I saw Saltburn last night and really enjoyed some of the well-written and subtle nuances conveyed around the behaviours and habits of the upper classes especially concerning inclusion/exclusion of others and the rules of engaging in those circles.
I think the story Saltburn tells is quite a common experience for many university-educated people albeit to a lesser or greater extent (being clever and socially mobile enough to be educated alongside the privileged, and to see their world, but not rich, connected, unstable or old money enough to be entirely let in.)
What I find unfortunate in stories like this (The Talented Mr Ripley et al) is that the writer feels the story is not compelling enough without making the "working class" character into a psychopathic con man who kills everyone at the end.
The real complexity of being a "working to middle class" person given a peek/included in an "upper class/old money" world, is that you are generally quite grounded and psychologically stable compared to those you are surrounded by. It's the struggle of being true to yourself in these scenarios which is the story I wish someone would tell.
Does anyone feel the same?
(I put class references in inverted commas as I believe everybody defines class differently and don't want to be prescriptive or presume I see class in the way that you do)