Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Really impressed with the budget

437 replies

Fullrecoveryispossible · 15/03/2023 13:34

I’ll give it to the chancellor. He delivered a bloody good budget today. Childcare reform (including increasing rates paid to providers by 30%) and 30 hours free for 1&2 year olds. Uk has avoided recession despite a global pandemic and Ukrainian war, more money on occupational health, plan to get more people into work

OP posts:
BramleyAppleHotCrossBun · 15/03/2023 16:01

LocalHobo · 15/03/2023 14:56

It has 'given' my family, and thousands like us, absolutely nothing.

The 'no cap' on the amount paid into pensions before having to pay extra tax will benefit you maybe? Also the fuel duty being frozen will help drivers.

Can't wait to pay for my spiraling energy and food costs with the £100 that not increasing fuel duty would have saved.

Cheers Jez.

bubbles2023 · 15/03/2023 16:01

I wouldn't get too excited about the childcare funding. Who is building all these nurseries and training / recruiting all the staff? It's not like nursery work is glamorous and they're grossly underpaid. If anything, this policy will drive more nurseries to close.

GoodChat · 15/03/2023 16:04

@WeWereInParis ahh yes I think that's what I must have misunderstood, sorry, and thanks for highlighting it!

LightDrizzle · 15/03/2023 16:05

SouthCountryGirl · 15/03/2023 15:52

You have to prove that due to your disability you have care and /or mobility needs. Not that you have extra costs.

Correct.
I filled out DLA forms for years before PIP came in and found PIP a lot more humane and appropriate. The DLA form never failed to depress me and reduce me to tears, despite me thinking every time that I was mentally prepared.

I think this is a relatively good budget for women, and given the economic shitshow, we are in a better situation than I would have guessed a few months ago. They can’t promise something for everyone as they can’t fund it, someone always loses out when needs are prioritised. I don’t benefit from this budget but I don’t think a budget that would benefit me would be for the greater good at the moment.

Maybe Labour would generate more funds to allocate and prioritise better, I don’t know, but under present circumstances this is not a bad budget, taken together with the November budget. These are dark times across Europe.

beAsensible1 · 15/03/2023 16:09

Awwlookatmybabyspider · 15/03/2023 14:43

The energy price cap is guaranteed at 2,500 pa rather than 3,000. However that's still £200 a month or if you prefer 50 per week. Its probably not that much consolation for already severely impoverished families

note the cap is per utility to overall cost.

beAsensible1 · 15/03/2023 16:09

not*

Lancasterel · 15/03/2023 16:12

BramleyAppleHotCrossBun · 15/03/2023 13:44

Gosh I wonder why they chose that date they will never have to enact this because they won't be in power by then

Yes this was my first thought when I heard the dates!

GotABeatForYouMama · 15/03/2023 16:12

Pip is awarded due to extra care needs, not extra costs.

Not strictly true. For most cases it is, but if a person is deaf then PiP can be awarded to enable visual alarms to be fitted, to help with the cost of interpreters etc. It depends on the level of hearing loss/deafness but it's not based on care needs. Even those who are in managerial roles who are deaf can claim PiP.

www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/2022/april/dwp-reviews-pip-decisions-many-ddeaf-people

BenCoopersSupportWren · 15/03/2023 16:13

Postapocalypticcowgirl · 15/03/2023 14:33

The public sector is on its knees (NHS, Education, Social care and more) and he didn't even mention it.

That's not impressive at all.

I guess the distraction tactics of a childcare policy he will never have to fully implement are impressive in some ways.

There are two different mechanisms at play. The budget is, at its heart, a general statement of the country's financial position, the economy and any changes to taxation / allowances - the latter having an effect (or no effect, depending on personal circumstances) at an individual / household level.

Public sector departments are allocated their Treasury funding via Spending Reviews, each of which covers a three year period. We have currently just entered the final year of SR21, which set departmental resource and capital budgets from 2022-23 to 2024-25, so the next SR is due in 2024.

Beaglesonlyplease · 15/03/2023 16:14

And by the time it rolls around to enact the Tories just shrug and say can’t afford it now, we did want to.
Just like the 40 brand new hospitals.
Just like the 350,000,000 for the NHS.
but by then hardly anyone will care because it sounds good right now and like someone in government is in control and all the middle class parents with 2 children will vote for them because it sounds like it’ll help the poverty stricken, ill, disabled, carers, and of course the benefit scroungers to be forced to work and put their children in childcare (but not the same nursery as Tarquin and Rupert).
And all of society’s problems will be solved (except for rudeness, being late and having unexpected visitors).
People without young children don’t go to work for reasons that ought to, but of course are not being addressed here. Trying to say free childcare frees up all those relying on UC to work more .. not the real problem Tories!

ChristinaAlber · 15/03/2023 16:15

It's a good budget, lots to like. Those sneering that it's to win an election entirely missing the point - of course it is! Probably too late though.

Mutabiliss · 15/03/2023 16:17

They have announced this so that Labour will look bad when they say it can't be funded. The Tories are banking on losing the next election - a lot have already announced they won't stand - and Labour will have to clean up the mess (again).

swallowedAfly · 15/03/2023 16:18

Thank you for clarifying but - surely a person could be unfit for work without having additional care needs? Such people won't be able to access benefits anymore at all unless they agree to be a jobseeker. You can have a long term condition that sees you unfit to work currently/for the foreseeable future and yet not qualify for PIP. I'm unclear how those people will be able to claim benefits unless they have to go along with a pretence that they're fully able to take on full time work and presumably be sanctioned if they don't do so.

WeWereInParis · 15/03/2023 16:20

swallowedAfly · 15/03/2023 16:18

Thank you for clarifying but - surely a person could be unfit for work without having additional care needs? Such people won't be able to access benefits anymore at all unless they agree to be a jobseeker. You can have a long term condition that sees you unfit to work currently/for the foreseeable future and yet not qualify for PIP. I'm unclear how those people will be able to claim benefits unless they have to go along with a pretence that they're fully able to take on full time work and presumably be sanctioned if they don't do so.

I'm unclear how those people will be able to claim benefits unless they have to go along with a pretence that they're fully able to take on full time work and presumably be sanctioned if they don't do so.

I imagine that's the point.

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 15/03/2023 16:22

GotABeatForYouMama · 15/03/2023 16:12

Pip is awarded due to extra care needs, not extra costs.

Not strictly true. For most cases it is, but if a person is deaf then PiP can be awarded to enable visual alarms to be fitted, to help with the cost of interpreters etc. It depends on the level of hearing loss/deafness but it's not based on care needs. Even those who are in managerial roles who are deaf can claim PiP.

www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/2022/april/dwp-reviews-pip-decisions-many-ddeaf-people

Pip is awarded for the need for the alarms.
people don’t actually need to fit the alarms though.

Its like the care needs - you can be awarded PiP for the need even if the need is not being met.

swallowedAfly · 15/03/2023 16:23

Yes. I suspect so WeWereInParis.

They won't even have access to the so called 'support' for people with long term health problems seeing as those problems won't exist allegedly as they don't get PIP.

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 15/03/2023 16:23

swallowedAfly · 15/03/2023 16:18

Thank you for clarifying but - surely a person could be unfit for work without having additional care needs? Such people won't be able to access benefits anymore at all unless they agree to be a jobseeker. You can have a long term condition that sees you unfit to work currently/for the foreseeable future and yet not qualify for PIP. I'm unclear how those people will be able to claim benefits unless they have to go along with a pretence that they're fully able to take on full time work and presumably be sanctioned if they don't do so.

They won’t be able to claim. That’s exactly the point.

It’ll be dressed as a widening of Pip and giving people more freedom.

In reality it’s yet another attack on disabled people and disability benefits.

YetMoreNewBeginnings · 15/03/2023 16:25

It’s exactly the same as the bereavement benefit changes

That was dressed as a “widening” and “equalising” because the over 45 age limit for those without children was removed.

In reality it absolute decimation of the amount people widowed with young children receive. From help until the child is 16/18 (unless they remarry) down to £350 a month for 18 months plus a lump sum.

EmGB87 · 15/03/2023 16:26

MrsSamR · 15/03/2023 14:54

@EmGB87 exactly this!

My husband is a high earner (over £100k) but I am on a much lower salary and work part-time to reduce our childcare costs.

Because of the way we do our finances I pay for childcare and my husband for everything else (mortgage/bills etc). When my second DD starts nursery in October the combined costs as we only qualify for 15 hours for my eldest will be more than I earn so he will be supplementing to cover our childcare bill.

His salary is over £100k but his take home is nothing like that as he is taxed so heavily on his earnings and the cost of living is still obviously affecting us. The misconception that people on 6 figure salaries are living in mansions and driving sports cars is completely inaccurate. We live in a modest 3-bed semi in the SW (mortgaged) and share a car between us.

To have once again been overlooked for help with childcare costs is disappointing especially as a family with 2 parents on £99k each would qualify while we don't. It needs addressing properly.

@MrsSamR we are in exactly the same position. When our second starts nursery in September we’re in trouble. I don’t know what we’re going to do…we’ve already cut everything we can.

AlecTrevelyan006 · 15/03/2023 16:26

As a non-Tory voter, my view is that the budget is about as good as could be expected in the current political and economic circumstances.

Mondayblues23 · 15/03/2023 16:29

StylishM · 15/03/2023 13:40

I agree but I'm slightly dismayed at the delays to the childcare funding - you would have to conceive at Christmas 2024 (21 months away) to benefit from the 30 hours funding from 9 months Sad

Doesn't help those who are pregnant or currently paying £££££ in childcare NOW.

Thought exactly the same.

Got excited when I first read it until I realised how far away it is!

LikeTearsInRain · 15/03/2023 16:31

Fantastic job from the Tories!

Hostofgoldendaffodils · 15/03/2023 16:32

There's no such thing as free childcare, just higher taxes.

swallowedAfly · 15/03/2023 16:32

It sounds like they should fund some budget skills training for people who feel they can't manage on over 100k a year! They clearly need some serious help.

anyolddinosaur · 15/03/2023 16:33

OP must be Mr or Mrs Hunt or someone who works for them. Apart from ending the prepayment meter scandal and maybe helping pubs survive cant see a lot in it. Energy prices are falling - government "help" might actually not be needed - and lets not forget it was Tories refusing to fund gas storage that made things worse than other countries. Where is the household funding for energy efficiency measures?

Child care changes mean worse standard of care for children and maybe jam tomorrow - except that they are unlikely to deliver it.

Boasting about increases in benefits that only cover past inflation and as the increase in food costs is higher than inflation generally doesnt help those who spend more of their income on food.

I'm sure we all appreciate our MPS being able to put more money into their pensions under the guise of helping the NHS. Are their pensions still paid from age 65 and anyone know what the taxpayer contribution currently is?