Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

There we go Schofield has admitted ‘affair’

1000 replies

muppetmayhem · 26/05/2023 18:34

Front page of the daily mail for my sins.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
42
Romeiswheretheheartis · 28/05/2023 10:31

I think calling any of these liaisons 'relationships' is misleading. I would bet the reality of the 'on-off relationship' was PS using the young man for sex as and when he felt like it. MM wont have had any say in when it was on or off - he may have thought he was in a relationship, but I'm pretty sure PS won't have seen it that way. He's calling it that now to try to disguise the unpalatable truth.

SquirrelSoShiny · 28/05/2023 10:46

I'll be really interested to see what comes out about DW and indeed the executives protecting 'the talent'.

FrenchLilacs · 28/05/2023 11:06

curiousitykilledthecake · 28/05/2023 09:49

Wondering.. if Philip Schofield is being cancelled like this for grooming a child why was Cheryl Cole not considering she met Liam Payne when he was 14 and she was his mentor and then they went on to have a baby and a relationship? Both parties met the other as a child and once legal had relationships with them. I find both creepy but it seems one is more accepted?

Because there wasn’t a HUGE age difference.

FrenchLilacs · 28/05/2023 11:07

And she wasn’t shagging him in secret and making him promise not to tell anyone, whilst she was married with kids and selling herself on having a wholesome image…

KatyKopykat · 28/05/2023 11:09

Romeiswheretheheartis · 28/05/2023 10:31

I think calling any of these liaisons 'relationships' is misleading. I would bet the reality of the 'on-off relationship' was PS using the young man for sex as and when he felt like it. MM wont have had any say in when it was on or off - he may have thought he was in a relationship, but I'm pretty sure PS won't have seen it that way. He's calling it that now to try to disguise the unpalatable truth.

100%. I was in a similar situation at 18 with a 30 year old radio presenter. Grateful for attention and thinking he was my boyfriend and being happy after six months with no arguments. Six months of, with the exception of the first and only date, him turning up at my student accommodation unannounced and me doing what he wanted and being grateful.

Lampzade · 28/05/2023 11:21

Romeiswheretheheartis · 28/05/2023 10:31

I think calling any of these liaisons 'relationships' is misleading. I would bet the reality of the 'on-off relationship' was PS using the young man for sex as and when he felt like it. MM wont have had any say in when it was on or off - he may have thought he was in a relationship, but I'm pretty sure PS won't have seen it that way. He's calling it that now to try to disguise the unpalatable truth.

Agree

WimbyAce · 28/05/2023 11:24

Romeiswheretheheartis · 28/05/2023 10:31

I think calling any of these liaisons 'relationships' is misleading. I would bet the reality of the 'on-off relationship' was PS using the young man for sex as and when he felt like it. MM wont have had any say in when it was on or off - he may have thought he was in a relationship, but I'm pretty sure PS won't have seen it that way. He's calling it that now to try to disguise the unpalatable truth.

Yes this is what I think. Apparently young lad publicly announced his love for Phil 2 years ago at an awards bash. I guess he thought they could be public once Phil was out. Guessing Phil shut this down and silenced him threatening him with his ITV career. Hence the denials to ITV. Now that Phil holds no power with ITV the lad is fully in clear to be honest as Phil no longer has a hold over him. I wonder if we will hear his story soon. Just curious as to what has happened this year for this all to kick off and not 2 years ago?

Lampzade · 28/05/2023 11:24

RedToothBrush · 28/05/2023 10:04

It's not a great look for Cheryl.

However she's not lied, nor thrown her weight around resulting in the ill treatment of others at the expense of their careers (multiple people). She's not lawyered up to block media stories from reporting the truth. She's not lawyered up to (attempt to fraudulently) argue about reputation damage in order to get contractual obligations met. Nor done a huge thing about how stunning and brave they are for coming out (which might just have been a damage limitation exercise in itself in order to cover up a relationship). Nor has she under oath admitted to knowing her brother was a paedo but only wetly said 'dont do it again' rather than report it (remembering he didn't condemn his brother until AFTER the verdict was given).

There's lots of other problems with Schofield's actions. It's not JUST the relationship itself. It's how he's dealt with it subsequently.

It's about multiple abuses of power. Not just potential grooming.

This 💯

RedToothBrush · 28/05/2023 11:24

KatyKopykat · 28/05/2023 11:09

100%. I was in a similar situation at 18 with a 30 year old radio presenter. Grateful for attention and thinking he was my boyfriend and being happy after six months with no arguments. Six months of, with the exception of the first and only date, him turning up at my student accommodation unannounced and me doing what he wanted and being grateful.

I know someone who had a relationship over a number of years with someone in a band. He was married. She got pregnant. He wasn't happy. HUGE age difference. First met when she was in mid teens. The power imbalance was definitely a big thing in that relationship. She came out of it a complete mess. It's not pretty and definitely not ok.

SamW98 · 28/05/2023 11:27

Romeiswheretheheartis · 28/05/2023 10:31

I think calling any of these liaisons 'relationships' is misleading. I would bet the reality of the 'on-off relationship' was PS using the young man for sex as and when he felt like it. MM wont have had any say in when it was on or off - he may have thought he was in a relationship, but I'm pretty sure PS won't have seen it that way. He's calling it that now to try to disguise the unpalatable truth.

💯 agree.

anon666 · 28/05/2023 11:31

I've had enough of him to be honest. It sounds like he's actually a bit of a predator. I think ITV should cut the cord although they should have done it years ago before Eamonn and Ruth walked.

RhinoMoveFast · 28/05/2023 11:46

I think M M is best to try build a good life now. Jill Duggar didn't find sharing her story long term helpful.

There is enough now to try improve things, although it never does get better, we should not stop striving.

Roxy69 · 28/05/2023 12:20

ODFOx · 26/05/2023 18:47

He had an affair with another consenting adult. FGS the 'mystery' and conjecture has made it far worse than it ever was.
If he'd come clean about the affair when he came out it would be water under the bridge by now.

Quite! And why it's HW's buisness or anyone else outside his immediate family is beyond me.

Vitriolinsanity · 28/05/2023 12:21

Blimey, everyone associated with this tacky tale is running for the lifeboats.

dysongirl · 28/05/2023 12:23

A Liar and a cheat 😮
His poor wife and children having to cope with this😡
The Coward
How awkward did Dermot o leary look being made to announce it 😯

Merrymouse · 28/05/2023 12:35

curiousitykilledthecake · 28/05/2023 09:49

Wondering.. if Philip Schofield is being cancelled like this for grooming a child why was Cheryl Cole not considering she met Liam Payne when he was 14 and she was his mentor and then they went on to have a baby and a relationship? Both parties met the other as a child and once legal had relationships with them. I find both creepy but it seems one is more accepted?

Isn’t it obvious?

There is no implication that they had a romantic/sexual relationship until after the band had become famous in their own right, he was in his 20’s, the age gap is only 10 years and neither of them lied to their employers.

In contrast the runner was completely dependent on Schofield for his job, but forced to lie for years.

Merrymouse · 28/05/2023 12:36

Roxy69 · 28/05/2023 12:20

Quite! And why it's HW's buisness or anyone else outside his immediate family is beyond me.

It’s not 2002.

We now look at imbalances of power when we talk about consent.

billy1966 · 28/05/2023 12:38

SamW98 · 28/05/2023 11:27

💯 agree.

The whole business makes my skin crawl.

What must this poor young mans family must think, knowing their child was used by a man 40 YEARS his senior.

Skin crawling.

ITV are a sordid bunch.

I don't believe for a second people around him didn't know.

Utterly sordid.

Jimmy Savile and the BBC comes to mind, people knew well he was a creep, but never saw a thing.🙄

That whole coming out on TM with HW holding him looked so staged and false.

Again made my skin crawl.

The "legal but unwise" bit...this reeks of an absolutely predatory unbalanced foul entanglement.

Poor young man.

BonnyLassie99 · 28/05/2023 12:42

SamW98 · 28/05/2023 10:10

She also wasn’t in a long term marriage at the time she started her relationship with a younger man.

I think Cheryl’s is guilty of having very poor judgement when it comes to her personal life but she’s not a predator

Yes I agree and there are posts all over Tattle saying the same thing about Cheryl and it’s not the same at all, maybe if she had kept in touch with Liam from when he was 14 to the time she got into a relationship with him, but she didn’t.

There was also a post on there that said Cheryl was openly flirting with Liam on XFactor when he was 14 & that’s total lies!!

WhisperingAutistic · 28/05/2023 12:47

Looks like the Mirror are wanting to run a story on PS contacting boys on twitter.

There we go Schofield has admitted ‘affair’
There we go Schofield has admitted ‘affair’
SallyWD · 28/05/2023 12:54

So he met MM when he was 15 but they didn't start a relationship until he was 18? The thing I dislike most is the fact PS was a MUCH older man. A very famous man who was in a position of great power at TM. It's very unpleasant to think of a man that age in a sexual relationship with a teenager, especially when the man has that position of power. However, legally MM was a consenting adult. Morally it's really not good.
As for the grooming stuff I really haven't seen any evidence of this. Seems like they had intermittent contact after meeting but I can't see how that counts as grooming. I feel that part of the story is conjecture - or has someone seen evidence of grooming. PS getting him a job on TM obviously a bit sus but again, not actually evidence of grooming.

Shitsandwiches · 28/05/2023 13:00

The nature of groomers is that it's not just the teenage boy victims he's grooming for sex, it's also everybody else plus all the TV viewers that are groomed to keep their reputations intact. That's why these so called 'witch hunts' happen when the curtain is finally yanked back and we see the real person behind the charade. HW is one as well - she's made a fortune pretending to be a nice person on screen when in reality she's a self-serving nasty piece of work.

They are sociopaths, they are definitely not the only ones on TV and it makes me angry that they feel nothing more than contempt for their public but desperately need our admiration for their bank balances.

HW absolutely knew that disgusting creep was using that young boy. She wouldn't have given a toss about it.

Aquarius1234 · 28/05/2023 13:22

Shitsandwiches · 28/05/2023 13:00

The nature of groomers is that it's not just the teenage boy victims he's grooming for sex, it's also everybody else plus all the TV viewers that are groomed to keep their reputations intact. That's why these so called 'witch hunts' happen when the curtain is finally yanked back and we see the real person behind the charade. HW is one as well - she's made a fortune pretending to be a nice person on screen when in reality she's a self-serving nasty piece of work.

They are sociopaths, they are definitely not the only ones on TV and it makes me angry that they feel nothing more than contempt for their public but desperately need our admiration for their bank balances.

HW absolutely knew that disgusting creep was using that young boy. She wouldn't have given a toss about it.

HW husband has always seemed arrogant also.
Saw him at TV awards 10 years ago outside, he deemed to look down on anyone that was just a member of the public.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.