Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Should or will Labour abolish Grammar Schools?

304 replies

redexrt123 · 11/03/2024 13:24

So Labour have already confirmed that they will add VAT to private school fees as one of their key tax policies. Firstly they hope to raise revenue to fund improvements in state schools. Secondly, many in Labour are ideologically opposed to private schools as they believe they create two tier educational system that fosters social inequality, as most parents simply do not have the option to send their kids private. One of the problems with the new policy from a tax revenue perspective, is that some, perhaps many, parents who can just about afford current fees may decide to send their kids to State school. This could be just for primary or sixth form or could be for their full education. In any event the new policy is likely to increase the demand for state schooling. In particular as head teachers of grammar schools have already indicated, it is likely to increase the demand for entry into grammar schools. As grammar schools have a selective intake, they tend to have the best exam results in the state sector (although not nessarily the best Attainment 8 scores) making them an attractive alternative to private education for many. Labour have not stated that they will abolish Grammar schools (by which I mean abolish selective academic entry) but they have been and still are opposed to the creation of new Grammar schools. Indeed many of the reasons why the Left are opposed to Private schools apply equally to Grammar schools. They create a two -tier educational system. Grammars have less poorer students (i.e. Kids on free school meals) than your typical comprehensive. Richer parents can game entry for their children as they can more readily afford private tuition for entrance exams.

So do you think Labour should turn Grammar schools into comprehensives? More importantly, do you think they will do so in the next parliament?

OP posts:
Allthegoodusernamesweretaken · 11/03/2024 13:26

Historically, Labour don’t seem to have a problem with grammar or private schools for their own DC though. Another case of do what I say, not what I do?

LakeTiticaca · 11/03/2024 13:53

Labour doesn't like success. They want to keep everyone down at the bottom, rather than climb the ladder of success

LarkspurLane · 11/03/2024 14:02

Allthegoodusernamesweretaken · 11/03/2024 13:26

Historically, Labour don’t seem to have a problem with grammar or private schools for their own DC though. Another case of do what I say, not what I do?

They aren't getting rid of private schools, only adding VAT.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Mum1976Mum · 11/03/2024 14:05

I remember being at a lovely grammar in the 90s and the constant worry about Labour closing then. I have no doubt that they will. They like to level everyone down. They’ll start with private schools then grammar.

x2boys · 11/03/2024 14:07

LakeTiticaca · 11/03/2024 13:53

Labour doesn't like success. They want to keep everyone down at the bottom, rather than climb the ladder of success

So are you saying if kids don't attend Grammar school ,s they won't be successful ?
You are aware that Grammar schools haven't existed for most of the UK since the 1970,s ?

Spinet · 11/03/2024 14:07

No I don't think they will abolish Grammar Schools.

@LakeTiticaca I am glad you have achieved a level of success that means you can post on Mumsnet at 2pm on a weekday. No doubt you pulled yourself up by the bootstraps from nothing.

Screamingabdabz · 11/03/2024 14:20

They won’t, but they should either expand or disband because at the moment they’re just another instrument of pushy privilege which is so far removed from the original ethos of improving social mobility. They’re now mainly middle class enclaves which do not represent the full social spectrum and are therefore unjustifiable.

accidentalteacher · 03/06/2024 19:14

If grammar schools are still run on the basis of academic ability, there is no guarantee that ex-private school pupils will automatically gain a place.

whiteroseredrose · 03/06/2024 19:39

Allthegoodusernamesweretaken · 11/03/2024 13:26

Historically, Labour don’t seem to have a problem with grammar or private schools for their own DC though. Another case of do what I say, not what I do?

This exactly. Years ago I spoke to our Labour candidate about her thoughts re our local Grammar system. She was definitely against the selective system. Where did her daughters go? The Girl's Grammar.

The one and only time I voted Conservative.

accidentalteacher · 03/06/2024 21:45

An interesting article.

https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/general-election-candidate-selection

"Before a general election, political parties must select a candidate to stand in every seat they plan to contest."

It must be assumed that your Labour candidate wasn't totally averse to a selective system.

Candidates-mcdonnel-2019-election.jpg

Conservative and Labour party selection of UK parliamentary candidates | Institute for Government

How do the Conservatives and Labour choose who will stand for them in elections?

https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/general-election-candidate-selection

ActivePeony · 03/06/2024 21:47

Allthegoodusernamesweretaken · 11/03/2024 13:26

Historically, Labour don’t seem to have a problem with grammar or private schools for their own DC though. Another case of do what I say, not what I do?

Well observed.

noblegiraffe · 03/06/2024 21:50

They haven't said they'll abolish grammar schools. They've said they have no plans to.

ActivePeony · 03/06/2024 21:50

accidentalteacher · 03/06/2024 19:14

If grammar schools are still run on the basis of academic ability, there is no guarantee that ex-private school pupils will automatically gain a place.

You do know that very many independents are academically selective?

accidentalteacher · 03/06/2024 22:16

Yes, I do.

https://www.goodschoolsguide.co.uk/choosing-a-school/independent-schools/uk-independent-schools-explained

Are private schools selective?Some more than others. For a handful of junior schools (mainly in or close to London) the only way to be sure of gaining a place is to put your child’s name down early, although thankfully most schools no longer insist on parents getting their children's name down at birth. The majority in the primary phase take things are a bit more relaxed, with many more rural prep and senior schools happy to take on pupils who can pay the fees.

EmpressOfTheThread · 03/06/2024 22:18

Labour will not get rid of grammar schools.
Stand easy.

Redlocks28 · 03/06/2024 22:23

ActivePeony · 03/06/2024 21:50

You do know that very many independents are academically selective?

Many aren’t as well. We are in a grammar area around here and the local private school is generally mostly pupils who didn’t pass the 11+.

ThursdayTomorrow · 03/06/2024 22:29

A very small number of children attend private schools. An even smaller number will leave after VAT is (quite rightly) introduced.
There are plenty of spaces in state schools for those children that will leave.

Labour will not get rid of grammars but I think they should.

All these constant posts on VAT at private schools aren’t going to achieve anything. There is obviously some kind of online campaign by private school parents going on here on MN but I’m not sure what you hope to achieve. Labour won’t change their minds and they are going to win the election.

LakeTiticaca · 03/06/2024 22:36

Spinet · 11/03/2024 14:07

No I don't think they will abolish Grammar Schools.

@LakeTiticaca I am glad you have achieved a level of success that means you can post on Mumsnet at 2pm on a weekday. No doubt you pulled yourself up by the bootstraps from nothing.

You and me both then since you replied at 14.07 👏👏👏

Spinet · 03/06/2024 22:46

Right. But I don't believe in the mythical 'ladder' of success you say Labour doesn't want anyone to climb. Most successful people in this country are born halfway there already.

Japanesejazz · 03/06/2024 22:55

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Japanesejazz · 03/06/2024 23:06

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

noblegiraffe · 03/06/2024 23:08

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Margaret Thatcher closed more grammar schools when Ed Sec than anyone else.

BoudiccaOfSuburbia · 03/06/2024 23:34

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Maybe had the grammar school not attracted a cohort of high achievers and highly tutored there would have been a critical mass of students focussing on doing well at the comprehensive.

My Dc also “wanted to study, work hard, have the best teaching” and got that at a true comprehensive which did well by kids of all abilities

echt · 03/06/2024 23:37

LakeTiticaca · 11/03/2024 13:53

Labour doesn't like success. They want to keep everyone down at the bottom, rather than climb the ladder of success

No they don't.

ActivePeony · 04/06/2024 08:03

Labour won’t change their minds and they are going to win the election

I think that they will change their minds or at least shelve it for a while - its only a sop to the hard left in any case. They might win the election but not by a huge majority. They are going to blow it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread