Hi MNers, I'm hoping for someone to give me some perspective on the age old, to move or not to move question! It's long so you have all the detail you need, hopefully.
We're a family of 4 (preschool age and under) living in a 3rd floor flat in a pricey mid-sized Australian city. Our local property market is staying flat/slumping a tiny bit, so I'm considering whether now would be a good time to move to a house. DH is reluctant to move, so would take some persuading.
Current flat pros
- The flat is really nice (relatively modern inside, all electric, well insulated, we never hear the neighbours, ensuite, eat-in counter in kitchen, two basement car parks and small storage cage).
- It's in a great area (really bright and open, nice views for now, the complex has a couple of large grassy spaces for kids to play, safe neighbourhood with great primary schools, albeit a 20 min walk away, and several miles from the high schools). We're a 15 min drive from work and the city centre.
Current flat cons
- No backyard, and balcony is rarely used with the young kids.
- One of the bedrooms has a high window and no built-in wardrobes (the norm here) so it would do as a bedroom, but isn't brilliant.
- The complex also is up for a hefty repair bill for roofing and balcony works (estimated at 10k GBP per flat, and it is being contested by some owners. I've been living with mould in one ceiling for 18m, and now a cut out of the roof covered with plywood. Potentially it will be 18m until repaired.)
- The open fields next door will probably be built on, starting sometime in the next 5 years.
- Very limited storage... two built in wardrobes and the narrowest pantry you've probably seen.
Alternative house pros and cons
The types of houses we could afford would be a 1980s to 2000s-built house of around 1,100 sq ft on a ~5,000 sq ft block. It'd be 3 beds, 1 bathroom, and if lucky, there might be a double garage or second bathroom). It'd be around the same sq footage as our current place, and most likely older.
Public transport would be about the same, and we could probably get closer to a school and a secondary sized shopping centre, but twice as far from the city centre.
I'm open to only considering low maintenance houses and backyards that are close to good schools and small local shops, but there's little I can do about the mortgage doubling and commute time (except there's a chance DH would be able to transfer to a workplace closer to home, and I can wfh 2 days).
My view
I want to move to a house because I can't see us living in a flat as the kids get older. I feel like we go out a lot on the weekend because I don't like the kids being inside all day. I want a backyard so they can play outside - water play in summer, trampolines, home birthday parties etc - and the option to grow some veggies, install solar panels, relax outside while the kids play, and have bbqs with friends outside (we do this every couple of months, but we would do it so our friends with the biggest house can have a break from hosting!). DH could do with an area for his gym equipment (right now he's taken over the third bedroom).
Moving now vs later
The reason I want to look into this now is the price of houses feels within reach, but house price increases will outpace what we can save once interest rates start going down. Being completely honest, neither of us have help in any sense from our families, so I would like to have enough equity and capital appreciation so we can downsize when the kids move out and fund retirement or help them get started.
We can port our very low rate mortgage for the next two years, but we'd need to double the mortgage, and the remainder would be at current rates. I think things would be tight for the first few years (as in, not as tight as mat leave, definitely no expensive holidays or gadgets, minimal savings, but all bills met and a bit leftover to save or spend. I'm in a very stable job and promotion is likely on the cards in the next year or two, with regular pay increases from there).
I'd also like to get out now because I think it would be harder to sell while there are building works in the complex, or when that's finished, when next door is being built up.
Lastly, we would need to sell first and buy after, because of the portability rules and our risk appetites. It seems much easier to do this in a slower market.
DH's view
Doesn't want to leave the safe neighbourhood, excellent primary school, or close location to the city/work. He likes having two bathrooms. Any new place would be doubling our commute time. He thinks flat is big enough for us, and he doesn't want to fix up an older place or spend more time on yardwork or cleaning. He'd rather have extra cash than a bigger mortgage. The older the kids get, the less likely they are to appreciate outside space.
His preferred option is staying put, or failing that, asking our ground floor neighbour if he'd be open to selling us his flat (identical to ours), to get some outside space (~800 sq ft, half patio, half grass).
I think the halfway option would buy us time, but would be the best and worst of all worlds - small yard and no ability to make changes (eg adding solar or extensions), and all the worst of the common charges and renovation work.
WWYD? Thanks for any views!