Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Cultural circumcision in babies/young boys

608 replies

junipermarten · 13/01/2023 14:46

1 of my DS's is circumcised due to a medical issue, he was 3 at the time and it was bloody horrific.

When he was going through it, a good friend gave me tips on after care and offered the number of a private doctor. She has sons who were circumcised shortly after birth for religious reasons.

I personally don't agree with circumcision unless medically required however I respect others choices for religious reasons.

It got me thinking about the high % of boys in the US who are circumcised for cultural reasons, just over 2/3rds. Why is it so prevalent there?

I was having a look at % of male pop per country and the highest were mainly Islamic, but also Samoa was almost 100% which surprised me but apparently its cultural as opposed to religious (I think).

OP posts:
Hoppinggreen · 14/01/2023 12:57

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/01/2023 12:34

What Science are you talking about? Science that will have studied circumcised men to gather outcomes? Given that billions of men have it happen, how come I'm not seeing peer reviewed research that indicates widespread, long term damage and calling for a ban. Its very common in the US, one of the most litigious countries in the world yet not even they have seen widespread challenges to its legality.

And yes, circumcised men need to take the lead because they are the "victims". Anyone else is claiming victimhood on their behalf which is weird.

The victims are baby boys so someone has to speak for them

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/01/2023 13:03

As I said, they grow into men who can speak for themselves.

Kissedbyfire1 · 14/01/2023 13:08

mathanxiety · 13/01/2023 20:59

@Kissedbyfire1
I'm guessing the original reasons were to do with sandy environment, and probably also a mark of group identity, similar to facial tattoos or other body markings.

Thank you. It amazes me to think that someone long ago thought “that’s a good idea”, tried it, persuaded others to do it and now… here we are, millions upon millions of men without their foreskin 😳🤷‍♀️

RampantIvy · 14/01/2023 13:11

HaroldeVwilliam · 14/01/2023 12:53

I heard of a religion/tribe in Africa or perhaps Amazon where they make yong boys get stung by bees or something like that and another that chops off the tips of a toe and finger.

I don't respect the part of any religion that gives an adult a free card to chop off or mutilate someone else's body as a vulnerable unaware child.

I saw this on TV. It is the bullet ant glove test of the Mawe people in the Amazon

probably also a mark of group identity, similar to facial tattoos or other body markings.

Do they really take their pants down and compare?

bellac11 · 14/01/2023 13:15

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/01/2023 13:03

As I said, they grow into men who can speak for themselves.

All abused children grow into adults (the ones that survive anyway), do we stop campaigning and supporting child safety and child protection procedures?

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/01/2023 13:22

We support abuse survivors as they heal and seek justice. We amplify their voices. It is not the same as conferring victimhood on billions of men who don't consider themselves victims, because we disagree with one of their cultural/religious practices.

bellac11 · 14/01/2023 13:34

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/01/2023 13:22

We support abuse survivors as they heal and seek justice. We amplify their voices. It is not the same as conferring victimhood on billions of men who don't consider themselves victims, because we disagree with one of their cultural/religious practices.

There are large numbers of women who have experienced FGM who also dont see themselves as victims and agree to the same practice taking place for their daughters and/or are the cutters themselves.

Do we recognise their abuse and mutilation or ignore it because they support FGM?

UserNinetyNine · 14/01/2023 13:57

It’s just so fucked up to me that people’s gods/imaginary friends are considered “protected characteristics” but parts of their baby boys bodies are not.

pointythings · 14/01/2023 14:37

@LicketySquid well, I for one agree that puberty blockers and other more permanent methods of gender reassignment should not be practiced on under 18s - I think it's important that young people with gender dysphoria should first mature physically and emotionally, with the aid of as much counselling as is needed (pipe dream unless you are very wealthy). But that is of course a straw man because there is a huge difference in capacity to consent between a newborn baby and a teenager.

pointythings · 14/01/2023 14:37

And yes, I'd like to see the mental gymnastics from the pro circumcision brigade when asked how they feel about FGM.

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/01/2023 14:59

bellac11 · 14/01/2023 13:34

There are large numbers of women who have experienced FGM who also dont see themselves as victims and agree to the same practice taking place for their daughters and/or are the cutters themselves.

Do we recognise their abuse and mutilation or ignore it because they support FGM?

No one is asking your support for circumcision.

Banning hasn't worked for FGM, laws are not enforced. Where there has been progress in reducing/abolition of FGM it has been led by women in the communities that practice it, not a saviour riding in from somewhere else.

bellac11 · 14/01/2023 15:13

The law hasnt completely solved the problem, a bit like laws about theft or drink driving, but it has made it clear that it wont be tolerated and isnt acceptable no matter what cultural traditions are bandied about and prosecutions have taken place

pointythings · 14/01/2023 15:32

The laws are still relatively new and could do with some tweaks and better enforcement, but just because they aren't perfect that doesn't mean we should not have them - that would be collusion.

Xrays · 14/01/2023 16:08

bellac11 · 14/01/2023 15:13

The law hasnt completely solved the problem, a bit like laws about theft or drink driving, but it has made it clear that it wont be tolerated and isnt acceptable no matter what cultural traditions are bandied about and prosecutions have taken place

Exactly.

Are people seriously trying to hint that because FGM still happens it was pointless making it illegal?

What about rape…
Murder….
Drink driving etc .. any crime at all.

We make things illegal because not only can we punish those who do them but also because it sends out a signal to others about what our society finds acceptable, or not.

Abhannmor · 14/01/2023 16:38

In the States it's just another item on your medical bill of course. They justify it with scare stories about the terrible infections your son will get if it doesn't happen.

I had an Internet argument with a US woman about it. She eventually gave up on the medical excuses and said ' Well I think foreskins look gross and he'd never get a girlfriend.'

Meanwhile back in reality a baby bled to death here a few years ago after a botched and unnecessary 'operation '.

It's just a hangover from religion - a sacrifice to some vengeful god. Why do we allow it?

Mumtobabyhavoc · 14/01/2023 17:43

Snugglemonkey · 13/01/2023 22:06

They are the same thing. It is just about degree of damage.

I struggle to reconcile it being okay for one child but not another based on anatomy and that one culture/religion is right and another barbaric.

red4321 · 14/01/2023 17:53

Well I think foreskins look gross and he'd never get a girlfriend.'

I'm don't spend a lot of time pondering what different dicks look like but, if I had to choose, I'd pick uncircumcised. The other is a bit shiny and grim-looking in comparison.

I'll see myself out...

Xrays · 14/01/2023 17:58

red4321 · 14/01/2023 17:53

Well I think foreskins look gross and he'd never get a girlfriend.'

I'm don't spend a lot of time pondering what different dicks look like but, if I had to choose, I'd pick uncircumcised. The other is a bit shiny and grim-looking in comparison.

I'll see myself out...

I can’t see how anyone would pick anyone based on foreskin anyway unless you were literally on Naked Attraction….! 😳😆 Generally it’s not the first thing I tend to see!

red4321 · 14/01/2023 18:07

Well indeed, it did pain me to type it out, frankly, and it was only in response to the 'you'll never get a girlfriend otherwise' rationale.

TomPinch · 14/01/2023 18:14

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/01/2023 12:34

What Science are you talking about? Science that will have studied circumcised men to gather outcomes? Given that billions of men have it happen, how come I'm not seeing peer reviewed research that indicates widespread, long term damage and calling for a ban. Its very common in the US, one of the most litigious countries in the world yet not even they have seen widespread challenges to its legality.

And yes, circumcised men need to take the lead because they are the "victims". Anyone else is claiming victimhood on their behalf which is weird.

It's not about claiming victimhood on anyone's behalf but simply recognising (in light of current knowledge) when a practice is unnecessary and harmful. This is all very normal. We don't generally wait for the alleged victims to request change.

Snugglemonkey · 14/01/2023 19:32

Mumtobabyhavoc · 14/01/2023 17:43

I struggle to reconcile it being okay for one child but not another based on anatomy and that one culture/religion is right and another barbaric.

Because it really isn't. There are no circumstances under which anyone should decide to cut the genitals of another human being unless medically necessary.

mathanxiety · 14/01/2023 19:36

What 'current knowledge' is that, @TomPinch ?

Are you conflating 'current knowledge' with 'The Opinion of Some British People'?

mathanxiety · 14/01/2023 19:41

@FloydPepper

Open challenge using neutral language and respectful tone = acceptable.

Open challenge that includes inflammatory terms, denigration, and terms that have been used historically to stir up racial or ethnic hatred = unacceptable.

If you missed it in history class, there's enough information available on the internet to allow a responsible cultural commentator to figure out where the lines should be drawn.

mathanxiety · 14/01/2023 19:44

@Weefreetiffany

There are men who have a point of comparison, a before and after experience of the comfort and sensitivity of the glans.

Weefreetiffany · 14/01/2023 19:52

Anxiety, I’m not saying there aren’t. What’s your point?

Swipe left for the next trending thread