The estate agent describes the house as cheap per square foot, that's perhaps not the best description of a house. Good value, value for money etc might be better. There is a further reference to cheap in that (very long) paragraph, albeit this time in reference to mortgages. Perhaps best not to associate the word cheap with the advert at all.
They go on to say that everyone is after an open-plan family kitchen, already implying I won't like the house and will have to do work on it to bring it up to standard. I'm not knowledgeable about extensions, but is there space to extend the house further? Surely the neighbours would object to that. The garden, in my opinion, is too small as it is and extending it would leave you with no garden to speak of.
The description of your house in that massive block of text doesn't seem correct - the implication is that the downstairs loo leads off the utility. Not a problem that it doesn't but I'd be wondering, as a buyer, how the estate agent got it wrong and what else may be wrong.
The first photo is frustrating - I would want to know which house I was viewing.
The second photo, again, it's not clear which house I am meant to be looking at. And after telling me about the rural views, it looks very urban in the background of that photo.
The third photo, would it be worth re-taking that, square on from the front of the house, on a sunny day and at a time of the day that the shadow isn't falling on your driveway?
The little patio in the garden is rather strange. If it's a patio, can you put a table and some chairs on there or something?
I'm on photo 7 and am finally seeing inside the house. There are a lot of outside photos, considering there are only 20 in total and there are 8 external photos.
The living room looks quite cramped in that photo (the fact that the person sitting on the sofa is looking directly at the side of the head of the person sitting in the brown chair, almost as though the person on the sofa isn't part of the conversation). Likewise, the dining room looks like a little passageway with a table shoved in it, though it looks less long and narrow on the plan so maybe it is just taken at an odd angle (in fact, several of the photos seem to have that same weird angle)? With that sort of being separate to the conservatory type room, it feels as though there are no windows in there so needs brightening up for photos/viewings.
The kitchen looks tiny, the surface lower left next to the camera needs a good wipe down, you need a blind up in there and the cable coming from the cooker to the socket looks very taught. Is that the only place you can plug the cooker in? I've never seen a cooker plugged in like that before. I would probably want to knock through in to the utility and possibly the dining room and then have the conservatory type room as the dining area. I'd probably want a door up between the new, bigger kitchen and the conservatory type room as I'm not keen on open-plan kitchen-diners. The kitchen almost looks unused with nothing other than the kettle and toaster on the counter tops. Even the microwave is in the utility suggesting, to me, that the kitchen is too small for use.
The bedrooms generally look quite cramped and not very homely without curtains. The one with the sloping ceiling seems unusual (I would feel a bit claustrophobic I think sleeping under a ceiling that close to my head) and the picture seems in a very unusual placement. Can the room be rearranged, maybe putting a chest of drawers or a dressing table under that part of the room. I can't quite tell what they are on the wall, but on that photo and the one before it almost looks like there is a sort of low dado rail? The bedroom with the mirrored doors looks tiny, and suggests that all you can fit in there is a double bed. I personally don't like mirrored doors like that but I'm guessing they would cost a bit to rip out (might enlarge the room, though) and replace the bed with a single/queen sized bed and a bedside table at least. In the top bedroom, the person sleeping the furthest from the door would seem to have to climb off the end of the bed if they were first up/needed to get up in the night. The little shower room also looks tiny and a bit odd. I know the shower is not directly in the bedroom, but it's not as if there is space to get dried off a little in there. Is there no scope to extend the en-suite in to the storage area behind? The floorplan also makes it look as though the entrance to the shower is another built in wardrobe and the shower comes directly off the bedroom.
The last aerial shot emphasises how small the garden is and how packed together the houses are. I imagine your drive was initially like your neighbours, with grass outside the window? I actually think it looks better as your neighbour has it.
The house looks better on the tour than in the photos, there are some homely touches which make it look less cold but I still don't think it is being shown to its true potential. I think you need to get new photos taken.
I've only had a look at a couple of the other houses you have posted, but I definitely prefer them, sorry. Those houses are built as four beds; pre-extension, your house really was a two bed with a nursery/home office and the size of the living spaces, I feel, reflects that. I think it is probably more comparable to three beds, two reception rooms in your local area rather than four bed with three reception rooms. Before the pandemic, did you view many houses? Were they comparable in size/layout and price?