Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

If you could change it would you have your kids younger or older than the age you actually were?

152 replies

atolly · 18/07/2023 18:22

What age were you, and would you change it? Just being nosey!

OP posts:
WimpoleHat · 18/07/2023 19:05

33 and 35. I think I’d have waited a couple of years if I could’ve been certain of my fertility. (Which, of course, you can’t be….)

LittleMonks11 · 18/07/2023 19:06

Flev · 18/07/2023 18:42

I had my daughter at 40, ideally I'd have preferred to be about 5-10 years younger but I hadn't met my husband at that stage.

Me three

Threesmycrowd · 18/07/2023 19:06

34 and 36. Wish I'd started 5 years earlier. As pp said, hadn't met dh then though.

Rocknrollstar · 18/07/2023 19:06

22 and 25. Sounds ridiculously young now. We’d already been together four years and had a mortgage and a car. It seemed the right time. Once they were at school I went to uni and built a good career in education. Managed to do a lot of travel too. And we are young enough to be active with our GC and take them out.

noglow · 18/07/2023 19:07

In an ideal world a little bit younger. But it wasn't an ideal world so I'm happy.he

FreyafromLondon · 18/07/2023 19:07

19 my first I wish I'd had him later my second I was 32 I wish I'd had her earlier

jammydodgier · 18/07/2023 19:08

29 and 32 - Im nearly 33 now. I feel like that was perfect for us!
DH is the same age as me (we went to school together)

Snowonthebeachx · 18/07/2023 19:09

33 (starting trying at 31) and now trying for number 2 at 35 and will be 36 at least for the next one. A bit earlier would have been good as then I wouldn't be stressing about my age now! But I had a fun 20s. Lots of my friends haven't even started yet! And I was the youngest in my nct.

Sadilicious · 18/07/2023 19:10

I was thirty-nine, but met DH and got married quite late too. In an ideal situation i would have done everything ten years earlier and had another child, poor DD would love a sibling.

DramaAlpaca · 18/07/2023 19:13

I was 29, 30 and 33. That was perfect for me.

notsurewherenotsurewhy · 18/07/2023 19:15

25 then 30. Wouldn't have changed a thing.

Tulips2507 · 18/07/2023 19:15

34 and wish I had mine a few years earlier so I had more time to decide if I wanted a second or to have the option of a bigger age gap.

Zezet · 18/07/2023 19:16

26-32, was perfect for me, though I regret this was at least 10 years earlier than my peers, and in that sense it was very lonely.

BertieBotts · 18/07/2023 19:16

I think no overall because I like the age gap that we have and I wouldn't have wanted to finish having DC any later.

But I was definitely too young with DS1 at 20, so I should have had him later really. I had the other two at 30 and 33 and those were good ages.

heartofglass23 · 18/07/2023 19:19

Biologically it's so much better to have them young.

It's sad that society makes it so hard to be a young mum.

mamatoTails · 18/07/2023 19:19

Pregnant with my first at 21, had him at 22. Then four more before I was 31.

Wouldn't change it as wanted to have them all fairly young.

GreeboIsMySpiritAnimal · 18/07/2023 19:20

Younger - I started trying to get pregnant at 30, but it took till I was 33 to have my first. Had my second at 35, then wanted a third at 37, but DH (three years older) felt too old.

If I'd been successful in conceiving at 30, then had my second at 33, then I might've been able to persuade DH to go for no.3 at 35.

I wouldn't give up my child free, carefree 20s for anything though!

OldTinHat · 18/07/2023 19:24

MC at 24. Divorced and then remarried, DC at 27 and 28.

Wouldn't change anything.

JustToBeMe · 18/07/2023 19:25

32 and 35
When I think back, I think I would have been slightly young 26/27 maybe?

However it didn't work out that way, que sera sera...

stargirl1701 · 18/07/2023 19:27

36 and 38. I think a decade earlier would've helped.

Shouldhavebutdidnt · 18/07/2023 19:28

43

would have been earlier but took 11 years to carry a baby to term

wish it had been much earlier as I’m knackered and they are still small, and an only

friends kids are adults and I’m worrying about primary school friendships

also been with DH since 21 which confuses people

Isthisreallyok · 18/07/2023 19:29

Had mine at 32 and 36. Wouldn’t change it at all I think, for me, it was the perfect age. Got all the drinking/partying/festivals/travelling out of my system in my 20’s and also financially secure when we had them. Hopefully when they’ve left home/are independent I’ll still be young enough to enjoy more ‘me time’ and more travelling! Only thing I regret is I had 2 miscarriages between the first and second and ideally would have started trying earlier…but only by a few months and can’t say that other things wouldn’t have gone wrong 🤷‍♀️.

Whataretheodds · 18/07/2023 19:32

I'm 42 with fingers crossed that this one goes to term. Only been together 3 years and first pregnancy was last year.

Would have loved to have had my first at least 2-3 years ago so that a 2nd seemed feasible but as things stand I'll be delighted to have 1 healthy child.

If I'd met the right guy 10- 12 years ago then I'd probably have wanted to start trying for the first by 35 or, if earlier and £ allowed, to freeze some embryos.

Whataretheodds · 18/07/2023 19:33

heartofglass23 · 18/07/2023 19:19

Biologically it's so much better to have them young.

It's sad that society makes it so hard to be a young mum.

That and so many men being idiots!

Mariposista · 18/07/2023 19:33

Flev · 18/07/2023 18:42

I had my daughter at 40, ideally I'd have preferred to be about 5-10 years younger but I hadn't met my husband at that stage.

I am 32 and LTR ended. You give me hope.