Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Birth rate hits record low - 1.49 children per woman

453 replies

MidnightPatrol · 23/02/2024 10:46

The ONS has released its latest data on the UK birthrate.

The number of children per women has dropped from 1.55 in 2022 to 1.49 in 2022 - the lowest on record.

This is the lowest number of births in the UK since 2002 - when the population was 10 million people smaller.

Do we think this problem will inevitably worsen? Are there particular reasons people are having less children (unique to the UK vs the rest of the world?).

Should we be taking steps to increase it / stop it reducing further?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
MrsSkylerWhite · 25/02/2024 12:45

To use a corny phrase, it is a ticking time bomb for the economy, as older generations live far longer.

What can be done to alleviate it? Rejoin the EU and allow much more immigration of young people who want to work and raise families.

EasternStandard · 25/02/2024 12:48

On tech we’re not going to be able to stop advancement

The best we can do is make sure we’re not overly flooded with unemployed young people and work out how to get enough tax from it

inamarina · 25/02/2024 12:58

thefallen · 23/02/2024 16:38

Apparently every day, globally 220,000 more people are born than die. Our planet can't cope with expanding population indefinitely. The environment is being ruined. So I can't say I'm worried about a drop in the UK birth rate when you look at the world as a whole.

What do you envision for the future pensioners in the UK though? Will ‘the world as a whole’ step in and look after them when they need care?

Gloriosaford · 25/02/2024 13:01

MrsSkylerWhite · 25/02/2024 12:45

To use a corny phrase, it is a ticking time bomb for the economy, as older generations live far longer.

What can be done to alleviate it? Rejoin the EU and allow much more immigration of young people who want to work and raise families.

I don't disagree that more immigration of young people who want to work and raise families would help us in the UK!
However surely all countries are experiencing the same process which will mean there aren't enough young people who want to work and raise families to go around?

Furthermore once people become settled they tend to adopt the norms of the country in which they settle, such as women choosing to remain childless so they can invest in themselves and their earning potential (just like men always have)

inamarina · 25/02/2024 13:09

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 23/02/2024 18:10

Let me retire at 65, have a good 10 years (which is still less than the generation above me) and I'll pop off

DGM said that. 'Put a pillow over my face when I'm 70.' Funnily enough when she hit 70 she wasn't nearly as keen on the idea.

Yes, strange that. Seriously though, my MIL is in her late seventies and not very mobile, but generally a lovely person to be around and she’s definitely enjoying life.

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 25/02/2024 13:11

Firsttimetrier · 25/02/2024 09:53

Happening in London, with more predicted to close in the coming years due to the decline of families in the city.

At least two in South London alone announced last year. One of which has been going since 1699 but the numbers just aren't there in their area.

inamarina · 25/02/2024 13:14

Bobbytazer · 23/02/2024 19:05

That's such a fucking ridiculous thing to say and isn't quite as philosophical as you may think. Nothing NEEDS to be here, including the planet. So if the angle you're going for is "humans are killing the earth so the human race is a parasite to earth", well what good is a planet without a sentient intelligent being to inhabit it? Do animals need to be here? No. Do humans need to be here? No. Does the planet need to be here? No. I hate the state of things which I'm guessing you do too by the way and the fact that evil seems to shine on our planet is abhorrent. But NOTHING needs to exist.

Let's take a second to be thankful we are conscious sentient beings with the ability to think, feel, create, and yes destroy, hurt, etc but we DO exist. And id quite like there to continue being a sentient and able being here to be able to experience the world. If we die and just fishes are left over, why is that preferable to the fishes dying and us being here? Just an example but please, good god, let's not consider ourselves worthy of extinction because we don't "need" to exist. Id argue we need to exist more than anything else because we are the apex predator 1000x more capable and able to build, experience, and appreciate this planet we have been blessed by some extremely rare and strange turn of events to exist on.

Very good point. Nothing needs to exist if we’re going to get really philosophical, including the planet.

Gloriosaford · 25/02/2024 13:14

I thought my dad was a "you'll have to prise the steering wheel out of my cold dead hands" kind of man.
I thought driving was be central to his identity, however he appears to be quite happy to accept that he may need a mobility scooter as he gets older.
When you are young the thought of being elderly may seem terrible, but when you get there you've had a long time to adjust and you may just want to enjoy your life for as long as you can 🤷🏼‍♀️

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 25/02/2024 13:15

inamarina · 25/02/2024 13:09

Yes, strange that. Seriously though, my MIL is in her late seventies and not very mobile, but generally a lovely person to be around and she’s definitely enjoying life.

I wouldn't say that DGM 'enjoyed' life, being, it seems temperamentally incapable of enjoyment unless she was being horrible to someone, but she emigrated to Australia aged 82 and lived for another 10 years. So by no means ready to shuffle off at 70.

inamarina · 25/02/2024 13:21

MorwennaBogtrotter · 23/02/2024 21:05

It matters because the influx of ppl from different countries coupled with declining birth rate will naturally lead to a significant shift in our demographics, culture and political landscape.

It is a grievous oversight to assume that culture will sustain itself effortlessly. Cultures must be nurtured, preserved and actively upheld in order to endure through the ages.

If those who care about feminism, LGB rights and environmentalism don't have children the future of Britain will possibly be less feminist and less environmentalist and less LGB friendly. Maybe even anti-feminist, anti-environmentalist and anti-LGB. Communities that hold opposing views are already continuing to grow in number.

Re those who mention previous waves of migration in the UK through the ages + implying there are no real british people. While I mostly agree re use of the term indigenous, there is a distinct genetic lineage of the British population that has evolved over centuries. Over time the British people have established a Christian based culture (even if many of it today exists unconsciously – it exists) that will crumble under the weight of unintegrated cultures with higher birth rates. Many of our societal systems rely on the unconscious acceptance of Christian principles eg the English political tradition. In the West, Christian principles have led to a clear distinction between church and state, while in some societies, religious and political authority may be more intertwined take for example Sharia law and shape legal systems.

If we had lower birth rates to contend with alone, we could gradually increase them over time, as history has shown during times of war. However, we are now living on the same island with much more people from different cultures that may not align with traditional British values, that are maintaining replacement-level birth rates while our own rates are rapidly declining.

How do we combat this?

I don't know how we combat this. But I do think instilling fear and pressuring women into rushing into childbirth, as the men in Manosphere podcasts might advocate, would only exacerbate existing social issues like DV & poverty.

One potential solution could be to explore a feminist approach that places greater emphasis on the value of Motherhood. As well as policies to help women balance their careers and family aspirations. I think we could benefit from normalising women to return to careers later in life so that those who want to can prioritise starting a family over career advancement.

On a more personal note, I'm one of those unintended childless womwn in my nearly mid 30s who prioritiswd my career over starting a family. Feminism needs to acknowledge that not all women can delay motherhood and still easily conceive in their 30s. We need to strike a balance that allows women to choose their careers without assuming fertility will always be there.

Soz for the essay. 🫖

Quite enjoyed the essay, you’re making some very good points 🙂

inamarina · 25/02/2024 13:26

stayathomer · 23/02/2024 22:16

If there’s anyone here who actually does want to have more children, just to let you know having more than two children is not the dystopian hell you’re seeing on here- we don’t go skiing or wear brands, but am just in bed after a fun games night with dh and 4 kids and tomorrow morning we’re off for a hike with the dog (all free cost wise;)) and, shock horror, we’re generally happy, including me, I don’t feel I’ve lost anything by having children, we’ve gone through gigantic ups and downs but I gained my whole world and regret nothing.

Sounds lovely 😊

inamarina · 25/02/2024 13:38

AnnBerlin24 · 23/02/2024 22:26

I don't disagree with legalised euthanasia but I think you are being very flippant about deciding to end your life. I think a lot of people are, when it's still an abstract, far off, idea. Let's see how you actually feel when you get to 75 yrs old, your children still need you and you adore spending time with your beloved grandchildren. Go and see how easy it is then.

I agree.
I also find it somewhat depressing how PP mentions relatives (including her dad) who according to her occupy houses too big for them, only to talk about legalising euthanasia in her next sentence.
So those people still seem fit enough to live by themselves, but since they’re old (75+, shock horror!) they should just clear off and make room for others?

inamarina · 25/02/2024 13:41

Octomingo · 23/02/2024 23:16

No, I'm not. Death has never frightened me. I've always seen it as a relief, in some ways. And if I'm 75, my eldest child will be 45, so really won't need me. I haven't needed my own parents since I left home. They're currently at the age where they need me. But I'm fucked if I'll have my own kids have to look after me. And based on current trends, I may well not have grandchildren anyway.

I’m 45 and I would be devastated if my mum decided to go.

gingercat02 · 25/02/2024 13:45

inamarina · 25/02/2024 13:41

I’m 45 and I would be devastated if my mum decided to go.

I'm 55, and I hope my mum is still around for as long as possible. I don't need her to be, but I do want it!

Abeona · 25/02/2024 13:46

MrsSkylerWhite · 25/02/2024 12:45

To use a corny phrase, it is a ticking time bomb for the economy, as older generations live far longer.

What can be done to alleviate it? Rejoin the EU and allow much more immigration of young people who want to work and raise families.

Not true. The ONS report on the 2022 census states the following:

  • Life expectancy at birth in the UK in 2020 to 2022 was 78.6 years for males and 82.6 years for females; compared with 2017 to 2019, life expectancy has fallen by 38 weeks from 79.3 years for males and by 23 weeks from 83.0 years for females.
  • Life expectancy improvements have been slow for the last decade, and the latest estimates of life expectancy at birth are back to the same level as 2010 to 2012 for females and slightly below the 2010 to 2012 level for males.
Foolish to say that people will just go on living longer and longer. The wealthy may live longer but men in Glasgow, for example, are lucky to make it to retirement age. Pollution, the effect of ingesting plastics through our food and water, the appearance of new and deadlier versions of viruses, the loss of efficacy of antibiotics — all sorts of reasons why life expectancy can't be guaranteed to keep going up.
Ladamesansmerci · 25/02/2024 14:05

I'm 30 and pregnant with my first baby. I don't know if I will have anymore.

A lot of the women I went to university with do not want children. Mostly due to cost, they'd rather have a career, travel easily, etc, or simply because they don't like them and have no desire to be tied to the home raising a child. I said I didn't want children for years and years and the main reason was down to cost and because I, selfishly or not, wanted my life to be about me. I wanted to do what I want when I wanted. When you have a child a lot of your identity becomes tied up in motherhood- a lot of my friends say that, and it's not the life they want. Lot of people I know also can't stand the thought of having a baby with the way the world currently is. Life in the UK looks pretty bleak. My generation will probably work until we're like 80, global warming isn't going anywhere, the government grows more fascist all the time, we're living in a time of awful cost of living, it's difficult to get on the property ladder, mental health rates continue to climb, the NHS is failing, and so on. Lots of people just don't want to bring a child into that.

I think lots of women just want different things now. And I know you can technically have a career and raise a child, but it's damn hard given the cost of living. There are also factors such as being passed over for promotion due to the chance you may fall pregnant, time taken out of career progression if you do have a baby, and so on.

I'd do anything to stay home and not work for a few years and give my all to my baby, but I can't and will need to return to full time work. The days of one incoming being able to support a household are gone. Childcare fees are extortionate. I have a decent job as a band 6 nurse, and my partner works full time in a bar, and we will very much struggle with one child due to nursery fees. A second one is just financially unimaginable currently.

inamarina · 25/02/2024 14:14

EasternStandard · 25/02/2024 11:12

@inamarina resources will still decrease so keeping things at the numbers we have now will have an impact

Also what do you think the workforce will be like in 18 to 20 years?

Same need for jobs or different due to advances in AI?

I genuinely don’t know how many jobs might be replaced by AI in 10, 15 or 20 years. What do you think?
Do you think all care/ service work will be done by robots? What impact will this have on people’s mental state?

HBGKC · 25/02/2024 14:20

Great post, @MorwennaBogtrotter

BruFord · 25/02/2024 14:21

leonsilva · 25/02/2024 10:10

Half of European families are raising just one child. It wouldn't surprise me if the next generation has two or more in response.

Interesting thought, @leonsilva . I’m an only and thinking about the other only children I know, most have had more than one child. I can think of one who has a single child through choice. Being an only child definitely has pros and cons.

BruFord · 25/02/2024 14:24

Abeona · 25/02/2024 13:46

Not true. The ONS report on the 2022 census states the following:

  • Life expectancy at birth in the UK in 2020 to 2022 was 78.6 years for males and 82.6 years for females; compared with 2017 to 2019, life expectancy has fallen by 38 weeks from 79.3 years for males and by 23 weeks from 83.0 years for females.
  • Life expectancy improvements have been slow for the last decade, and the latest estimates of life expectancy at birth are back to the same level as 2010 to 2012 for females and slightly below the 2010 to 2012 level for males.
Foolish to say that people will just go on living longer and longer. The wealthy may live longer but men in Glasgow, for example, are lucky to make it to retirement age. Pollution, the effect of ingesting plastics through our food and water, the appearance of new and deadlier versions of viruses, the loss of efficacy of antibiotics — all sorts of reasons why life expectancy can't be guaranteed to keep going up.

Yes, @Abeona and tbh, do most people even want to live into their 90’s?

Abeona · 25/02/2024 16:21

No, I don't think I would want to live past my mid-80s judging from family and friends' experiences. Some people age far better than others but I do hope that if I reach that time of life it will be possible to arrange a quick, painless and dignified death to suit me. I used to visit an aunt who died at the age of 95 in 2019. She was cognitively unimpaired — still sharp and reading voraciously in the run-up to her death — but had terrible arthritis and had been unable to walk more than a few steps for years. For the last decade of her life she talked often about wanting to die. The carers did what they could in their snatched visits but she was lonely and in pain.

She eventually died after falling badly. She had a week in hospital in a noisy, chaotic ward where she got very little care. I saw her two days before she died. She'd refused to eat or drink and was really distressed by the loss of dignity. Her last words to me were 'Don't get old.' Perhaps you have to have been through something like this to realise that there are worse things in life than death.

TheABC · 25/02/2024 16:48

I mean, what political party is willing to build a plan to transition to a smaller social model, supporting employment and education transition, redesigning supply chains etc - and then be mad enough to try and get the public to VOTE for it!?

This stood out for me. Our politicians love to dodge the difficult issues - better to do a bit of rabble-rousing about small boats, instead of fixing the larger issues at the Home Office. I can't see anyone planning a transition until it's forced on us and even then, it will be piecemeal.

I'm going to be a broken record on this. Growing old is inevitable. But it does not need to happen in poverty, loneliness and pain. We can and should do a lot more, from more options for shared living to better care arrangements. We also need to incentivise people to look after their health.

At the end of the day, we cannot force the population to have babies and at this stage, even with immigration, we are looking at a top-heavy population pyramid. It would almost certainly be worse without our current migrants. Perhaps we should be sending bouquets to the India, Nigerian and Chinese governments for making our country more appealing than theirs (2023 top migration nationalities, ONS stats).

T1Dmama · 25/02/2024 18:05

Women want careers now, don’t want to stay at home and raise children or have to take time out of their career. Not to mention childcare costs, and managing childcare during school holidays as children get older. And days off for inset days/sickness… it’s a nightmare for mothers and pretty much all my friends have had to take a career break or take a lower grade due to going part time!…
Not many fathers step up… some do, but majority still see their jobs as more important (in my experience anyway!)

T1Dmama · 25/02/2024 18:07

And from an environmental point of view it would be good if couples across the world only had one child…. Cutting the population in half with each generation wouldn’t be a bad thing for our planet!

Famousinlove · 26/02/2024 00:22

fetchacloth · 24/02/2024 18:51

Yes, it certainly has, I agree. Not helped by wages being held at low rates. The minimum wage is so low, that for those with children, this has to be topped up with other benefits.
Someone upthread mentioned that back in earlier years, wages were higher compared to housing costs. That was true and I think people were less reticent about having children back then too.

As more and more women have entered the workplace, businesses have used this to their advantage to not increase wages as much as inflation/housing costs.

30+ years ago, families could easily live on one parents wages, now that more families are two income households, companies are effectively splitting the wage in half so we are no better off today with two people working than our parents were with one.. and in many instances, worse off as house prices are so much higher than incomes so a lot of people (myself included) are buying houses later, meaning leaving having children until later due to stability (owning home), childcare costs and maternity leave etc.