"Misandry is the root of all trans fear. Men’s fear of other men. Women’s fear of all men."

Translates as:
"Whenever I say so"

For argument's sake I'd guess.

All BaileyChoppingNorthernHowseThegoodnewsGretel's "arguments" have been answered/refuted/debunked at various times on myriad threads more than once. Yet he keeps regurgitating them.
He doesn't understand the SCJ.
He doesn't understand "proportionality" despite it being his favourite word.
Or how single sex spaces are created and justified.
He just likes arguing with women.

I find him so mind-numbingly boring I skip over his posts now.

I think you skipped the Lacksie incarnation.

Either way, the talking points are the same, as is the "asked and answered" diversion from any difficult questions.

I gotta be honest here. I largely enjoy omniuserid's posts. I love the way that an argument is advanced and then defeated. Then a new argument is advanced which is defeated. And again and again and again. The final argument can only be "You're all nasty blue meanies and I hate you."

Ah. Tbh I thought Lacksie might be A Flying Lawyer.
Either way, I definitely haven't covered ALL Chopping's various aliases on here.

I don't think Chopping and Lacksie are the same person, if only because their ideas of what a trans person is don't mesh together.

With Lacksie it seems to be "they just know" right from being a baby, they don't need to know about stereotypes or sex characteristics, and it's to do with something in the brain which we haven't really discovered yet. It's not made clear what "girl" and "boy" actually amount to.

With Chopping and aliases it's about feeling you are typical of, or more like the opposite sex in various unspecified ways, then turning yourself into a facsimile of the opposite sex with hormones and surgery, which is supposed to count as being the opposite sex for social purposes. "Girl" definitely amounts to being girly ( or thinking that you are).

I know. I’d be interested to know whether he refrains from smiling, celebratory drinks, high fives and saying ‘YES!’ in cheerful tones when Everton wins in order to spare their opponents’ feelings or whether he thinks it’s only GC women who should decorously exercise restraint at all times.

I’ll have you know that we Everton fans rarely have reason to celebrate.

😂😂😂😂 MNHQ we need that laugh emoji

For a long time pubs usually had the women’s loos further away from the bars than the men’s, I think because originally they didn’t have women’s loos at all (if a woman visited her local she was assumed to go home for a pee) & so they were an afterthought.

I have nevertheless managed never to invade the gents!

One of the many claimants to the title "the oldest pub in England", back in the eighties, had a gents that opened off the bar and a ladies that was out through a courtyard, up a flight of stairs, and along to the far end of an ill-lit balcony.

They'll have had to change that since for accessibility reasons, but that's how it was back then.

I don't suppose many of the Laydeez would be keen on that! Nobody would see their brave gesture of going for a piss in the wrong place.