Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

It is not illegal to be an asylum seeker

231 replies

antelopevalley · 13/12/2022 23:40

It is legal to cross the channel in a boat and claim asylum when you reach Britain. People who do this are not illegal, they are acting within the law.

OP posts:
SommerTen · 14/12/2022 09:49

They are usually political opponents of the Iranian regime.

SnowlayRoundabout · 14/12/2022 09:51

But I also want the NHS to cope

The NHS doesn't cope partly because it is massively understaffed post Brexit. Meanwhile, we have asylum seekers who are qualified health professionals being prevented from working for years on end because the system is so slow. We also have asylum seekers who could fill many of the non-clinical vacancies in the NHS. Why not simply allow asylum seekers to work?

kirinm · 14/12/2022 09:53

@sevenbyseven a third of people coming by boat are Albanian according to news yesterday. Why are you deliberately lying? You appreciate that means that 2/3rds are not from Albania?

plusk · 14/12/2022 09:57

SommerTen · 14/12/2022 09:49

They are usually political opponents of the Iranian regime.

theyre economic and social immigrants mostly.

Not much to do with regime directly, just want to live in a normal country.
I have ties to the community in LDN , many os them claimed asylum but reality is different.

Greenfairydust · 14/12/2022 09:58

''@Member589500 · Today 01:10
They are PROBABLY ALL illegal entrants as Immigration law does not allow a person to knowingly enter the UK without leave. If a person is from a country which requires pre clearance (visa) they are entering illegally E.g. Albania.
.''

Rubbish.

People are allowed to claim asylum. it is not illegal.

They are only ''illegal'' if they fail to claim asylum when they arrive and try to disappear.

This vile government has removed options for people to claim asylum in any other way so all they have left is to try to cross and then make a claim.

This Daily Mail inspired rhetoric has to stop....

The French made it clear that the UK has resisted all attempt to allow people to claim asylum in the UK on French soil and set up a proper processing centre there.

RafaistheKingofClay · 14/12/2022 09:58

The ‘they’re economic migrants’ argument is getting dafter and dafter given we have a labour shortage across multiple areas of the economy at the moment. Especially in the NHS.

It would be better for the country to speed up their claims so they can start working.

antelopevalley · 14/12/2022 09:59

plusk · 13/12/2022 23:52

I thought crossing illegally is illegal.

It is not illegal if you are claiming asylum.

OP posts:
sevenbyseven · 14/12/2022 09:59

kirinm · 14/12/2022 09:53

@sevenbyseven a third of people coming by boat are Albanian according to news yesterday. Why are you deliberately lying? You appreciate that means that 2/3rds are not from Albania?

Sorry I wasn't deliberately lying. Are Albanians the number one group then, or is Iranians as quoted by a previous poster? I should have checked the figures before saying that.

antelopevalley · 14/12/2022 10:00

ImustLearn2Cook · 14/12/2022 03:38

I agree it is wrong to call asylum seekers illegal. It’s factually incorrect and it promotes discrimination. It encourages people to turn a blind eye to the way these people are treated. People justify the mistreatment of asylum seekers because they view them as illegal immigrants who shouldn’t break the law. It’s defamatory.

I know that the below is from Australia rather than the UK but I think it could still be relevant.

Why calling people ‘illegal’ is wrong

There are many reasons why it is wrong to call people seeking asylum ‘illegal’. It wrongly suggests these people are criminals. It fosters prejudice towards outsiders. It also suggests these people do not have rights.’

www.refugeecouncil.org.au/illegals/

Thank you for this. It is an important point.

OP posts:
narkyspirit · 14/12/2022 10:02

Hoardasurass · 14/12/2022 01:03

That's not quite true under maritime law the classification of vessel that are manly used in these crossing are baned from the shipping lanes and merely entering them let alone travelling through them (which many do) is a crime and as such it is technically an illegal crossing. Basically it's the equivalent of taking a bicycle on a motorway. Whilst I know that using this technicality to call them illegal crossing is not only a massive overstatement but grossly inflammatory, it is however true in the technical way and as such the press and government can get away with it.

you can cross the shipping lanes in any vessel,

IRPCS Rule 10

(c) A vessel shall, so far as practicable, avoid crossing traffic lanes but if obliged to do so shall cross on a heading as nearly as practicable at right angles to the general direction of traffic flow.

Greenfairydust · 14/12/2022 10:02

''@sevenbyseven · Today 04:12

No has to take a small boat to the UK to claim asylum - you're supposed to claim asylum in the first safe country you arrive in.''

Again this is incorrect. There is no legal requirement whatsoever for them to claim in the fist safe country they arrive in.

sevenbyseven · 14/12/2022 10:02

www.bbc.com/news/explainers-53734793.amp

35% are Albanians which is the largest proportion but I was wrong to state it was the majority.

kirinm · 14/12/2022 10:04

Yes and those others which you failed to acknowledge are coming from countries we know are at war. The majority of people coming by boat are coming from countries where their lives are at risk.

kirinm · 14/12/2022 10:07

This country is totally disgusting.

"Last night UNHCR, the UN refugee agency, strongly condemned the asylum policy unveiled by Rishi Sunak. In a statement, its assistant high commissioner for protection, Gillian Triggs, said:
The announced proposal to first detain, and then either return asylum-seekers to their home countries, or transfer them to a third country would amount to a denial of access to the UK asylum system for those who arrive irregularly.
That approach would close down access to asylum in the UK for all but a few. This would likely result in refugees having no means to establish their status and place them at risk of forced return to unsafe countries, in breach of the Refugee Convention. It would also undermine the global refugee system at large and would be a violation of international refugee law".

antelopevalley · 14/12/2022 10:12

The government itself is to blame for economic migrants. Fund the system properly so people are processed and returned quickly. If people are returned quickly, that will be seen in their countries of origin and discourage people from making the journey.

OP posts:
narkyspirit · 14/12/2022 10:12

Talia99 · 14/12/2022 00:21

Nope. If I won the lottery and bought a yacht in France before sailing it back to the UK, I would have no obligation to notify anyone I was crossing until I arrived. If I didn’t check in with customs / immigration, that might be illegal but none of my actions until then would be. The same goes for people who aren’t British. It isn’t (yet) a crime to travel without a visa.

Asylum seekers by definition check in with the authorities to make their claim for asylum so they are not illegal at any time.

If their application for asylum plus any appeals are turned down and they don’t leave (which can take years), then they become illegal immigrants.

almost correct

Your vessel is obliged to 'wear' a Q flag when you arrive in uk territorial waters 12 miles offshore, you must call National Yacht line to announce your arrival, persons on board, port/marina you are headed to etc and wait with the crew on board if requested by them until border force have visited.

pointythings · 14/12/2022 10:14

Thank you for posting this, OP. More people should be shouting about it.

roarfeckingroarr · 14/12/2022 10:15

We need to clear the tails and fast track acceptance of genuine asylum seekers and quick return of the rest. We can't keep on letting thousands upon thousands of young men, many of whom are economic migrants not in genuine need of asylum, disappear into the country. Neither should we demonise people who genuinely need help and want to build a life, conform to liberal values (women / men as equal for a start) and contribute to society.

antelopevalley · 14/12/2022 10:15

The whole technical discussion about maritime law is bizarre. You are talking about the boats and gangs running them.
The people travelling are asylum seekers and it is not illegal to be an asylum seeker. It is legal to travel to the UK and claim asylum on arrival.

OP posts:
antelopevalley · 14/12/2022 10:16

@pointythings Thanks

OP posts:
RafaistheKingofClay · 14/12/2022 10:22

The government usually only wheel out stuff on asylum seekers like this when they are trying to distract from something. What have they done now?

StillWeRise · 14/12/2022 10:25

this morning's awful news....who can imagine getting on a boat with their children in this weather...there's just no way you would do this without a very very good reason
our government shames us and with their willingness to break international law

antelopevalley · 14/12/2022 10:49

@RafaistheKingofClay Very good point.

OP posts:
MrsSkylerWhite · 14/12/2022 10:52

The cynical attempt to “other” human beings to distract from its complete failure and incompetence is shameful. It’s the only thing they have left in the armoury to try to retain red wall seats.

Bunda · 14/12/2022 10:55

Agree