"As the Judge says, the monster showed no remorse." If she was innocent she wouldn't show remorse for something she hadn't done.
I don't know if she was guilty or not, but felt uncomfortable about the verdict and the lack of any real evidence. Some of her nurse colleagues think she's innocent.
I'm a former nurse and certain things made me think. Babies do have projectile vomit sometimes - it's quite common. Even more so in neonates. Dr Evans theory that this baby had been forcefed milk was an assumption based on the fact the baby still had 40mls of milk aspirated after the projectile vomit and was only supposed to have 40mls of milk. There were gaps in that theory - what if a nurse had re-fed the baby 40mls after the projectile vomit to ensure it had milk?
I listened to a podcast where Dr Evans was being interviewed by a psychiatrist (Raj Persaud) and when he was asked questions about the air embolus theory he struggled to answer them and changed the subject. From what he said, air embolus was only seen on the x rays of two babies (who had had post mortems and it had been seen as a normal thing on a post mortem). And from what he said (or avoided saying) it was more or less guessing that the others had air embolus, because they had a bluey coloured rash.
Sepsis also causes that kind of rash and air embolus apparently. As well as projectile vomiting, swollen stomach etc and multiple other organ failures and symptoms, plus bleeding. Some of the babies had actually been diagnosed with sepsis.
As I say I don't know if she is guilty or not but some things seemed to have been made to fit the picture of murder as opposed to natural deaths. 6 of the 7 babies that died had had post mortems and been considered to die of natural causes.
From what I saw, they didn't really have a case against her until the insulin aspect - but there was no proof that the babies had actually been injected with any insulin - the drip bags weren't tested and nobody saw anything. The Mother of one of the babies was diabetic and on insulin............I don't know enough about it but there are various reports that there are other causes of high insulin being found without it being injected (sepsis being one of them). The plumber said he was called in weekly over the waste water issue.
It all sounded a bit flimsy to me - particularly as the deaths were only in the summers of 2015 and 2016. If she was a serial killer, why only do it in summer?
If there were issues with waste water and nurses were washing their hands from the taps they could have been transferring pathogens to the babies.
The prosecution case was all based on Dr Evans findings and the note. The note is another topic but I do think it sounded like someone in distress at what she was being accused of and bits were taken out of context.
However, as mentioned earlier in this thread, when someone mentioned people who had been in court and thought she was guilty by her behaviour and the way she responded. That is hard to imagine. And I am not sure how I would behave after being in prison for two years waiting for a trial. Maybe she was angry at the accusations. The prosecution's job is to make her angry and lose her cool under cross examination - it's how they win cases. I'm not sure what she was supposed to be found lying about other than being in a tracksuit rather than pyjamas but that sounds a bit flimsy too. She was arrested three times - and had been in prison two years - hardly something you'd remember clearly what you were wearing on each occasion.
If she gets an appeal maybe more will come out. But if the verdict was incorrect, those poor parents have to get their heads round another set of circumstances and someone else to blame.