In an ideal world, a finding of a research trial would be converted straight away in a change in protocol In the reality , it takes 15-20 years. We have known since 2001 that MEK inhibitors work in reducing plexiform neurofibroma, one of our most terrible manifestations, yet it took 19 years for the drug to be approved and listed.
We know we are not good at processing fat, that we store dietary fats in muscle instead of fat cell. Fat intake will also alter dopamine and GABA and increase likelihood of behaviour disorder. We have papers on that. We know high fat diets alters NF1 gene expression. We already have less neurofibromin circulating.
We have graphs that show that a low fat diet increases force, and now would think that a protocol recommending a low fat diet would be implemented, In the same way, trials in rat shows that restricting dietary proteins will normalise our osteoblast and osteoclast turnover which is too fast. Again, it would make sense to recommend a low protein diet, but nope, again nothing. Those studies aren’t even repeated. There is information which lies forgotten in pubmed since 2006...
Diet is complicated because it takes resources that are not there. It is easy to prescribe a pill. But a dietary program requites follow up, encouragement, dietician, plans, …. Italy does it . The NF1 centre in Naples offer dietary consultations.
Human trials are expensive, take time and it is difficult to find participants you can trust will comply for six months, eating what you tell them to eat and avoiding the forbidden food. Can you imagine a trial in Australia telling participants to drop bacon, burgers, sausages, fish and chips, all fried food, processed food, red meat, processed meats ? For six months?
So they don’t do it. One has been done in 2017 in Italy. Showed success with a Mediterranean high polyphenols diet. Nobody has even tried to repeat it. It is very hard to find participants for trials. They imply a cost for participants. I have to pay transport/petrol and hospital parking fees which are expensive. I have to take time off work.
What I am trying to say, it that there is the science you will find and read, and then you need to understand how the science is done, funded, how a researcher’s career is linked to them being published and therefor how everybody takes the safe route of a trial that won’t be rejected (MEKi, everyone and their dog are doing it, in every continent, wasting millions, since it is the same research repeated again and again). Prepare a diet trial, very high chance of fund refusal. Because you can’t pinpoint a component, a compound, a cellular pathway, because the human body doesn’ work like that. Food works in synergy with the metabolism, the microbiome, ...
The NF1gene doesn't cause tumour. A mutation on the gene means less neurofibromin is circulating and the brakes are off in the cell cycle. IT is go go go. Cell growth, proliferation, turnover... No cellular pathway is simple. There are many players upon which we can act.