Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Retirement for those born after 1970 is likely to rise to 71 in the future

436 replies

Tiddlywinkly · 05/02/2024 12:36

This Guardian article was a tad depressing to read:https://amp.theguardian.com/money/2024/feb/05/uk-state-pension-age-will-soon-need-to-rise-to-71-say-experts

I fully acknowledge that we are living longer, are having less children etc, but for many, our health might not be up to working for that long. There'll also be a knock on effect as to how much we'll be available for helping with grandkids/ very elderly parents.

I just wondered what other people thought?

UK state pension age will soon need to rise to 71, say experts | Retirement age | The Guardian

Research on life expectancy and birth rates shows that ill health makes status quo unsustainable

https://amp.theguardian.com/money/2024/feb/05/uk-state-pension-age-will-soon-need-to-rise-to-71-say-experts

OP posts:
fonfusedm · 05/02/2024 13:15

The article is about research into maintaining the current ratio of workers to pensioners, which indicates the age would need to be 71. But it's not a realistic policy option.

Without younger workers working for longer where will the money come from?

user1497207191 · 05/02/2024 13:15

user8800 · 05/02/2024 12:51

It's shit.
But...I've got relatives who retired at 60/65 and are still going strong at 85/90
Mil has had state pension for 25 years now as has an uncle retired at 65 is now 90
It's just not sustainable
And don't get me started on whether actually they need it...they really don't!!

We really need to means test it in some form so that those who don't "need" it don't get it, or get less.

I'd suggest we use the same £50k income threshold as used for child benefit as a starting point, so that state pension is no longer paid to those who have over £60k of other income, with tapering between £50k-£60k. It is being done for parents claiming child benefit, so can be extended to bring pensioners into the scope.

No one can say that a pensioner with an income over £60k "needs" the state pension!

the80sweregreat · 05/02/2024 13:15

One of my relatives was one of the Waspi women when the retirement age for women was changed ( although she does receive the state pension now)
'(Women against state pension inequality ' )
So many missed out back then.
The thought of retiring at 71 is depressing.
Those doing jobs where you are on a feet a lot or requiring heavy lifting etc will be royally screwed over. I'm not sure it's really fair, but I can see it being brought in at some stage.
Those with very good private pensions will be alright I suppose

NoWordForFluffy · 05/02/2024 13:15

SerendipityJane · 05/02/2024 13:13

I sense a business opportunity. Corporate corpse lockers. Where are the Dragons ?

Will definitely need body bags in the stationery cupboard!

Notcontent · 05/02/2024 13:17

i am not at all surprised but it’s something that is starting to worry me. I currently have a well paying professional job but at 50 I am already older than most of my colleagues. I am in good health and more than happy to work in my 60s but I will need to find a different field to work in. It’s not a choice for me, as due to various upheavals in my life I only have a tiny workplace pension.

fonfusedm · 05/02/2024 13:18

I agree with this. Where were you all when us 50/60 somethings with no maternity leave, low pay, and hardley any warning were pushed from 60 to 67?

I was working hard not understanding why my salary was stagnating & wondering how on earth I would afford a home post 08 lending restrictions. Oh & also lamenting that the very good pension scheme my company offered had closer to new entrants whilst I was at uni.

the80sweregreat · 05/02/2024 13:18

Many younger people I know ( early / mid 20s) are planning on not having any children as childcare costs are huge and they can't see the point
I don't blame them tbh.

Plexie · 05/02/2024 13:19

MrsTingly · 05/02/2024 12:56

Sadly I think this is right. In a sense it’s a return to what pensions were initially supposed to be - financial support to get you through the last few years. It’s only the last few decades (with rising life expectancy and the last private final salary pensions) that it’s been seen as a sort of extended jolly. Rather depressing.

And it also coincided with the cost of products/leisure services/foreign travel becoming cheaper and more abundant, which meant people could lead active and enjoyable retirements.

It would take a massive shift in people's attitude to spending/saving throughout their entire adults lives. But in turn that would affect the economy, as people would spend less. And we'd have to get over the issue of debt propping up a lot of consumer expenditure too.

SerendipityJane · 05/02/2024 13:19

NoWordForFluffy · 05/02/2024 13:15

Will definitely need body bags in the stationery cupboard!

Obviously.

Another marketing opportunity.

Honestly, I can see why the Tories have given up on the UK. Every single opportunity and opening is just talked down by the negative nellies as this thread shows.

fonfusedm · 05/02/2024 13:19

You can retire at whatever age you like if you are happy to fund it yourself , if the country cannot afford to fund it at lower than 71 then there is not much that they can do

Much of the "silver exodus" have left the workplace despite not being able to fund it themselves due to health reasons.

unexpectediteminthebraggingarea · 05/02/2024 13:19

PutMyFootIn · 05/02/2024 13:02

I agree with this. Where were you all when us 50/60 somethings with no maternity leave, low pay, and hardley any warning were pushed from 60 to 67?

Although I wouldn't have been brave enough to actually say it 😀

We were all worrying about how on earth to get on the housing ladder while juggling saving with student loans and high rents and the decline of NHS dentistry. ..

fonfusedm · 05/02/2024 13:20

I’m going to look for the statistic but last week I read that we have something like 330 people retired for every 1000 workers. Previously it had been something like 200.

It's a really big issue which the gov hasn't planned for.

Notcontent · 05/02/2024 13:20

the80sweregreat · 05/02/2024 13:15

One of my relatives was one of the Waspi women when the retirement age for women was changed ( although she does receive the state pension now)
'(Women against state pension inequality ' )
So many missed out back then.
The thought of retiring at 71 is depressing.
Those doing jobs where you are on a feet a lot or requiring heavy lifting etc will be royally screwed over. I'm not sure it's really fair, but I can see it being brought in at some stage.
Those with very good private pensions will be alright I suppose

It’s not just an issue for people doing physical jobs. It’s also an issue for many people in office based private sector jobs that have a very “young” culture.

Goblinmodeactivated · 05/02/2024 13:21

This is utterly depressing. It seems that the big issue is the dramatic reduction in the work force as a result of preventable ill health, I’d really like to see the government do much more to tackle that issue, than simply increase the pension age. It’s simple not realistic to expect everyone to work til 70 or older, many jobs simply can’t be done at that age!

fonfusedm · 05/02/2024 13:22

No one can say that a pensioner with an income over £60k "needs" the state pension!

But they paid their stamp! You will get flamed for the above

InkySplott · 05/02/2024 13:22

I believe eventually everyone will be assessed by a panel to get a state pension. If you are deemed fit enough to carry on then you will have to .

fonfusedm · 05/02/2024 13:22

Many younger people I know ( early / mid 20s) are planning on not having any children as childcare costs are huge and they can't see the point

Hence the birth rates

SerendipityJane · 05/02/2024 13:24

Of course people could just not vote for it

Cattenberg · 05/02/2024 13:26

You could try to prepare for this by opting for a physically undemanding desk job, only to find that at 70, your strength and mobility are fine, but you can’t remember who just phoned you and what they said. Also, your eyesight is no longer good enough to see your computer screen properly.

Regardless of the type of job you have, I think it would be a very sad and depressing end to your career to have to struggle on until you are effectively sacked for underperformance.

the80sweregreat · 05/02/2024 13:26

I suppose if it's mean tested , then fair enough
It'll become the norm to just have a private pension and live on that and the state pension will become a thing of the past
I'm not saying it's right , but I can see it happening

traytablestowed · 05/02/2024 13:27

Tontostitis · 05/02/2024 12:46

Should of helped us fight it more then. I've had 7 years added to my working life despite starting work in a time of no maternity leave and a lifetime of lower pay. I had around ten years to save for the extra 7. Once they robbed us they start robbing you ce la vie, I'd have more sympathy if you'd joined the fight.

I was literally in primary school when this policy change was agreed.

FunkyMonks · 05/02/2024 13:27

We are basically becoming like America work til you drop dead literally.

Sad situation because inevitably younger lot will struggle to get the jobs or high paid salaries because coffin dodgers are being forced to continue to work.

DancefloorAcrobatics · 05/02/2024 13:28

Our economics teacher back in the early 90's told us that most of our generation will not retire...

I also think it's got to do with the UK wages being kept artificially low. The larger the available workforce, the more choice for the employers and lower hourly rates. Win win for them.

SinisterBumFacedCat · 05/02/2024 13:28

Both my parents are in their 60’s and already in care homes. I know that is not necessarily usual but it happens, early onset dementia is a thing. So I doubt I will even make it to retirement age. Even if I do, who honestly wants to employ 71 year old me over younger applicants? There’s going to be a lot of older people on benefits. People managing chronic conditions/pain who had a realistic target to aim for at 67 are just going to think fuck it if the goal posts keep getting moved.

makeanddo · 05/02/2024 13:29

Surely this is partly because of the current benefits bill, the amount of people who never have a private pension, their own house etc plus the massive increase in those with mental health issues that may never work a full time job.

Anyone who only has the basic gets pension credit - there a lot of additional benefits/payouts here. The government will be looking to reduce the benefits bill and get those that can work longer work, work harder and pay more tax.

They really can't keep squeezing people like this.

Swipe left for the next trending thread