Do you question why bipolar disorder and eupd are treated so differently by a majority (in my experience) of mental health professionals? I was diagnosed with psychotic depression and bipolar disorder and treated as though it was an illness, although I was sectioned constantly.
I moved to another health district, clashed with new psychiatrist and was labelled with 'bpd' (as it was called in the 90s), and as a result of that diagnosis I was treated as manipulative and not worth helping. I got really sadistic treatment.
move on again, return to bipolar diagnosis and moral judgement disappears. My treatment is far from perfect but I am not mistrusted and blamed.
Psychiatry is is no way scientific and precise.. You are diagnosed by the drugs that work for you as much as by your cluster of symptoms. EUPD as some common features with bipolar disorder. However there are currently no drugs marketed for personality disorders. When they arrive (by accident because psychiatric conditions other than depression are not a big money spinner), psychiatrists will begin to treat EUPD patients as ill rather than attention seeking and manipulative individuals.
Having been in the system since a teenager and watching the advent of care in the community while on many sections, I have observed the contradictions in the 2 diagnoses and also the sexism displayed in the diagnosis of EUPD.
Why do you think EUPD is related to ND than to other mental illnesses?
It is amazing how little is known about mental dysfunctions, apart from their preponderance in certain families and the multiple dna combinations that might with a level of trauma ignite the condition various and inexact conditions.
and since ASD and ADHD are common in families also containing individuals suffering from bipolar and possibly schizophrenia, I do not understand the separation of ND from mental illness, the categories seemed arbitrary and more related to social mores and absence of input from pharmaceutical companies, than of educated scientific distinction.