Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

£50 million quids worth of jewels nicked from Tamara Ecclestone

119 replies

LaurieFairyCake · 16/12/2019 17:15

My first and only thought is "I hope the security staff patrolling her compound are fine"

OP posts:
Adviceplease1234 · 16/12/2019 20:07

*conscience!

ChristmasSpiritsOnThRocksPleas · 16/12/2019 20:10

It’s not like they’re going to be family heirlooms. They must be insured and so easily replaced. In their shoes is he grateful that the burglary was successful because it meant that no one was hurt.

MerryGrinch · 16/12/2019 20:14

Will the insurance pay out given she posted on Instagram that she was on holiday?

BaubleTheLumpOfCoal · 16/12/2019 20:17

Immediately upon reading it I thought 'inside job.'

There's no way outsider burglars are going to get around a 57 room mansion, avoiding security and finding a hidden safe.

ooooohbetty · 16/12/2019 20:21

She goes on holiday at least once a month or so it seems from her instagram and always tells people they are away. Definitely and inside job but the poor security men from that street are in big trouble even if they had nothing to do with it.

poorbuthappy · 16/12/2019 20:21

I've just unfollowed 2 family members who have decided that as she's rich she doesn't deserve any sympathy as a victim of crime.
That's a slippery slope and I think it's a
Bloody horrible thing to say.

patchworkpatty · 16/12/2019 20:25

I read it in the EveningStandard on the way home.. the next page was the article about the 'homeless Christmas appeal' ...
no one got hurt , I really can't get too misty eyed about someone spending that amount of money on jewellery. Unearned wealth makes it all the more distasteful.

donquixotedelamancha · 16/12/2019 20:26

I’m not sure how in good conscious you could own jewellery worth that much.

Indeed. On a moral level I'm not sure whether owning £50 million in jewels is better than nicking £50 million in jewels. Both seem like pretty terrible life choices to me.

Soontobe60 · 16/12/2019 20:34

I'm with those who think spending that amount of jewellery is obscene, on a par with transfer fees of top footballers, and other equally obscene amounts of money.
If I had my house broken into and my jewellery stolen I'd expect the same service from th EP olive as she got, but I doubt I'd get it. And before you ask, I've got 1 plain wedding ring, a diamond eternity ring worth about £500, 3 silver bracelets, and a silver necklace.

Elderflower14 · 16/12/2019 20:39

Wonder if the insurance will pay out... She broadcast on sm that she was on holiday!

Dapplegrey · 16/12/2019 20:40

How much jewellery can someone own before it becomes obscene?
Jewels worth £1million? £100,000?
As a pp said, the proceeds of a few thousand pounds worth of jewellery could do good.

poorbuthappy · 16/12/2019 20:44

I'm of the opinion that people can spend their money on what they want (legal obv)

VenusClapTrap · 16/12/2019 20:53

Thanks, @FlibbertyGiblets 😊

SebandAlice · 16/12/2019 20:53

@TwattyMcTwatface

I would love you to do an AMA

Hihellohi · 16/12/2019 20:54

TBH all of you saying how much good it could do have no idea what she does for charity in private. Her money, her choice what she spends it on.
It’s not nice for anyone’s home to be burgled, it’s a horrible invasion of privacy.

And like a PP said, I’d also like to know (just coz I’m nosy and I like sparkly things) what kind of stuff they keep in the banks if this is what is kept at home.

donquixotedelamancha · 16/12/2019 20:56

I'm of the opinion that people can spend their money on what they want

Of course they can. Others are equally free to judge the fuck out of them for being selfish and shallow.

Hihellohi · 16/12/2019 21:01

Do you not buy anything nice then?

donquixotedelamancha · 16/12/2019 21:01

TBH all of you saying how much good it could do have no idea what she does for charity in private.

He sat down opposite the treasury and observed how the crowd put money into the treasury. Many rich people put in large sums. A poor widow also came and put in two small coins worth a few cents. Calling his disciples to himself, he said to them, 'Amen, I say to you, this poor widow put in more than all the other contributors to the treasury. For they have all contributed from their surplus wealth, but she, from her poverty, has contributed all she had, her whole livelihood.

Lulualla · 16/12/2019 21:01

I'm a jeweller. I'm not loaded like them but if you're talking percentages, then I probably have a jewellery collection equalling a similarly.percentage of the money in my back as her.
I love jewellery. I love everything about it. And I love that when I'm gone, it will still be here and be worn by m descendants (I hope). If I had her wealth, I'd spend 50 million or more on jewellery too.

donquixotedelamancha · 16/12/2019 21:09

Do you not buy anything nice then?

Not really, no; but that's not the point. People can, of course, buy nice things but that level of unearned excess is something different.

Hihellohi · 16/12/2019 21:13

Unearned excess. Lol. Her dad has given it to her and he has every right to!!

The virtue signalling on this thread is unreal.

DarkDarkNight · 16/12/2019 21:14

I had a serious case of deja vu when I heard this today. Has a similar jewel theft happened before to her or her Sister?

Like the Kim Kardashian theft I think the ultra rich need to take a step away from Social Media and consider how much information they are putting out there.

I also thought how obscene to have jewellery worth that much. Yes it’s her money, but there comes a point when you’re just buying for the sake of it

saraclara · 16/12/2019 21:17

Theoretically people can spend what they like on whatever they like, if they can afford it.

In reality, I don't spend anything like what I could spend on unnecessary stuff. Because it feels wrong. I don't need to spend that much on the thing that's not vital to my life. And the various projects I'm involved with here and abroad have brought home to me how many people are in need and how a small amount of money used wisely can transform people's lives.

Anyway, this isn't intended to be a pious post. But I do genuinely think that, while logically, someone's money is theirs to do with as they like, owning £50m worth of jewellery is immoral in some sense.

SebandAlice · 16/12/2019 21:19

I have sympathy that they were broken into but I do think the amount they flaunt their wealth is obscene.

Bernie has spent most of his life trying to avoid paying tax in the UK and when he sold F1 immediately transferred the billions off shore. Think of that next time you see tax automatically deducted from your pay check.

www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/motorsport/formulaone/10791537/Bernie-Ecclestone-accused-of-biggest-ever-personal-tax-dodge.html

noblegiraffe · 16/12/2019 21:21

I think if she has £50 million in jewellery lying around then advertising that she’s on holiday on social media is unlikely to mean that her house is empty and unprotected in the same way it might if we were on holiday?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread