I am a stay at home mum of four... lol... and I had a bunch of men telling me I cannot be a real feminist cause I am not working full time
ConfusedWife. I had that a couple of times from men and it really baffled me because yes, if women have been fighting so long to get the same opportunities as men it seems anti-feminist to squander it.
But then I realised that I was measuring my self worth against the gold standard for men. And that was a type of internalised patriarchy itself.
So I thought about it hard, took inspiration from my feminist SAH Mum and came to a different conclusion:
The aims of feminism are twofold: 1) to give women and girls the same opportunity as men. And I don’t just mean the legal opportunity but actual real opportunity, in terms of education, encouragement, expectations and social freedoms.
But at the same time...
- to raise the status and value accorded to what has traditionally been seen as women’s work. Having empathy, the mental load, housework, bringing up children these are incredibly important things that the human race (and the economic system) would crumble to pieces without. Rewrite history to reflect the important part that women have played and the challenges they faced. One of the most beautiful things about Mumsnet is that we come from various walks of life with different experiences but we all love our kids and spend a lot of time worrying about what’s best for them.
That to me is fucking amazing. So yes, for me, you can be a SAHM feminist so long as you recognise your worth and the importance of what you’re doing.
As Bertrand says monetary dependence is a problem which is why so many MNers urge SAHMs to have the legal protection afforded by marriage.