@Bearnecessity
Britney agreed to the Conservatorship but never wanted her father to be in charge, her most basic wish was ignored and is still being ignored. If the Conservatorship is deemed necessary for whatever reasons Britney's wish for an independent party to be in charge of it should be allowed, imo.
I would agree, this seems hard to understand . The issue is the court must be reviewing it and deeming that what her father is doing is in her best interests based on all the independent assessments.
And that he is best placed to ensure she lives a life that makes her happy but also protects her. That she needs a family member and not just Faceless corporations to do that. The fact she hates him is apparently not as relevant as we think it should be. If not her father, who else would do it? Other than paid corporations? She personally requested her care manager did it originally. Ran the estate element. Which lets face it is batshit. The care manager had no desire to manage her multi million dollar estate and deals. So then it moved to a financial institute.
As it’s clear she is vulnerable to exploitation from people and lacks the ability to decide if someone is acting in her interests or trying to exploit her, you need to extrapolate that to her father also. She’s unable to see if he’s acting in her interests or not and trying to enable her to live a life that makes her happy as far as possible, whilst also protecting her from herself and others. She just friggen hates him.
It’s difficult to comprehend because it’s sealed. No one is saying “look this is her diagnoses, this is how it manifests, this is the prognosis, this is the issues she’s faced, and this is how she was exploited by others before the breakdown”. No one is talking on that score, least of all Britney herself.