Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Dd hit car whilst riding her bike

1000 replies

Sfuandtired · 22/04/2024 21:48

Dd 17 has collided with a car tonight whilst riding her bike, she was crossing the road and from what I can make out didn’t see the car turning, she hit the car with her wheel leaving a dent and was thrown over the handle bars banging her head on the window, the driver got out, asked if she was ok, took her name and phone number, then said he was late for work and drove of!
Dd has since had a text saying she will be sent a bill and bank details for the damage to the car! WWYD?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
BronwenTheBrave · 23/04/2024 12:24

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:24

Except they didn’t leave the scene of an accident and no one was injured

That’s just details. The principle is the same.

Newpancake92 · 23/04/2024 12:25

aperolspritzbasicbitch · 23/04/2024 12:21

I can't actually tell if this is satire?!

Same.
And I'm really afraid it's not satire 😳

Calliopespa · 23/04/2024 12:26

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:24

Except they didn’t leave the scene of an accident and no one was injured

She’s slammed her head. Injured doesn’t mean dead.

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:28

BronwenTheBrave · 23/04/2024 12:24

That’s just details. The principle is the same.

It’s not just details if they didn’t commit the crime 😂😂

Its like my saying to you “You shoplifted and shoplifters can go to jail” and you replying “But I didn’t shoplift” and me saying “That’s just details, the principle is the same” 🤣

umberelladay · 23/04/2024 12:29

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:14

The Highway Code does not stipulate that pedestrians can walk into cars without looking and then blame the driver

And that law still requires pedestrians to stop BTW. They have right of way not a right to just step out without looking

The pedestrian would win. Plus I'm struggling to see how a pedestrian could hit the side of a car without being at the kerbside (waiting to cross, ready to cross) That's why when you do your driving test you are taught to look for potential hazards.

Your insurance wouldn't fight it!

You can argue the toss all day but it would be your fault. There's always a difference between what is allowed and what actually happens in reality.

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:29

Calliopespa · 23/04/2024 12:26

She’s slammed her head. Injured doesn’t mean dead.

Injured in this case means needs medical attention.

Which she didn’t need

What was he actually meant to do - hold her against her will while he rang a doctor? Bundle her in his car?

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:31

umberelladay · 23/04/2024 12:29

The pedestrian would win. Plus I'm struggling to see how a pedestrian could hit the side of a car without being at the kerbside (waiting to cross, ready to cross) That's why when you do your driving test you are taught to look for potential hazards.

Your insurance wouldn't fight it!

You can argue the toss all day but it would be your fault. There's always a difference between what is allowed and what actually happens in reality.

OMG

If a car was stationary at a junction and a pedestrian slammed into the side of it no insurance or judge would consider that the driver’s fault. Having right of way does it mean they have no right to take responsibility

You have demonstrated you know fuck all but keep the posts coming, it’s certainly enhancing my li ch hour entertainment

MrsSlocombesCat · 23/04/2024 12:31

It’s an offence to leave the scene of an accident. Let the police deal with it.

WarshipRocinante · 23/04/2024 12:33

MrsSlocombesCat · 23/04/2024 12:31

It’s an offence to leave the scene of an accident. Let the police deal with it.

No, it isn’t. You can leave the scene all
you like after checking if anyone needs medical attention (and staying and getting the help if it’s needed) and exchanging details.

umberelladay · 23/04/2024 12:33

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:18

Accidents happen when people are blatantly careless and sometimes accidents can be fatal.

A pedestrian on a pedestrians marked pavement should not except cyclists going like the clapper round the corner they’re about to turn. Even if there’s a shared use path, cyclist are faster therefore they should slow down

Seriously there’s a massive hedge the DD can’t see around, how on Earth can you excuse her going so fast when a vulnerable person could be turning that corner?

At no point has OP said she was cycling fast. You made that up.

umberelladay · 23/04/2024 12:36

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:31

OMG

If a car was stationary at a junction and a pedestrian slammed into the side of it no insurance or judge would consider that the driver’s fault. Having right of way does it mean they have no right to take responsibility

You have demonstrated you know fuck all but keep the posts coming, it’s certainly enhancing my li ch hour entertainment

😂 I can just imaging the damage from a human walking into a parked metal car.

Slamming into the car...causing serious damage, needing to go to court to resolve it....😂😂😂😂

AE9766 · 23/04/2024 12:36

Nextweektoo · 23/04/2024 06:36

She is 17, the driver hit a child with their car. Call the Police and advise driver go through insurance. Accept no liability at this time.

"Won't somebody think of the children!!"

FFS, no he didn't. The "child" - a 17-year-old almost adult - rode into the side of his car because she's an idiot who was cycling recklessly and illegally on the pavement.
Are you this ridiculous and dramatic in every day life?

Anonymous2025 · 23/04/2024 12:37

You need to pay damages . It’s the right thing to do . Personally I would have waited for the police just to have a record but the reality is if it’s your child’s fault then damages should be paid . Check your home insurance and maybe consider getting bike insurance if she uses it often .
If you refuse he will probably take you to small claims court and you will end up paying costs .
personally I would do the right thing . It’s unfair your child caused potentially hindered or thousands of pounds in damages and you don’t see that is unfair

Rainraindontgoaway · 23/04/2024 12:37

I would tell him to sod off, this is what insurance is there for. Also remind him that he should not of left the scene of an accident where injuries were sustained, regardless of whose fault it was.

Anonymous2025 · 23/04/2024 12:38

MrsSlocombesCat · 23/04/2024 12:31

It’s an offence to leave the scene of an accident. Let the police deal with it.

They exchanged detail so it’s not a offence .

AE9766 · 23/04/2024 12:38

BronwenTheBrave · 23/04/2024 12:20

Since it was a man driving, presumably he was speeding and so it is entirely his fault. He will be lucky not to lose his licence for hitting a small child and running off without calling the emergency services.

Christ. How do people this dim manage to function on a daily basis?

They walk among us, folks.

AE9766 · 23/04/2024 12:41

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Why on earth have you posted this on someone else's thread about a completely different subject?

Msmumm · 23/04/2024 12:41

It was her fault. You need to do the decent thing and pay for his car to be repaired. Tell her not to cycle on a footpath where she can't see what it coming in future too. It could have been a small child or a pram she collided with and the outcome for them could have been much worse.

Woohow · 23/04/2024 12:41

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 11:45

Even if it was a shared cycleway, the cyclist has to slow down approaching a junction not just carry on! Road markings will indicate that too.

Just imagine a child coming round the corner. Is it ok just to plough on and hit them because it’s a share cycleway

Technically if cycleway markings end - which they do before junctions - she is on the pavement, and she should be.

Its a red herring

Road users going straight on do not give way to side roads. Sometimes they may if the markings indicate this but it is not always the case.

This gives good information on the new laws and clarifications about priorities New guidance on shared use routes | Cycling UK

New guidance on shared use routes | Cycling UK

A new guidance note from the Department for Transport on shared use routes for pedestrians and cyclists has been published. Cycling UK and other user groups had previously submitted comments. Although it improves the situation a little, major problems...

https://www.cyclinguk.org/article/campaign-article/new-guidance-on-shared-use-routes

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:42

MrsSlocombesCat · 23/04/2024 12:31

It’s an offence to leave the scene of an accident. Let the police deal with it.

He didn’t leave the scene of an accident.

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:42

umberelladay · 23/04/2024 12:33

At no point has OP said she was cycling fast. You made that up.

Fast enough to not stop in time on a pavement is too fast

Delphiniumandlupins · 23/04/2024 12:43

umberelladay · 23/04/2024 12:33

At no point has OP said she was cycling fast. You made that up.

Well she was going fast enough to dent the car. And fast enough to possibly injure herself, although probably not.

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:43

AE9766 · 23/04/2024 12:36

"Won't somebody think of the children!!"

FFS, no he didn't. The "child" - a 17-year-old almost adult - rode into the side of his car because she's an idiot who was cycling recklessly and illegally on the pavement.
Are you this ridiculous and dramatic in every day life?

17 and 14 months as well 🤣🤣

I find the “she’s a child” protestations odd.

So if she turns 18 tomorrow is she suddenly fully liable and responsible but she wasn’t yesterday? Legally he’s but morally is that what people teach their kids?

YaMuvva · 23/04/2024 12:44

Woohow · 23/04/2024 12:41

Road users going straight on do not give way to side roads. Sometimes they may if the markings indicate this but it is not always the case.

This gives good information on the new laws and clarifications about priorities New guidance on shared use routes | Cycling UK

But she’s not a road user she was on the pavement.

Cherryon · 23/04/2024 12:45

Sfuandtired · 22/04/2024 22:26

Dd was on the pavement, crossing over to the other side of the road, she said that there was quite a large hedge so they possibly both didn’t see the other, do you think I should make contact with the driver or block him?

I’ve read your updates OP and the driver was clearly at fault for the accident, not your DD. She was travelling along the main road, and he was in a side road. He should have watched for her. I agree with making a report to the police. U would also get have DD see her GP to be assessed for a head injury/concussion as a mild TBI can occur in such an accident which can weeks later cause significant health problems. This can happen even if wearing a cycle helmet as the TBI occurs from the brain hitting the inside of the skull.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.