BFF (Nurse- previously 999 ambulance responder) says biggest strain is people not respecting that ambulances are only for those who require lifesaving treatment during the drive to the hospital.
Apparently if you’ve ever waited more than 30-40 mins for an ambulance (and don’t live super rural) you’re in this category.
You are woefully misinformed @WorldsOnFire
As I said up thread I have only called for ambulances for my parents - my father was in his early 90s my mother is in her mid 80s.
I have sat on the floor with each of them for for up to 4 hours on several occasions.
The initial check when you speak to the operator is that they are breathing and if they are conscious. Once that is established the patient is not a high priority. That is completely different from not being an emergency or not needing an ambulance!!
The operator calls back periodically to check they are still breathing.
This is South London not Dartmoor.
So for example my mum waited in agony for almost 4 hours following a fall at home which broke her femur. My father lay on the bedroom floor, delerius and distressed with an acute uti for nearly 3 hours etc.
An ambulance is the only way for either of my parents to get to a and e, and both required paramedic monitoring or intervention en route . And every time the paramedics arrived, they were so apologetic and frustrated by the delays my parents experienced. And not once did they suggest that the other calls were time wasters. They were simply over stretched.