Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Do you wish you’d stuck at 2 DC?

58 replies

Goostacean · 12/05/2020 21:00

Just that really. Mulling over a third. Do you wish you’d stuck with two? Ignoring the fact that of course everyone loves their children and (I assume!) you’d not want to get rid of them now, that is.

OP posts:
Goostacean · 12/05/2020 21:00

Oh, and obviously if so- why? Or why not?

OP posts:
HoldMyLobster · 12/05/2020 21:25

Until my youngest was maybe 5 or 6 I wondered what on earth I'd let myself in for, but ever since then I've been delighted to have three.

The first few years was unbelievably hard work.

Lancelottie · 12/05/2020 21:27

God, no!

Guilty, yes. No one can really justify having a third child. But I definitely don’t regret it.

tryingtogrowarosegarden · 12/05/2020 21:32

I don't regret having a third at all, if anything I think it's made me a much as a mum, I always felt like two were in a competition with each other for most attention having a third has meant they get along better with each other and although they still seek my attention, it's much less one-up-manship between them.

CoffeeRunner · 12/05/2020 21:32

No. In the baby days maybe.

I have 2 grown up sons 22 & 19. For 10 years I was more than happy to be a mum of 2. Then something suddenly changed.

I now have my sons (obviously) and a sassy little handful of an 8 year old daughter. Going back to the baby days (nappies, sleepless nights) I guess I questioned my sanity. But now? No. Not for a second. All 3 are so different & so amazing. Couldn’t regret any one of them.

tryingtogrowarosegarden · 12/05/2020 21:33
  • Much better as a mum
lakeswimmer · 12/05/2020 21:38

No - I had three very close together - that was always the plan though. I'm one of three and DH is - it felt like the right number for us.

moanyhole · 12/05/2020 21:40

No. Youngest is the cutest little man. Hard in the early years but definitely worth it

Goostacean · 12/05/2020 21:41

Oh dear, I was hoping you’d all put me off Grin

OP posts:
Vargas · 12/05/2020 21:41

No! I felt like my third completed our family, plus she's amazing. Wink

But of course the years with 3 kids under 5yo are not years that I would like to repeat any time soon...

Goostacean · 12/05/2020 21:43

Would be good to know what some of the age gaps are- we’ve currently got DC1 2y3m and DC2 5mo...

OP posts:
lockdown20 · 12/05/2020 22:01

3 - All 2years apart. Hell.On.Earth until youngest turned 8 and now it’s great, would I have 3 again - No!

Lancelottie · 12/05/2020 22:02

Ah, you want to be put off? Well, our lockdown food bill (at bloody Morrison’s, not Waitrose) this weekend was £190 and they appear to have eaten most of it by Tuesday. Does that help?

Age gaps are two years and then four years here for the accidental extra.

Vargas · 12/05/2020 22:03

I have never met another mum of 3 or more who says she wished they'd stopped at 2. I have met a few mums of 1 or 2 who said they knew they definitely didn't want anymore...so I kind of think you know. Sounds like you should crack on OP Wink.

I knew I was done at 3, whereas DH wanted 4. Guess what, we have 3. No regrets. If I'd been 5 years younger I would probably have had another.

Lancelottie · 12/05/2020 22:04

Oh, and they used to split the nights between them in awake-shifts. The little buggers all got plenty of sleep individually but just never all at the same time. For years.

Vargas · 12/05/2020 22:05

And our food bill is WAY over £190. Might be all the wine.

Poetryinaction · 12/05/2020 22:09

Mine are 6, 4 and 2.
We always wanted 3, and can't imagine life without the third. She is amazing, so easygoing and so so so loved.
Childcare is expensive but otherwise so far so good.
The other two adore her, and she them. They are never bored and there is a lot of laughter. And I get to have a little one around for longer.

frazzledmomof3 · 12/05/2020 22:10

3 under 3 here. Wanted 5 originally. Had my tubes out during section with number 3. He was such a hard baby. Colic reflux. Screamed for the first 5mths of his life. Hes 9mth now. So glad I didnt stop at 2. Hes the most jolly little thing and laughs at everything. Its amazing seeing them all interacting together.

Go for it

Ignore my user name Grin

rednsparkley · 12/05/2020 22:10

I've got 4 - 9, 11, 13, 15 - and tbh I do sometimes wish we had stopped at two. Food bills are immense, school uniform bill is eye-watering, shoe shopping makes me cry and foreign holidays are the price of a family car (our car is fucking massive too)

However, during lockdown (and when we do holiday) they have had plenty of company to choose from, I've not had to entertain them at all and the older they get the easier it gets (ask me again when they are ALL teenagers though Grin )

So some days, yes and some days no is my totally unhelpful answer (sorry)

Goostacean · 15/05/2020 13:43

@frazzledmomof3 3 under 3?? Wow, well done you! I don’t think... in fact yes, that would now be physically impossible for us, which is okay by me. You must be Wonder Woman!

Interesting that people often know when they’re done. I feel like it’s a decision partly of head, partly of heart... Seeing the two boys together is lovely though, so I can just imagine a third cutie adding to our fun. Once they all sleep through...

OP posts:
Drivingdownthe101 · 15/05/2020 13:46

I did at 4.50am this morning when I was downstairs watching peppa pig with the toddler, and the two older ones didn’t get up until 8am! And homeschooling would certainly be easier without him destroying the house at the same time.
But generally no. He’s completed our family.
Age gap 20 months for the first 2, then 3.5 years until the 3rd.

Connie222 · 15/05/2020 13:47

I’m pregnant with my 3rd - but I have big age gaps.

Ds is nearly 18 and Dd is 6.

I wouldn’t have had three close together, I am in awe of those who even have two close in age!

Connie222 · 15/05/2020 13:48

If time was on my side (I’d have had to have stated very young!) I’d have waited until Dd was 12 before a third too Grin

Drivingdownthe101 · 15/05/2020 13:49

I have a friend who had 4 under 3.5. None multiples!

Goostacean · 15/05/2020 14:12

I have a friend who had 4 under 3.5. That would be madness for me! I hope we won’t have the homeschooling challenges in the future that parents are facing now, but who knows... that’s definitely a factor too! The general unpredictability of life.

I know they advise at least 18months between birth and the start of the next pregnancy, so will at least stick to that next time (didn’t quite manage it this time!).

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread