I usually hate these AMAs but have been following this one with interest.
I live in an area of the country with a high traveller population - both permanent traveller sites and seemingly a popular part of the country for travellers to stop.
In my experience, there are 4 kinds of travellers:
- The settled travellers. They live in houses, they work, children go to the local schools, they are ordinary members of the local community. Generally locally, the ones to have settled are now the grandparent generation. You wouldn't know their children and grandchildren were travellers although their surnames are a give away (like OP mentioned, there's a small number of large family groups).
- Those who travel for business - those who travel with the circus and the fairs. They arrive, set up, work long hours (preparing, doing their thing, dismantling everything again) and then move on. There is zero evidence they've been there (besides the mess the locals leave behind after visiting the attraction) and there's never any trouble - obviously, or the council would never let them back the following year.
- The bad ones. The ones who make the stereotype then blow it out of the water. Over the last decade, locally there has been horrific assaults committed by travellers (one that springs to mind is a 90+ year old war veteran who was burgled in his home and left for dead after being attacked by claw hammer), murder (interestingly between two traveller families rather than travellers and non travellers), crime (it's estimated that crime committed by travellers in the county amounts to over £2 million a year), they commit animal cruelty (I work in animal care and deal with the abused and neglected dogs that they leave behind, the unvaccinated puppies with parvovirus and distemper that are dumped) they cause unnecessary destruction and mess when they pitch up illegally (it cost £20k to get the local park and ride back up and running after a recent bunch showed up). These are the stories we hear about. These are the travellers who set the stereotypes that people believe. These stereotypes fit some travellers living on illegal camps and permanent sites locally.
- The rest - the travellers who live largely under the radar and go unnoticed. They turn up somewhere (an official site or occasionally you see them spend a few days in a layby or public car park), they live their life, they pack up and move on. No fuss, no drama, no damage, no mess. There's one family in particular who pitch up at the end of a country lane (dead end) near where I live, a few times a year - it's on one of my running and cycling routes. They're friendly, chatty, hospitable (I'm always asked if I need my water bottles refilled or a snack or anything!) and I'm always conscious that I'm effectively running/cycling through the middle of their living room!
To me, it seems such a shame that #1 #2 and #4 constantly have to live in the shadow of #3, especially in 2018 when we're more accepting of minority groups than ever.
Thank you for making their thread OP, and seeing it through, despite the prejudices that you have received.
My question to you - if you could travel anywhere in the world - where would you go?