As far as I understand it, when Baker days were introduced, they were five days for teacher CPD, taken from school holiday (i.e. the number of days kids were in school stayed the same).
But when term dates for schools are published, they always include the inset days as term-time days.
This makes it look as though time is being taken away from teaching kids, which it isn't.
But my main issue with it is that it can also be confusing if, as with my local schools, the term dates are on a different part of the webpage or a different page altogether from the inset days, if the inset days have even been decided yet (so you have to mentally knock those ones off the official term dates when working out when kids are expected in school). Surely the vast majority of the people who need to know term dates are actually in need of information about what days the kids are expected in school? It seems like it would make more sense for inset days to be tacked onto one end of the term/half-term as it is now, but considered not term-time for the purposes of published term dates… is it to allow for training days partway through the term or something?
(I don't have kids in school, I use term dates mainly to predict parking and traffic in my area, among other things.)