Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Super yacht sinking - did the crew bravely survive or did they abandon their the passengers

833 replies

mids2019 · 24/08/2024 08:15

So....most of the crew survived this tragedy but the passengers died. Do you think it will emerge the crew should have e done more to alrt the passengers and indeed put their lives in danger to attempt a rescue? Maybe it was all just too fast?

I just think there seems silence from the crew at moment despite being survivors of a sinking vessel who have a story to tell. Are lawyers advising they stay quiet on this?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
22
oakleaffy · 25/08/2024 22:51

MidnightLibraryCard · 25/08/2024 22:16

I agree. The divers who went down had a line attached from the surface to the vessel so they knew exactly where to go. They still only had 12 mins inside on each dive. And that was when it was settled, and they were not in shock, and had appropriate equipment, cameras, clothing, and a team of them working together, oxygen tanks etc.

The idea someone woken in shock in their pyjamas (not diving gear!) by the sea rushing in at force into a sinking ship, in panic and with no equipment and likely no experience of diving (and with some of those who perished being in their 70s) is ridiculous at best.

Some of the comments on this thread are totally clueless.

In the MV Princess Victoria Ferry disaster, there were some passengers who were too old and frail - and terribly seasick- to be able to shift themselves from a listing ferry - they actually chose to be on the ferry as she foundered.

The young Crew tried their hardest, to no avail.

This is a very tragic report by survivors.

A lovely stewardess was last seen trying to help a 3 yr child.

MidnightLibraryCard · 25/08/2024 22:53

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Vile

MidnightLibraryCard · 25/08/2024 22:54

@oakleaffy this is in no way comparable to ferry sinkings or sinkingy of large ships, which usually happen over several hours.

rosesyrup · 25/08/2024 22:58

Lunde · 24/08/2024 19:05

Yeah but it's not like that in real life as we know from the inquiry into the sinking of the Estonia in September 1994 where around 900 people died (mostly Swedes and Estonians).

The radar imaging shows the actual time the ship/boat disappears under the surface but many boats are not escapable for that length of time. Boats do not usually take on water and sink horizontally. Usually water tips the boat sideways, and causes listing.

The Estonia disaster showed that once the boat lists and takes on water (60 to 90 degrees in the case of Estonia) it is almost impossible to escape. There are no longer flat floors to walk along. The stairwells become waterfalls in the wrong direction and water pours through the ceilings. Furniture and furnishings get thrown or float to block or impede exits. Windows and portholes can implode in the pressure and external doors and covers can be ripped off. Evacuation may be in pitch black if the power fails or there is the danger of people being electrocuted from electrical items in the water.

The Estonia disaster showed that only those on the upper decks had any chance of escaping.

The Estonia was an 11-storey cruiseferry. The Bayesian was a sloop - a very big one - but still a sloop.

MidnightLibraryCard · 25/08/2024 22:59

@HazelPlayer yes, I made all of those points myself.

ShinyAppleDreamingOfTheSea · 25/08/2024 22:59

BettyBardMacDonald · 24/08/2024 19:37

Kind of a tangent but: given the risks to the rescue divers, I wonder if we should rethink the impulse to retrieve the bodies from horrid events like this.

What's the point, once it's ascertained that there were no survivors? I would hate for somene to risk her or his life to dive underwater to hoist my corpse out of a dangerous location. Might as well let the sea life take care of it and contribute my cells as food for other organisms.

Surely they have to be legally identified ? Imagine the conspiracy theories if they weren't .

oakleaffy · 25/08/2024 23:07

MidnightLibraryCard · 25/08/2024 22:54

@oakleaffy this is in no way comparable to ferry sinkings or sinkingy of large ships, which usually happen over several hours.

The frailty of some passengers would be the same though- wether a sudden sinking or a slower one.

It's no surprise that young, fit men are the most usual survivors of ships sinking - even down to having the core strength to able to haul themselves into a life raft.

MidnightLibraryCard · 25/08/2024 23:07

Italian law is that all unexpected deaths have to be investigated. The bodies are part of the evidence so aside from the families' needs to know what happened, I presume that legally they had to be recovered if possible.

The boat will also need to be recovered if possible as part of the investigation to ensure every piece of evidence into what happened that is recoverable is examined, hence the chief prosecutor saying his investigation into the matter won't be concluded until the shipwreck is recovered (and that is aside from the environmental concerns given the very large fuel tanks on board that can't be left on the seabed to degrade).

If only our police were as thorough in following all possible lines of enquiry when a potential criminal matter comes to their attention and ensuring they obtained all available evidence before closing a case.

MidnightLibraryCard · 25/08/2024 23:10

@oakleaffy that's true in most cases but in this particular case because of the speed at which the boat sank the determining factor of survival was whether the person was above or below deck at the time of the sinking.

rosesyrup · 25/08/2024 23:12

MidnightLibraryCard · 25/08/2024 23:10

@oakleaffy that's true in most cases but in this particular case because of the speed at which the boat sank the determining factor of survival was whether the person was above or below deck at the time of the sinking.

What I don't understand - well, one of the many things I don't understand - is why they were not all roused and gathered to the emergency gathering point as soon as the storm hit. The boat sank quickly but there was some time between the storm hitting and the sinking.

MidnightLibraryCard · 25/08/2024 23:21

Boris Johnson disagreed and suggested that they were pushing forward the bounds of human endeavour.

Lord of the logic of Brexit. Or course he did. 🤦🏻‍♀️ There will always be idiots. The problem is that idiots listen to other idiots and believe them.

MidnightLibraryCard · 25/08/2024 23:26

@rosesyrup nobody understands that, or whythe engines weren't switched on when the boat had been dragging anchor for 15 mins before the sinking which would have set off alarms for the crew, or how such a vessel that was designed to right itself from almost a 90 degree angle if safety procedures were followed (hatches closed and keel down) could have sunk even in extreme weather. That's why there's an investigation, to find out what other factors in addition to the extreme weather caused the sinking: it seems totally implausible that even a freak weather event alone would have been sufficient without some other contributory factors as well so the investigation is trying to establish what they were.

MidnightLibraryCard · 25/08/2024 23:34

@blueshoes it's good to see some posters who also have some compassion and humanity. It's quite shocking to have seen some of the comments here. Not just the clueless ones, but also the deeply unpleasant ones like the latest deleted one, expressing joy at these people being dead.

I find it quite worrying that people who could wish this on a group of people they have never met and most likely not even heard of until this week are walking around in society passing for normal humans and none of us, if we met them, would suspect the levels of psychopathy that they must presumably be hiding in their daily interactions and reserve for pouring out online against strangers instead. It's disturbing.

friendlycat · 25/08/2024 23:44

I haven’t seen the comments that were deleted but am presuming they were vile.

I agree with the person above that there are some awful people on this forum who seem to hate anybody who is rich, ignoring that they are self made people who have made their fortunes.

I have deep compassion for the survivors of this tragedy and those that lost their lives. The terror and horror of the circumstances for those that died is unimaginable. This wasn’t an instantaneous death but one of horror. That poor girl alone stranded in her cabin and the other five in another one.

Society is very broken if there are those that can’t show compassion for anybody dying in awful circumstances whether they have wealth or not.

1dayatatime · 26/08/2024 00:00

@CatAndHisKit

The yacht sank in 50 metres of water. Now most scuba tanks are 12 litres but let's say you go for an extra large 15 litre tank.

At that depth it would last 21 minutes assuming a resting action. So to last for two days you would need to keep 137 extra large scuba tanks per passenger in each cabin or 274 for two passengers, all assuming of course you can switch tanks safely each time with no air and in the dark 137 times.

Newstarts1 · 26/08/2024 00:21

I haven’t RTFT since I last posted so I didn’t see the deleted posts, but looking at some of the recent posts I would say that if anyone has commented expressing joy at the billionaires dying it’s sad yes but surely not surprising or shocking ?

I mean we had hundreds of people try to burn refugees to death in hotels recently and thousands more cheering them on from behind their keyboards.

And if anything I’d say that’s more a sign of a deeply unhealthy broken society.

MidnightLibraryCard · 26/08/2024 00:28

@Newstarts1 I don't understand your comment.

Anybody involved in that is clearly devoid of any morals and unfit to be part of society. Anybody making commenfs that they are happy these people died is equally vile. And yes, I do find it shocking that there are apparently so many such people around.

One week race and people being too poor is the excuse, the next it is people being too rich. Apparently nobody should expect basic himan decency or compassion or has the right to be alive even unless they happen to be exactly like these posters: born in the same place, and have exactly the right amount of money, not more or less.

Such people are reprehensible and disgusting and it's horrible to realise just how prevalent they are.

MidnightLibraryCard · 26/08/2024 00:32

In fact, some of the comments on this thread have been in the ballpark of those that have led to prison sentences recently in respect of the riots, so perhaps people should think twice about it even if they have no moral decency.

A good start would be for mumsnet to permanently ban such posters and actually report their identities and comments to the police, when the type of thing that's been contained in these comments is posted, especially knowing that families of those who perished are grieving.

Newstarts1 · 26/08/2024 00:35

MidnightLibraryCard · 26/08/2024 00:28

@Newstarts1 I don't understand your comment.

Anybody involved in that is clearly devoid of any morals and unfit to be part of society. Anybody making commenfs that they are happy these people died is equally vile. And yes, I do find it shocking that there are apparently so many such people around.

One week race and people being too poor is the excuse, the next it is people being too rich. Apparently nobody should expect basic himan decency or compassion or has the right to be alive even unless they happen to be exactly like these posters: born in the same place, and have exactly the right amount of money, not more or less.

Such people are reprehensible and disgusting and it's horrible to realise just how prevalent they are.

My point is simply that it’s horrible but not surprising at all. There were riot apologists all over MN that week.

This is our society.

SheilaFentiman · 26/08/2024 00:36

Mumsnet could (and does) ban posters - but the comments, whilst vile, were not criminal and would be of no police interest.

MidnightLibraryCard · 26/08/2024 00:42

Wishing people were killed and expressing glee at the prospect is inciting hatred and at least one person was given a prison sentence for this alone recently.

Anyway, this is all rather a distraction from the topic and I hope Mumsnet will deal appropriate with the two or more posters who I've seen such comments from on the thread, before they were deleted, and any others who have done similar. I am off to bed now but hope that as a minimum those posters are thoroughly ashamed of themselves and won't be coming back to the site.

SheilaFentiman · 26/08/2024 00:53

“and at least one person was given a prison sentence for this alone recently.”

Which specific person/comment did you have in mind? If it was linked to the race riots, then the inciting hatred part would have been in respect of encouraging harassment and violence in that context, I suspect. Rather than plain nasty comments as were made here.

Anyway, sleep well.

Calliopespa · 26/08/2024 01:03

AnnieMcFanny · 24/08/2024 19:06

I caused a smoke alarm to go off in a hotel a few weeks ago. After a couple of minutes of the smoke alarm the fire alarms went off. Ive never heard a noise like it. It was bedlam. My apartment was on the ground floor of the hotel, serviced apartments actually, and I was out very quickly in my nightie and I’ll never forget the sight of people coming out even 10 minutes after all hell let loose dressed for the day and some of them even carrying their belongings. When it was known that it had been a false alarm (id just very badly burned something in a microwave) I’ve no idea why 90% of people on the pavement went back to their rooms given they were dressed for the day including hats and gloves and they could easily have started their sightseeing there and then. I even said to the Manager - why are they going back to their rooms, they’re all up and dressed now.

Annie McFannie! You HAVE been causing trouble! 🤣

Carebearsonmybed · 26/08/2024 08:00

Regardless of any criminal investigations Angela Bacares will be sued by the victim's families.

As the owner she is responsible for the boat & the crew.

There'll be another long battle between her & the manufacturer (or their insurers) over liability.

I wonder if this will have an impact on the super yacht market? They certainly won't be as appealing to billionaires now.

Swipe left for the next trending thread