Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

I struggle to get my head around the size of the Chinese property collapse & it's global consequences.

169 replies

StrawberryMarble · 22/08/2022 08:45

Is anyone else following this? Because it will affect us for sure down the line. 65 MILLION properties in China are in a limbo of being half built & the developers have run out of funds. This is way way bigger than the sub-prime crisis in the US. Blocks of flats are being demolished in their thousands. The Chinese government is pumping trillions in to keep the economy afloat. I think we're in for an unprecidented global recession that will bite longer & harder than ever before when you add in the cost of covid and the energy crisis.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
PerfectlyPreservedQuagaarWarrior · 22/08/2022 18:04

Zilla1 · 22/08/2022 17:51

Before people get too hung up on command economy and pigeons coming home to roost, perhaps look at brith dates in South Korea, Japan, Italy and other economies that don't have command and control contexts. It would appear countries where it's difficult to balance work and child care and where men don't help with child care don't encourage educated women to have large families and patriotic exertion by governments who don't back up words with deeds doesn't make women decide to have more children. Some argue competitive environments encourage parents to choose to have at most one child and support their education in China, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan.

The difference being that these societies didn't start experiencing this phenomenon until they were prosperous, and it's happening more slowly. And even then they stand to experience problems because of it. China's position is unique and that's directly attributable to state interventions in fertility.

DeadHouseBounce · 22/08/2022 18:07

Zilla1 · 22/08/2022 17:57

The other dimension is that some long-term thinking about corporates is easier in a command economy. People might think Evergrande is a symptom or a disaster but it's possible their government has made aa rational decision to mitigate future trouble. They seem to have reined in Alibaba and lots of big tech to avoid a future where power is concentrated in a few powerful corporates who can exploit the public and challenge the state. Am not advocating it nor the other political decisions made but sometimes it is better to deflate bubbles sooner than later. Western economies in retrospect and given the choice might have preferred to have prevented 2008 even if the power and levers would have made this difficult/impossible?

Nah, it is far too late for the China property bubble and the Western/Global property bubble, they are just going to burst now, and it will be messy, if you borrowed a lot of money to join in there is going to be pain.

goshy · 22/08/2022 18:10

I read an interesting article on Japan & how they have been preparing for the ageing population. Apparently the gov here had started looking into things but were sidetracked by Brexit.

China introduced the 3 child policy last year I believe but it's far too late.

In terms of impacting us, one issue impacting inflation here is the impact of covid/lockdown in china.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

goshy · 22/08/2022 18:15

Much of the West has an ageing population. The U.K. already has more over 65s than under 15s which has happened quicker than predicted I believe.

Zilla1 · 22/08/2022 18:19

Didn't say China property bubble wouldn't pop, just that it might be a rational, deliberate act to preclude something worse later that might destabilise their party rule.

Regarding population, the last time I looked, South Korea's reproduction rate was half that of China and without the hang over of a previously state enforced one child policy. Haven't looked when South Korea's population will crest.

Japan is interesting as I think their government made the decision it would be better to avoid the immigration that some Western governments use to maintain population and rather maintain a somewhat homogenous population. China is probably too big to import labour even if it wanted to. Think it has made massive investments in overseas resources and is investing in automation to try and maintain economic growth and tax revenues when populations retire. Geo politics and environmental concerns will make the next 50? years interesting. Perhaps better not to be massively indebted and with a low growth low productivity economy. The one truly massive economic risk arguably doesn't relate to China's real estate market.

Zilla1 · 22/08/2022 18:27

Some estimates has South Korea's working age population decreasing by c1/3 by 2050, different to total population but still.

onthefencesitter · 22/08/2022 19:14

Zilla1 · 22/08/2022 18:19

Didn't say China property bubble wouldn't pop, just that it might be a rational, deliberate act to preclude something worse later that might destabilise their party rule.

Regarding population, the last time I looked, South Korea's reproduction rate was half that of China and without the hang over of a previously state enforced one child policy. Haven't looked when South Korea's population will crest.

Japan is interesting as I think their government made the decision it would be better to avoid the immigration that some Western governments use to maintain population and rather maintain a somewhat homogenous population. China is probably too big to import labour even if it wanted to. Think it has made massive investments in overseas resources and is investing in automation to try and maintain economic growth and tax revenues when populations retire. Geo politics and environmental concerns will make the next 50? years interesting. Perhaps better not to be massively indebted and with a low growth low productivity economy. The one truly massive economic risk arguably doesn't relate to China's real estate market.

Look at singapore. it is 1.14, lower than China. The average apartment in Singapore is 1000 square feet (same size as an average uk house). I calculated that even as a singaporean living in London, I would receive the equivalent of £10k for having a baby (and the singaporeans who actually live in singapore would get even more in the form of childcare subsidy, domestic helper subsidy). I am still childless at 30 and not planning to have more than one child.

The birth rate is still very low. One big factor is the long working hours; people don't have time for bigger families . Another factor is the competitive environment- people want to invest more in their children. However, its still common to have 2 children in singapore; what brings down the stats is the many people who stay unmarried due to being unable to find suitable partners. Another thing about East Asian societies is that it is virtually unheard of to live with an unmarried partner and even start a family with an unmarried partner. So if you don't get married, you don't have children. End of story. In the west, a lot of women choose to have children with and without marriage and I think that does increase the birth rate. While many of these women do end up getting married/end up staying in a long term relationship that is like a de facto marriage, i think that the woman's willingness to have kids pre marriage does probably mean she has more children overall as she 'starts earlier'.

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 22/08/2022 19:23

Yes, , I’ve read about it, and there was recently a programme on either R4 or the World Service, can’t remember which.

Presumably this will just be another reason why Chinese people who haven’t lost all their money buying flats that are never finished, will be putting their cash into new build flats in the U.K., Canada, Australia, etc. - and often leaving them empty. Just (relatively) safe places to park their money.

onedayiwillmissthis · 22/08/2022 19:44

Peter Zeihans book The End of the World Is Just the Beginning: Mapping the Collapse of Globalization

And a simple, clear discussion on population collapse, on the Modern Wisdom Podcast

open.spotify.com/episode/2StuDwNDeU9JPMcmIe6Hbm?si=n0unNc07QwaH6l72XqyN_Q&utm_source=copy-link

angeltop · 22/08/2022 19:44

Meanwhile in the Uk massive swathes of housing and apartment blocks are being bought by Chinese consortiums. Far more lucrative than anything they can buy and sell in China.

TonTonMacoute · 22/08/2022 19:47

BeethovenNinth · 22/08/2022 09:48

Why don’t I read this stuff in mainstream news?

What do you call mainstream!? There's plenty about in a number of newspapers and weekly news magazines.

boatyardblues · 22/08/2022 19:55

BringOnSummerHolidays · 22/08/2022 10:12

I have heard about it via Evergrande, and also the population collapse. I didn't think it'll affect us here though!

Chinese investors have bought up masses of UK properties, often off plan, which is why there are apartment blocks with almost no residents in some UK cities. I remember reading somewhere that a lot of rental property in some parts of the UK is also Chinese-owned. I am not an economist, but someone who has seen property prices affected by market forces and old enough to remember negative equity in the 90s. If foreign investors offload all that property en masse it would flood some markets here and drop prices.

PeekAtYou · 22/08/2022 20:00

Thank you for starting this thread. I had no idea about this problem 😳 but will be keeping an eye on this.

Wallywobbles · 22/08/2022 20:12

This is from Reddit

It's a complex financial nightmare but I'll try to TL;DR it:

  1. China has a rapidly growing middle class. There isn't a lot of investment opportunities for them because of Chinese laws, but they can buy real estate.
  2. China is rapidly urbanizing. Lots of people are moving to cities for jobs and better quality of life.
  3. Property in cities started getting pretty hot due to #2, and people started investing in it due to #1.
  4. Chinese upper class and biog companies saw this, and started building like crazy to sell property to all these new buyers.
  5. The Chinese financial market is a crazy byzantine mess (even moreso than US/Euro markets), and a lot of loans are very "unofficial" and off the books.
  6. HUGE BUILDING BOOM AND HOUSING BUBBLE GOES HERE
  7. The market starts to cool off as the government cracks down and some new investment opportunities open up.
  8. Bubble starts lookin' not so sustainable
  9. Financial panic, insane web of off-the-books loans starts dragging companies under, total fuckin' shitstorm.
  10. Government steps in to help stabilize, starts bringing the hammer down on some billionaires to make examples, things mellow out a bit.
  11. WE ARE HERE - Everybody is waiting to see what happens next.
Justanotherlurker · 22/08/2022 20:13

The Chinese property bubble was always going to come to a head, it was pushed for years on social media channels as a quick win.

The situation is that people where paying for properties that would be built in a years time, the banks still expected your monthly mortgage payment despite you not physically having a property, so people had to juggle this along with rent or general living costs. In a lot of cases families clubbed together to buy an off the book appartment that will be built in the next couple of years and struggle.

But as is the Chinese way, corruption and cutting corners to keep the higher up the political chain happy is a thing, there is entire ghost cities that people have invested in that is litterally falling apart with shoddy standards and not fit for living in, meanwhile all those 'investors' have been paying a mortgage on an apartment that is in some extreme cases worth less than what they have already paid in, add into the mix where Chinese culture was hiding your money under your bed recently speaking, to 'small rural' banks freezing access has added another layer onto multiple others that are there.

With XI in power and not wanting to lose face, those saying they don't want to stress or think about it will have an unfortunate slap in face.

Brahumbug · 22/08/2022 20:26

China's population is expected to halve by 2100, not 2050, very different scenario.

Justanotherlurker · 22/08/2022 20:39

China's population is expected to halve by 2100, not 2050, very different scenario.

You are correct, and in all situations China is in trouble, there is a reason why the CCP are allowing protests to break out to 'national' banks.

djdkdkddkek · 22/08/2022 20:50

PerfectlyPreservedQuagaarWarrior · 22/08/2022 11:15

I suspect it was a combination of primarily thinking in the shorter term, ideology and not realising how successful the policy would actually be. Ie, large swathes of society essentially choosing to observe a one child policy, if that, even after they were able to have more.

The greater burden of elder care when you're the only child and sometimes grandchild seems to be a vicious circle too, ie there are people who feel they can't practically or financially have a child or a second child because of the responsibilities of work and providing for older parents.

I’m actually speechless about it I didn’t realise it was steep
ots quite worrying actually

djdkdkddkek · 22/08/2022 20:53

JohnRokesmith · 22/08/2022 11:19

It's essentially the consequence of short-termism in a command economy. The Chinese government realised, in the 1970s, that they needed to bring the population under control, so they instituted a one-child policy. This was massively beneficial in the short-term, allowing relative family wealth to rise as families had to look after fewer children, but ends up producing a population decline that comes on rapidly, as you end up with two problems. The first is that, in a patriarchal country, families want sons, and you end up with significant sex imbalances. The second is that, as children are expected (and in some cases legally required) to look after their parents, you end up with people choosing not to have children themselves, as they can no longer afford it.

And, of course, China is now discovering that it is easier to stop people from having children, than to make them have bigger families. Moreover, there was an expectation that economic growth would allow the state to offset the consequences of the population shift, where it is now becoming apparent that much of the wealth generated in China is being sucked into a massive real-estate bubble.

A few years ago, the expectation was that the population of China would decrease after 2050. Then it was revised to 2030. Right now, it looks like the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics will report a decline this year, and that they may be lying, and that the population has already started to take effect.

Funnily enough I always felt really scared and uneasy about the 1 child policy (aside from tne obvious unease that is!) I always thought girls would be very unsafe

do you think they will promote people moving to china or just cook tne books? 2030 is only 8 years away! What on earth do they propose to do?

pensions are like pyramid schemes I think. More in more out. Bit how the heck do you manage that with such a decline? Has that even happened outside of war/ natural disaster?

Featuredcreature · 22/08/2022 20:55

There was a good trigonometry or Corbett report about this. A guy saying that China will collapse wrt population. Also about peak population, which is apparently in the past.

Justanotherlurker · 22/08/2022 21:11

People focusing on the one chold policy are not really understanding the current situation, the reason why CCP dropped the policy was because it has generally been ignored over the past decade.

China's one child policy have contributed to a 1.5Bn population, decrease is a thing because Apple etc can't rely on Chinese concetraion camps of the Uyghur.

China isn't messed up because of a one child policy, it's a contributing factor but anyone having a basic grasp of geopolitics will know that it can be summed up into a reductive argument of China being China, the issue is that what the old saying of scenario of when the US sneezed the world coughed, it now relates to China, but the issue is that China hasn't been truthful in having a sneeze

Zilla1 · 22/08/2022 21:13

@onthefencesitter Thank you. Had forgotten about Singapore as a data point - another nation with some cultural/ethnic overlap but without a legal one child policy but with a low birth rate all the same.

Must admit the price of Singaporean real estate seemed expensive too though arguably backed by better fundamentals (occupancy and economy) than much of China.

Do you think you'll eventually raise your family in the UK or return to Singapore?

ScreamingMeMe · 22/08/2022 21:16

Pixiedust1234 · 22/08/2022 09:05

I thought China had the best and most stable economy? Partly due to the government being so controlling?

If not...then dear God...we are in for one hell of a bumpy ride 😯

The only thing they've been controlling is the narrative.

onthefencesitter · 22/08/2022 22:02

Zilla1 · 22/08/2022 21:13

@onthefencesitter Thank you. Had forgotten about Singapore as a data point - another nation with some cultural/ethnic overlap but without a legal one child policy but with a low birth rate all the same.

Must admit the price of Singaporean real estate seemed expensive too though arguably backed by better fundamentals (occupancy and economy) than much of China.

Do you think you'll eventually raise your family in the UK or return to Singapore?

www.singsaver.com.sg/blog/costs-of-bto-flat-resale-flat-ec-and-condo-in-singapore

If you buy government housing, it is cheaper than in london. You have to be a citizen or married/ a single who is at least 35 years of age to qualify but the income ceiling to buy government housing is around £100k so most people qualify (even professionals would because you generally don't start off on 6 figures!)

My cousin who is my age spent 50% of what I spend on a flat in london on a 2 bed new build 'starter flat'. she spent 350,000 SGD which is roughly £212k. My 2 bed flat in London cost me £400k. Of course the larger flats in nicer locations in singapore would be much more and certainly the private condos would be more. However, just like most londoners don't start out in a £1.5 million house, neither do singaporeans and even richer people would buy a government flat first and then upgrade in later life. But the fact that home ownership is so accessible means that the vast majority of people would have their own home to start a family. Also in singapore, your employer has to contribute an extra 16% to a compulsory savings fund that you have to use for housing in addition to your own 20%. so actually you don't need to save a deposit if you buy a cheaper flat as the money in the savings funds would probably be adequate.

I think I would raise my family in London. I would be working very long hours in singapore and it would be a domestic helper raising my child rather than me! also realistically in singapore, i would not be eligible to buy government housing until my british husband got permanent residency (and I would have to buy a private condo, which is of course much more expensive than any property I would purchase in London!). On the other hand I already have permanent residency in the uk. We made the decision to live in the UK when we married and I guess our lives are in the UK now.

FinanceLPlates · 22/08/2022 22:22

On a global level, isn’t there an upside to a decline in population? Human population on planet earth has risen exponentially since the industrial revolution, and we are using up ever more irreplaceable resources, need ever more unsustainably farmed land to feed us all…