general public is

Comments like "If she's been convicted, she must have done it" and "if the hospital was negligent, this would have been uncovered at trial".

You guys have FAR too much faith in the system. Quite worrying.

It's even worse than that, there are people who think the mere existence of charges mean someone must be guilty. And some of them find their way onto juries.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.