Thank you for the AMA, @@whyhere
My question is:
Why in this day and age are so many church building still deeply unsuitable to take young children to? I have a toddler and would love to go to regular Sunday morning services, but there’s no church in easy reach of us that has a facility for young children.
When I was little, my parents took me to a church that had what was called a “quieting room” at the side. That room meant they never missed a service - they could always whisk me away if I was having a cry, or a little toddler tantrum. The room had a nice big window so parents could still see everything, and there was a wall speaker in the room linked to the microphone at the lectern, so they could hear the sermon etc. This was in the 1980s, in a small church in a run-down area, so it wasn’t some fancy high-end innovation! Apparently these days the only churches with child-friendly facilities are the ones with sought-after church schools attached, and even those aren’t always suitable for babies and toddlers.
Lack of appropriate facilities means that people with young children basically have to stop going to church. And once we’ve stopped, the odds of us starting again are fairly low. Effectively excluding young families from worship is almost certainly a pretty big contributor overall in dwindling congregations.
It’s all well and good saying “you can watch the service live-streamed on Facebook” but most churchgoers want to actually go to church to be around other people and part of a faith community. I certainly do. (I don’t use Facebook either.) So why not make it easier for parents of young children to attend church, to be part of something bigger, and to bring their children up in a community of faith - simply by ensuring churches have at least one place they can retreat to if their young child is behaving like a young child tends to? A quieting room isn’t a new idea. It just doesn’t seem to be something the central church thinks is important.