I’m a feminist academic who thinks my field, which is female-dominated, uses specialist terms among peers, like all fields where peers are talking to peers who share specialised knowledge.
There’s nothing any more elitist about it than if two plumbers are talking together about a job and using the jargon of their field of specialism. No one is ‘talking down’ to anyone, precisely because everyone involved speaks the specialist idiom of the field of training.
They would obviously use a different, less specialised register if talking to non-plumbers/ incoming first year students who haven’t begun to acquire the necessary skill set yet, or, say, doing a TV programme where you’re disseminating research to the general public. The top students have acquired by the end of their degree.
It certainly doesn’t involve misogyny. It’s the language of a feminist research field. And you’re saying more about your own psychological makeup than that of the people you’re describing when you start speculating wildly about their emotional deficiency or sadism.
Clearly, it’s a pity if you’ve been in a situation in which you don’t understand the language register being used, but surely it makes sense to recognise that you’re just a poor match for the situation, rather than decide it’s everyone else’s fault for being elitist or misogynist.
Threads like this make me realise there’s a strong strand of anti-intellectualism in British culture. Even the words ‘clever’ or ‘intelligent’ makes a vocal minority froth with accusations of elitism and emotional deficiency hidden by pseudo intellectual armour, and an apparently unthinking equation of high intelligence with low emotional intelligence.