The precedent of naming people on arrest was undermined by the Cliff Richard privacy case and then furthered by the Bloomberg judgment in summer 2022. Both judgments now make it almost impossible for the papers to name somebody on arrest because of the likelihood of them being sued for breach of privacy. That’s why she’s not been named, and why it’s very rare for the papers to name anyone now on arrest.
Privacy rights fall away when the person is charged. In this case, that’s when she’ll be named.
There are no current reporting restrictions on the case, for those asking above. And it’s got nothing to do with her means, it’s just standard privacy law.
I’m a journalist and this law affects us every day. It’s a law that suits very rich celebrities and means that when a public figure is arrested for, say, child abuse or rape, they cannot be named and continue working. Some of those people carry on working in the House of Commons, in high profile charities or in local councils. There’s not a thing we can do about it.
And a delay of more than a year in a case like this is perfectly normal. I was in a death by dangerous driving case last week that was from 2020. Some of the delay was because the analysis of the driver’s phone took nearly a year due to a lack of forensic lab staff and a huge backlog. The criminal justice system is hopelessly understaffed in every area.