Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

How do you think people would react if we were being nuked?

242 replies

sheetsoflux · 27/01/2024 13:42

I would predictably be in a corner scared senseless, to anyone including my DC

I would be googling ways to easily and quickly end my life instead of being fried to death by fire or a building collapsing on me

What do you think you would do? How do you think the public would react if we got told 'a nuclear bomb is heading our way, this is goodbye'. Not even sure who would be manning these radio stations etc to even talk about it so it would be eerie and strange as no radio outlet

I ask because I stumbled across Jim Carey's book and he said in an interview with Graham Norton that was a screenshot of his face when his sister, I think, told him a bomb was coming in Hawaii and this was it.

He said he felt strangely calm. People on Reddit who claim to have been there when they got the warning say all different things

Surprisingly there isn't a collective answer which sort of surprises me. I thought human nature would largely act similarly

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
IClaudine · 27/01/2024 17:07

Pliskin1 · 27/01/2024 16:51

how can a population have democracy, have a main stream media 24/7 that covers a lot more reach and influence, yet on mumsnet however its omg how dare people discuss topics like nuclear war ?

No one is saying these things can't be discussed. It is about the motivations of the poster. I suggest you do an AS on the OP. It is enlightening.

SunnieShine · 27/01/2024 17:09

Shiningout · 27/01/2024 15:12

Horrible thought. I'd probably slip my little one a load of sleeping medication and then myself and just hope we are passed out.

@Shiningout Good thinking, but do you actually have a load of sleeping pills?

I don't but wish I did.

Flapjacker48 · 27/01/2024 17:10

@GintyMcGinty There is no mechanism for warning the general public (was all dismantled post 1991) - unless you believe the Government's text message thing would be used and more importantly would work - unlikely from last year's test!

The 15 to 30 minutes or so notice the UK would get of an incoming strategic nuclear attack would mainly be used to get our own missiles away before the ability to do so was destroyed.

bringsomewood · 27/01/2024 17:14

bringsomewood · 27/01/2024 17:03

Better than none, like the UK.

Our nearest shelter is two houses away. I don’t know anyone who hasn’t looked up where their nearest are. There are about one on every road where I live. Might help, might not. But at least there is a plan.

Edited

To add, we also have warning sirens that are used in acute danger and reaches most of our population. They do sound tests every three months.

LauderSyme · 27/01/2024 17:18

@bringsomewood Please elucidate why you think I am being incredibly naive?

I assure you that your explanation won't be lost on me.

bringsomewood · 27/01/2024 17:22

@LauderSyme basically what @IClaudine said. It is about the motivations of the poster. And other similar posters today.

IClaudine · 27/01/2024 17:26

@LauderSyme there are elections coming up here in the UK and in the US. There will be more manipulation on SM than normal, involving all sorts of players with varying agendas.

sheetsoflux · 27/01/2024 17:28

IClaudine · 27/01/2024 17:26

@LauderSyme there are elections coming up here in the UK and in the US. There will be more manipulation on SM than normal, involving all sorts of players with varying agendas.

This current player is sitting in a dressing gown waiting for her Papa John's to arrive

I am not a spy. I am not 'a player in the game'

I am a mildly bored parent carer sat on the sofa browsing Mumsnet!

OP posts:
MixedCouple · 27/01/2024 17:29

Maybe speak to the Japanese they had to go through it twice.

Rycbar · 27/01/2024 17:30

sheetsoflux · 27/01/2024 14:17

But there wasn't nukes in those wars

…. Yes there were….

sheetsoflux · 27/01/2024 17:31

@Rycbar in Japan. The poster was speaking about 'well in WW1 and 2...' and it was based on Europe in that context of her reply

Different to Japan, obviously

OP posts:
IClaudine · 27/01/2024 17:35

sheetsoflux · 27/01/2024 17:28

This current player is sitting in a dressing gown waiting for her Papa John's to arrive

I am not a spy. I am not 'a player in the game'

I am a mildly bored parent carer sat on the sofa browsing Mumsnet!

I didn't say you were any of those things. I certainly didn't say you were a spy 🤣

ToBeOrNotToBee · 27/01/2024 17:44

sheetsoflux · 27/01/2024 17:31

@Rycbar in Japan. The poster was speaking about 'well in WW1 and 2...' and it was based on Europe in that context of her reply

Different to Japan, obviously

Didn't know that we were restricting the events of a WORLD War to just Europe

sheetsoflux · 27/01/2024 17:46

@ToBeOrNotToBee no, but there was an assumption in this case - which was me assuming that particular poster that you took that response from was either European or American. A fair assumption, I'd say

OP posts:
ToBeOrNotToBee · 27/01/2024 17:48

American bombed Japan with the technology advancements of international (including British) scientists.

JessicasLavalier · 27/01/2024 17:52

How do you think the public would react if we got told 'a nuclear bomb is heading our way, this is goodbye'

If this was the case (and it was incomming armeggendon) we wouldn't be told. What's the point? It would cause mass panic. Those politicians with access to a bunker would be off, the rest of us would die.

It's like at the airport when they know the flight is going to be delayed by 5 hours, they don't tell you that because there would be a riot. It gets doled out in 30 min delays.

stormy4319trevor · 27/01/2024 17:53

If there's any chance of being put in stasis for 2000 years, while orbiting the planet in space, I'll take that option please.

AgnesX · 27/01/2024 17:55

I think I'd prefer not to know. I reckon that 4 minute warning would seem a long time despite being no time at all ( is a 4 minute warning a real thing or is that just a fallacy?)

IClaudine · 27/01/2024 17:56

sheetsoflux · 27/01/2024 17:46

@ToBeOrNotToBee no, but there was an assumption in this case - which was me assuming that particular poster that you took that response from was either European or American. A fair assumption, I'd say

This is such an odd thing to say. The bombing of Japan by the US was a pivotal event which had repercussions for the entire world.

sheetsoflux · 27/01/2024 18:03

ToBeOrNotToBee · 27/01/2024 17:48

American bombed Japan with the technology advancements of international (including British) scientists.

Indeed. But we didn't have the devastating fallout that they did because of it, did we?

The poster was talking about the hardships relating to war on the ground and air/naval since that's where it hurt us the most in those wars, obviously

OP posts:
Validus · 27/01/2024 18:03

Am I in the immediate blast zone? If so, I’d put my headphones in and listen to something nice. If I’m with my family I’d put the kids favourite movie on and just not tell them.

if in the ‘fire’ zone - I’d look to get usunderground and if alive after look to move towards safety. Probably take iodine tablets if I can find them in the cupboard.

if outside - check my supplies and stock up on seeds and any outstanding items I might need. Explain to the kids they need to stay indoors and follow orders.

Validus · 27/01/2024 18:05

sheetsoflux · 27/01/2024 18:03

Indeed. But we didn't have the devastating fallout that they did because of it, did we?

The poster was talking about the hardships relating to war on the ground and air/naval since that's where it hurt us the most in those wars, obviously

The fallout from the more modern bombs isn’t as bad apparently. If you survive the blast you’ve a middling to decent chance.

LadyVampMgs · 27/01/2024 18:08

bringsomewood · 27/01/2024 16:57

Yeah I’ve read back now. It’s actually dangerous to be this naive.

I posted this on another thread, it’s a brochure sent out to the population of Sweden. Easy to read.

https://rib.msb.se/filer/pdf/30307.pdf

Be on the lookout for false
information

States and organisations are already using misleading information in order to try and influence our values and how we act. The aim may be to reduce our resilience and willingness to defend ourselves.

The best protection against false information and hostile
propaganda is to critically appraise the source:
• Is this factual information or opinion?
• What is the aim of this information?
• Who has put this out?
• Is the source trustworthy?
• Is this information available somewhere else?
• Is this information new or old and why is it out there at this precise moment?
• Search for information – the best way to counteract propaganda and false information is to have done
your homework.
• Do not believe in rumours – use more than one reliable source in order to see whether the information is
correct.
• Do not spread rumours – if the information does not appear trustworthy, do not pass it on.

Edited

so basically when our main stream media was covering various Wmd's how exactly should a population trust offical sources as when we did Wmd scandal happened ?

Flapjacker48 · 27/01/2024 18:08

@Validus It's not really the age of the bomb per se, it depending on if the nuclear weapon was used in ground burst (much more fallout), air burst (less fall out) or as an EMP weapon (little fall out)