@cariadlet
Thank you for your thoughtful response. I had a read. It's agree it’s valid to recognise chiropractic's historical roots and the unfortunate instances where harm has occurred. However, it's essential to consider that healthcare practices evolve over time, and modern chiropractic is guided by scientific evidence and research.
Take the history of medicine and bloodletting - believed to balance the body’s humors. However, these practices laid the foundation for modern techniques and understanding of anatomy.
While one of the articles you referenced is from now arguably outdated (2011), newer studies I mentioned earlier by neurophysicist Heidi Haavik might provide a more up-to-date understanding of chiropractic.
It’s founder may have had spiritual beliefs, contemporary chiropractic is definitely grounded in anatomy, physiology, and neurology. Additionally, adverse events can happen with any medical intervention, but proper regulation and training aim to minimise risks and ensure patient safety.
Despite potential risks, and the recent research says this is very small, chiropractic is fully regulated and recognised as primary healthcare in the UK, with legally protected titles. This suggesting its legitimacy, does it not, despite differing views?
Anyway, I write this as personally I have had really great results using chiropractors as part of my ongoing healthcare.