Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

If you're worried about rising private school fees..

545 replies

CurlewKate · 28/09/2023 13:35

... why not just get a better paid job? It apparently works for poor people.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Graciebobcat · 28/09/2023 15:49

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 28/09/2023 15:45

So that's an argument for better funding for those children - and one that I would fully support fwiw. It isn't an argument for maintaining the tax advantages for all private schools, many of which are catering to an entirely different demographic.

Appropriate SEN provision is a necessity, not a luxury. As such, it should be properly funded by the state, and parents should not have to fight for it. What happens to the poor kids whose parents don't have the skills or capacity to advocate on their behalf?

Private education for the majority of private school pupils is a luxury, not a necessity. They could attend state schools instead. As such, it is perfectly reasonable to tax the fees, as any other luxury is taxed.

I don't blame you at all for making that choice.

But ALL schools need to be smaller and kinder with small class sizes, as currently one in five kids are persistently absent.

BlurredEdges · 28/09/2023 15:50

Freepo · 28/09/2023 15:47

i don’t see how it’s going to be possible to create a “fairer society” without having regard to the money that pays for the state schools, the hospitals, social care and the countless other public services on which those less well off disproportionally rely.

Do you think that money will somehow disappear?

BlurredEdges · 28/09/2023 15:51

3WildOnes · 28/09/2023 15:46

Are you fucking serious? My child has no idea that his school fees are a stretch for us. My child has asd and anxiety. He was struggling in his state school but is thriving in a smaller more nurturing environment, no school avoidance. Many many families choose private schools because they have anxious and/or asd children who would struggle in large comprehensive schools. Families in my position who can't afford private usually resort to homeschooling which I will reluctantly do if I can no longer afford the fees.

So it's OK when you benefit from it, and those poorer than you lose out. But not when you are too poor to benefit from it, and those richer than you still benefit. Got it.

Btw, children notice much more than you think.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

SueVineer · 28/09/2023 15:52

BlurredEdges · 28/09/2023 15:44

Indeed - there are many, many families who have children with SEN who don't have thousands of pounds to spare every year. Perhaps a government which prioritised improving SEN care for all children, and not just those with rich parents, is something to aspire towards, rather than to complain about.

Of course - most families don’t. But why would you rub your hands with glee at making those who can stretch to get their sen kids a suitable education worse off or no longer able to afford suitable schooling?

and yes, of course it would be nice for every child in the state sector to have a choice of good schools but they don’t and that’s not happening any time soon.

Freepo · 28/09/2023 15:52

Private education for the majority of private school pupils is a luxury, not a necessity. They could attend state schools instead. As such, it is perfectly reasonable to tax the fees, as any other luxury is taxed

This luxury saves the tax payer a fuckton of money by parents paying for a service the state would otherwise have to provide.

Freepo · 28/09/2023 15:54

BlurredEdges · 28/09/2023 15:50

Do you think that money will somehow disappear?

  1. they’ll need more money to fund the additional state school spaces

  2. in my opinion, there is currently woeful underinvestment in many services to protect and assist our vulnerable. Being fiscally responsible is essential to reversing that. So I believe your comment of who cares about money maybe they just want to be fair is very naive

gotomomo · 28/09/2023 15:55

90% of kids are in the state system, a further % are in private schools funded by the state (sen schools usually) I don't think anyone can get that upset if a small number of the private school students have to switch to private what the rest of the country have no choice but use, scholarships or not. Perhaps a rolling out of vat by year group would prevent a cliff edge for those already in gcse and a level years but beyond that my sympathy is limited.

My dd, my eldest in particular struggled at her failing comp but I don't have rich parents to pay fees so there she stayed (we weren't wealthy enough to pay school fees and the mortgage!) she got 6 a* and 4 A's from her school in special measures, 3 heads in 2 years... pretty sure she wouldn't have done much better at private school.

The only reason kids at private schools do better is because they get educational support at home, enrichment, parents value education etc - you do that at comp they also get the grades they are capable of (not all kids are capable of A's/9's they are usually weeded out of private schools from friends experience)

SueVineer · 28/09/2023 15:55

BlurredEdges · 28/09/2023 15:51

So it's OK when you benefit from it, and those poorer than you lose out. But not when you are too poor to benefit from it, and those richer than you still benefit. Got it.

Btw, children notice much more than you think.

When does she say “it’s ok if those poorer than” her lose out? She says nothing of the sort. She is pointing out that the alternative to paying for private is home schooling- and no that’s not ok.

you’re so desperate to hit out at those you’re jealous of but instead you’re just attacking sen kids and their families.

Mrburnshound · 28/09/2023 15:56

FWIW lots of private sen schools allow parents to pay (i have experience of this). Often kids get it added to their EHCP further down the line, but it's very common ime to pay for nursery and reception. Although lots are also council funded from day 1, depends on how quickly the EHCP process goes.

I dont think any specialist SEN schools should be subject to the VAT, however it seems that they will be(?) I wonder if labour will spend all the extra money on many new state special schools (🤣🤣 not happening).

Graciebobcat · 28/09/2023 15:56

Freepo · 28/09/2023 15:52

Private education for the majority of private school pupils is a luxury, not a necessity. They could attend state schools instead. As such, it is perfectly reasonable to tax the fees, as any other luxury is taxed

This luxury saves the tax payer a fuckton of money by parents paying for a service the state would otherwise have to provide.

But if a load of vocal, private school parents were suddenly plunged into the state sector, a lot of fucking schools might be built PDQ.

Politicians mostly went to and send their kids to private schools or top performing state schools. The current lot certainly have no clue or don't care how state schools are failing so many pupils right now.

eveoha · 28/09/2023 15:57

Well let’s hope for all you ‘private’ school users that Labour leave private schools’ charitable status intact - pretty certain fees will rise when it is eventually removed - 👍🏿☘️

Fistralstorm · 28/09/2023 15:57

I guess they could take in some ironing and just eat massive salads

3WildOnes · 28/09/2023 15:58

BlurredEdges · 28/09/2023 15:51

So it's OK when you benefit from it, and those poorer than you lose out. But not when you are too poor to benefit from it, and those richer than you still benefit. Got it.

Btw, children notice much more than you think.

Where did I say that? I'm not the one trying to take it from anyone. If I can no longer afford private fees I will be sad for my family but I won't be trying to remove it from anyone else nor will I be bitter that they can afford it. It's not a race to the bottom. I will just be sad for my family.

twistyizzy · 28/09/2023 15:58

@eveoha they have u-turned on charitable status and are no longer removing it

Usernamehell · 28/09/2023 15:58

BlurredEdges · 28/09/2023 15:48

Perhaps parents who really aren't wealthy enough to buy educational privilege for their children should have considered that before placing their children there. It's on them if their children are 'destabilised'.

Not incidentally, thousands of children a year in state schools have to change schools because of living circumstances - divorce, separation, eviction, etc. Without a handy cushion of multiple thousands of pounds sloshing around to help ease the transition. But no one seems bothered about that.

Who said no-one is bothered about it?

It takes a truly disgusting person to pile on with comments like yours. Says more about you than any parent who pays thousands for their children's education

Heatherbell1978 · 28/09/2023 15:58

Ah the classic, if I can't afford it, no-one else should have it. We Brits love a race to the bottom.

yearofthebuttercup · 28/09/2023 15:59

3WildOnes · 28/09/2023 15:46

Are you fucking serious? My child has no idea that his school fees are a stretch for us. My child has asd and anxiety. He was struggling in his state school but is thriving in a smaller more nurturing environment, no school avoidance. Many many families choose private schools because they have anxious and/or asd children who would struggle in large comprehensive schools. Families in my position who can't afford private usually resort to homeschooling which I will reluctantly do if I can no longer afford the fees.

Do you think there aren't a lot of kids in state schools who are neurodiverse, who have disabilities, mental health issues, anxiety etc? State schools deserve the extra funding they desperately need.

ChocolateyBiccy · 28/09/2023 16:01

I'm amazed at how nasty some of these posts are. And short-sighted too.

Do people not get that once people are priced-out of private school education they will then move to the catchment areas of the better state schools, thereby preventing others from being able to attend the better state schools?

And where will this end: What about university fees, private nurseries, private tuition? And of course the private sector is heavily relied on by many with SEN who often aren't adequately catered for by the state system.

Freepo · 28/09/2023 16:02

But if a load of vocal, private school parents were suddenly plunged into the state sector, a lot of fucking schools might be built PDQ

yeah, that’s ridiculous. In the same way the labour government isn’t listening to them protesting about VAT, it isn’t going to listen to them about building schools.

the better off would just buy up the houses near the better state schools to get their kids in there

SueVineer · 28/09/2023 16:02

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 28/09/2023 15:45

So that's an argument for better funding for those children - and one that I would fully support fwiw. It isn't an argument for maintaining the tax advantages for all private schools, many of which are catering to an entirely different demographic.

Appropriate SEN provision is a necessity, not a luxury. As such, it should be properly funded by the state, and parents should not have to fight for it. What happens to the poor kids whose parents don't have the skills or capacity to advocate on their behalf?

Private education for the majority of private school pupils is a luxury, not a necessity. They could attend state schools instead. As such, it is perfectly reasonable to tax the fees, as any other luxury is taxed.

Of course children with sen should have better provision. But that won’t happen certainly not quickly. And yes, for many private school is a luxury for for some it’s a necessity.

The problem is that this policy will harm kids who need the smaller class sizes and extra assistance that private can offer. Yes it would be nice if we could all have that, but understandably parents already having to pay for their kids to get an adequate education because the state isn’t offering appropriate provision are not keen to pay even more.

SueVineer · 28/09/2023 16:04

yearofthebuttercup · 28/09/2023 15:59

Do you think there aren't a lot of kids in state schools who are neurodiverse, who have disabilities, mental health issues, anxiety etc? State schools deserve the extra funding they desperately need.

Do you really think it’s ok for you to lecture mothers of sen kids on SEN education?

CurlewKate · 28/09/2023 16:05

It's also important to remember that the best indicators of success in education is the education levels and involvement of the parents. So by definition, most private school children will do wherever they go

OP posts:
ChocolateyBiccy · 28/09/2023 16:05

But do you honestly think they will get the extra funding? I don't. The money will just disappear into a black hole and, very sadly, I don't see SEN getting the priority it deserves.

If anything, resources for SEN will become worse as they will have to be stretched to provide for those who can no longer afford private schooling.

SkinnyMalinkyLankyLegs · 28/09/2023 16:06

BlurredEdges · 28/09/2023 15:45

Anyone who has thousands of pounds a year to spare on something which is available for free is rich. HTH.

Single parent here, band 7 nurse. Child already at the nursery attached to the private school which she will be going to in a couple of years. Definitely not rich. HTH.

Usernamehell · 28/09/2023 16:09

CurlewKate · 28/09/2023 16:05

It's also important to remember that the best indicators of success in education is the education levels and involvement of the parents. So by definition, most private school children will do wherever they go

Do you think that justifies starting this nasty thread?

Swipe left for the next trending thread