With this being a relatively new Ninja offering, I was slightly apprehensive that it would be complex to get to grips with. Luckily, I was quickly proven wrong—in fact, it was surprisingly easy to use.
To operate the intuitive control panel, first you need to press the 'on' button. Then, if you're cooking just one portion, select '1' or '2' to choose your basket, use the dial to switch between the six presets—air fry, max crisp, roast, reheat, bake, or dehydrate—before pressing the temperature and timing buttons and adjusting the dial to get your desired settings. Honestly, once you've read the instructions and used it once or twice, it's an absolute doddle to operate.
If you're cooking in both baskets simultaneously, it's a very similar process, but you just need to press the 'Double Stack Pro' button before following the steps outlined above for one basket. Then, for the second basket, you can either press 'match', which applies the same settings to both baskets, or you can manually input different settings,. So, even if you're roasting at 180°C in one basket and air frying at 200°C in the other, you can cook both portions at the same time.
What's more, if your dishes have different cooking times, you can press the 'sync' button, so the two baskets finish cooking at the same time. I found this setting very useful, especially when preparing meat in one drawer and veg in another.
As with most Ninja air fryers, it doesn't have any settings specifically tailored to different food types (e.g chips, frozen food, chicken, vegetables), like you often get with models from other brands. When I was an air fryer novice, I found these settings really useful to have as they took the guesswork out of choosing temperatures/timings. However, it's not a huge issue, as the Ninja comes with a handy recipe book and a removable sticker with timings for popular dishes. Plus, I liked how clean the interface looks without a load of extra buttons.
Related: The best slow cookers for winter feasts
Ninja Double Stack Air Fryer SL400UK performance: how were the results?