Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Retirement for those born after 1970 is likely to rise to 71 in the future

436 replies

Tiddlywinkly · 05/02/2024 12:36

This Guardian article was a tad depressing to read:https://amp.theguardian.com/money/2024/feb/05/uk-state-pension-age-will-soon-need-to-rise-to-71-say-experts

I fully acknowledge that we are living longer, are having less children etc, but for many, our health might not be up to working for that long. There'll also be a knock on effect as to how much we'll be available for helping with grandkids/ very elderly parents.

I just wondered what other people thought?

UK state pension age will soon need to rise to 71, say experts | Retirement age | The Guardian

Research on life expectancy and birth rates shows that ill health makes status quo unsustainable

https://amp.theguardian.com/money/2024/feb/05/uk-state-pension-age-will-soon-need-to-rise-to-71-say-experts

OP posts:
pavillion1 · 05/02/2024 14:14

Im a carer , il never be able to afford to retire . It will get to the stage where im providing care for people younger than myself. Hopefully i wont live that long .

MrsTingly · 05/02/2024 14:15

Floralnomad · 05/02/2024 13:06

You can retire at whatever age you like if you are happy to fund it yourself , if the country cannot afford to fund it at lower than 71 then there is not much that they can do . I’d rather it was properly funded at an older age than poorly funded from a lower age .

You can usually only access a private pension 10y before state pension age.

Abra1t · 05/02/2024 14:17

I could have taken mine at 55. Will get state pension at 67.

Abra1t · 05/02/2024 14:19

Abra1t · 05/02/2024 14:17

I could have taken mine at 55. Will get state pension at 67.

Though I see this will change from 2028, to 57.

Chewbecca · 05/02/2024 14:25

IF anything like this were to happen, IMO, if would have to be in conjunction with higher mandatory private pension contributions (employer and employee) and removing opt out options. People will have to start saving for a private pension from the day they start work and continue to throughout working life. Just see it as extra tax, money you never had available to spend (like student loan repayments for example). It's much easier if it starts that way.
Hopefully then most people would be able to reduce outgoings (paying off mortgage, dependents leaving) and have sufficient pension savings to fund the gap / go part time until SP kicks in.

I would be massively against any means testing of SP, we have contributed (a lot) our entire working lives, taken promised SP into account in our financial plans. Agree with a PP, 'they' can fuck right off with any suggestion that the biggest contributors get no SP.

Acatdance · 05/02/2024 14:27

The line that we are living longer is often trotted out - this may be soo at the moment but indications are it's a trend that might soon reverse.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-68203749

marshmallowfinder · 05/02/2024 14:37

Tontostitis · 05/02/2024 12:46

Should of helped us fight it more then. I've had 7 years added to my working life despite starting work in a time of no maternity leave and a lifetime of lower pay. I had around ten years to save for the extra 7. Once they robbed us they start robbing you ce la vie, I'd have more sympathy if you'd joined the fight.

Should have, not should of.

stormy4319trevor · 05/02/2024 14:42

I think a new job could be invented - something like life advisor or elder. Anyone over 70 could pass on their wisdom to younger people. A job that could be done comfortably in a chair. I know people dismiss the idea that older people can teach us anything, but I think we're missing out by not listening to them. But if the idea is to employ 70 year olds as cleaners or carers, that's obviously ridiculous.

FlatWhiteExtraHot · 05/02/2024 14:43

jarpotato · 05/02/2024 12:56

So the government would need a plan for all the people who work but can't do the same physical level that job has at that age - what happens then?

They can all get a WFH job like disabled people are going to have to.

Where all these thousands of WFH jobs are going to come from I’m not quite sure!

XenoBitch · 05/02/2024 14:43

Commit a crime and go to prison. Might be my only realistic option by the time I am 71.

stormy4319trevor · 05/02/2024 14:46

Actually, I'd call the job mentor. People could advise on their area of expertise, though I think it should be part time and topped up via means testing.

Bridgetoo · 05/02/2024 14:48

@Goblinmodeactivated It seems that the big issue is the dramatic reduction in the work force as a result of preventable ill health

This is such a good point. I think the next government needs to look at improving public health as a national priority.

RhubarbGingerJam · 05/02/2024 14:49

XenoBitch · 05/02/2024 14:43

Commit a crime and go to prison. Might be my only realistic option by the time I am 71.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-47033704

That seems to have actually happened in Japan.

Japanese prisoner looking through bars

Why some Japanese pensioners want to go to jail

Japan is in the grip of an elderly crime wave. Poverty and loneliness are two of the possible causes.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/stories-47033704

Hijinks75 · 05/02/2024 14:50

for those who can, saving enough into a good pension scheme or putting savings elsewhere can help to retire earlier, problem is, in the public sector at least, retirement age now mirrors the age at which the state pension can be accessed, I couldn’t imagine being a nurse/ paramedic/ firefighter etc at that age, nor for that matter many jobs in the private sector, feel so sorry for those born post 70s, essentially work till you die

Acatdance · 05/02/2024 14:50

marshmallowfinder · 05/02/2024 14:37

Should have, not should of.

Pedants' Corner is that way âž¡

CactusMactus · 05/02/2024 14:50

I don't want to work past 45!!! (I'm 44 and really bored).

Sunnnybunny72 · 05/02/2024 14:51

fonfusedm · 05/02/2024 13:22

No one can say that a pensioner with an income over £60k "needs" the state pension!

But they paid their stamp! You will get flamed for the above

Many didn't.
MIL now 83, gave up work at 25 to raise two DC and never worked again. FIL is into his 30th year of retirement, doing very nicely financially thankyou, funds boosted by the non means tested benefits they receive and won't spend banking over £400 a month attendance allowance for example.

Puddingpieplum · 05/02/2024 14:55

It's making me seriously reconsider paying in to a pension that I may not get the benefit of as it's linked to state retirement age. I'd rather self invest and draw down as I see fit, rather than when the government tell me I can.

marshmallowfinder · 05/02/2024 14:58

Acatdance · 05/02/2024 14:50

Pedants' Corner is that way âž¡

There's nothing pedantic about pointing that out, and Pedants' Corner won't be visited by people who need to learn it. It's becoming extremely tiresome to keep seeing 'should of', would of', etc. I wasn't meaning to be rude, but was simply hopeful that a few people who use such abominations might instead consider choosing the correct word!

MercanDede · 05/02/2024 14:58

PutMyFootIn · 05/02/2024 13:02

I agree with this. Where were you all when us 50/60 somethings with no maternity leave, low pay, and hardley any warning were pushed from 60 to 67?

Although I wouldn't have been brave enough to actually say it 😀

I am one of the 50/60 somethings who had zero maternity pay, etc.
I did not fight the change in the 1990s because it was unfair for women to retire at 60 and men at 65, especially when women live longer than men. It also isn’t in keeping with equal rights for men and women. I wish they had lowered men to 60, but they did not. Still the principle of same pension age for both sexes was correct.

The increase from 65-67 is more like this current potential increase. It is being mooted because tax revenues are not enough to pay for everyone. So the options are increase the pension age or increase tax revenues.

I think NIC taxes on businesses should go up to fund it. Businesses benefit from workers and should therefore do more to support knackered, old workers have a retirement.

FlatWhiteExtraHot · 05/02/2024 15:00

Titwillow55 · 05/02/2024 13:52

When the old age pension was first introduced it was set as HIGHER than the average life expectancy. It was never meant to fund 30 years of retirement, sitting watching Eastenders, going on cruises, and having nice chit chats at knitting groups. The reality is if people want to have a period of time not earning their own keep at the end of their lives then they need to spend some time saving.

Most people are vastly underprepared financially for retirement and there is this idea that the government owes them a long fully funded old age. Everyone has to take responsibility for themselves. If you want 20-30 years not working then save and fund it yourself!

How are you supposed to financially prepare for retirement when you work a minimum wage job and spend 60% of your wages on housing costs and the rest on the ever increasing cost of food and bills?

Acatdance · 05/02/2024 15:00

marshmallowfinder · 05/02/2024 14:58

There's nothing pedantic about pointing that out, and Pedants' Corner won't be visited by people who need to learn it. It's becoming extremely tiresome to keep seeing 'should of', would of', etc. I wasn't meaning to be rude, but was simply hopeful that a few people who use such abominations might instead consider choosing the correct word!

It isn't really fair to police spelling and grammar on random threads, though. You have no idea what a particular poster's circumstances are.

user146990847100 · 05/02/2024 15:05

Puddingpieplum · 05/02/2024 14:55

It's making me seriously reconsider paying in to a pension that I may not get the benefit of as it's linked to state retirement age. I'd rather self invest and draw down as I see fit, rather than when the government tell me I can.

Agree.
Self employed and only contribute enough to our pensions to be tax efficient contributions.
I’d rather have money where i can get at it!

MercanDede · 05/02/2024 15:06

fonfusedm · 05/02/2024 13:56

Will it not be the case that all developed countries are competing for immigrants from the less developed ones? And as those countries develop they will also be subject to the same shifts i.e falling birth rates.
I don't think any other countries have succeeded in incentivising people to have more children

You're right we will be competing with other countries for immigrants as demographics are hitting much of the west. Are we attractive enough? Birth rates would improve somewhat with more support but I think the ship has sailed. We already have more over 65 yr olds than under 15 yr olds which is pretty scary.

Or exporting our pensioners to low cost of living countries with lots of young people.

MercanDede · 05/02/2024 15:09

EmpressoftheMundane · 05/02/2024 14:12

I think the question has to be, how does she state pension compare to UC, disability benefits etc. Because many people in their late 60s will be unable to work, or find it difficult to find work.

So, they will be getting working age benefits rather than state pension which might be more costly.

Well, for 18months they will if the new benefit reform goes through. After that it is mandatory work placement or starve in a gutter. Although no clue as to where the government will magic up these mandatory work placements from.

Swipe left for the next trending thread