Is Cephalopelvic disproportion an actual thing? I was told by the doctors after dc1 that I'd probably never manage to give birth to a term baby because my pelvis is too flat. The community midwives with dc2 told me that "different baby, different labour" etc etc and of course so many people I know have trotted out "your body won't grow a baby it can't birth" etc.
Dc1 started back to back but rotated during labour into what was described as an optimal position. I pushed, I changed position, they tried forceps and he never moved lower than mid pelvis. Was eventually delivered by emcs.
Dc2 went into labour ahead of my elective date. Thought she was back to back due to location of pain. Turns out she was optimally positioned from the start, I was just contracting in my back/pelvis which the consultant said was a further indication of my rubbish pelvis. Delivered by emcs again.
Also do you think the language of birth helps contribute to the way women feel about it? With my first, everything had failure plastered all over it. Failed forceps, failure to descend, failed vaginal birth...I had a bit of breakdown (various factors including losing consciousness on the operating table for a bit, dc1 needing nicu) and couldn't accept what happened as giving birth. Even now, 5 years later and another baby, I don't consider myself to have given birth because it was made so clear to me in those first few days that I'd failed ds.