Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Girls Using Walking Sticks

890 replies

Arran2024 · 08/07/2025 18:57

I saw a post about this on X this morning. Apparently it is a trend.

Anyway, I went into town this afternoon and sure enough, I saw a number of young women with walking sticks. None of them looked like they were leaning hard on their stick, just kind of walking along like it was a big umbrella.

Is anyone else seeing this?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Freda69 · Yesterday 17:02

NameChange0101010101 · Yesterday 12:46

This thread has depressed me.

I live with an energy limiting condition (yes, diagnosed, no i haven't invented it) and have recently discovered the difference mobility aids can make to my life.

I'm struggling with shame, what people will think of they see me get out my wheelchair and walk a bit, etc.

Apparently most people will be wondering if I'm a big fake. So that's nice.

I don't enjoy being dependent on my husband. Its really difficult being in a wheelchair because even for something as simple a wanting to read a poster, you need to all your carer to turn you round or move you a little. People not in a wheel chair just take a step to the side. Sometimes I feel like I'm asking too much.

I've been on holiday and my husband drove me to the beach and helped me down the steps so I could have a careful 10 minutes time playing in the sea. I then had to rest for 15 minutes before struggling back up to the car park. I've been knackered for 2 days. If we need to go out today, I'll need the wheelchair to avoid making myself worse.

I'm feeling low today. I'm putting on weight and there's FA I can do about it as moving about too much leaves me bed bound for days. This isn't me, is not the person I used to be - chubby and dependent. I used to be fit and strong 💪

So threads like this, speculating on other people's disability really get me down.

I get that if there's a trend it's useful to look into that and find out why, not not everyone here is doing that, some are clearly just here to judge. And that's shitty.

I agree - I’m finding all these judgemental comments on here quite upsetting.
I have a lupus, plus hip replacements, fibromyalgia diagnosed by a rheumatologist and I’m deaf. I’ve been in a wheelchair, on crutches and had to use lifts sometimes. I’ve got a sunflower lanyard, a badge to ask people to offer me a seat on the tube and a blue badge - I avoid using them if I don’t need them.
But to most people I look fine and some days I am fine, but my life is very restricted since I became ill.
If these youngsters need sticks or other aids, they’re not hurting anyone else, so maybe we should just ‘be kind’ and stop being so horribly prejudiced about disabilities.

CassandraWebb · Yesterday 18:07

blunderdul · Yesterday 12:52

Oh yes that’s definitely true. I just want to point out I don’t assume anyone in a wheelchair or using walking aids is faking their disability. I may have come across badly in this thread but that is of my own doing, I’m not the best at articulating. I did example one person because that one persons presentation doesn’t add up, for me anyway. I don’t judge everyone with a stick or chair based on one person but I did judge that one person based on what they have shown of themselves.

I remember many years ago I had some heart scans done and when I met with the cardiologist for my results he told me I don’t have a heart problem. He was so surprised at my relief and said you would be amazed how many people are not happy to be told their heart is fine. I guess some people just want to have something wrong with them, for whatever reason and those people will always make the ‘worst’ of their situation.

Perhaps. But when you know something isn't right with your body you are desperate for an answer that will help you make sense of it and help you learn how best to manage the symptoms you are struggling with. Getting a diagnosis after 20 years of being ill was a very happy moment for me. Not because I wanted to be ill. And certainly not because I wanted to have a serious and life threatening neuro-muscular junction disorder. But because I could finally make sense of all my struggles and even more importantly I could learn how to manage my symptoms both through medication and pacing.
Later came the sadness that I haven't responded well to the treatments that put some people in remission, but yes the primary initial emotion was relief. Anyone who doesn't understand that clearly hasn't spent decades battling disabling symptoms without a diagnosis

blunderdul · Yesterday 18:16

CassandraWebb · Yesterday 18:07

Perhaps. But when you know something isn't right with your body you are desperate for an answer that will help you make sense of it and help you learn how best to manage the symptoms you are struggling with. Getting a diagnosis after 20 years of being ill was a very happy moment for me. Not because I wanted to be ill. And certainly not because I wanted to have a serious and life threatening neuro-muscular junction disorder. But because I could finally make sense of all my struggles and even more importantly I could learn how to manage my symptoms both through medication and pacing.
Later came the sadness that I haven't responded well to the treatments that put some people in remission, but yes the primary initial emotion was relief. Anyone who doesn't understand that clearly hasn't spent decades battling disabling symptoms without a diagnosis

But I wasn’t talking about people being relived to find their answer, it was about people being disappointed to be told they were ok. It’s not the same.

backformoreofthesame · Yesterday 18:22

Surely large numbers of girls pretending that they are in some way disabled will do the disabled no good in the long run ?

and the idea that suddenly we have a lot of seriously ill young women - but not older women , not males, and not with an increase in an diagnoses , does suggest fashion or social contagion

AmateurNoun · Yesterday 19:04

backformoreofthesame · Yesterday 18:22

Surely large numbers of girls pretending that they are in some way disabled will do the disabled no good in the long run ?

and the idea that suddenly we have a lot of seriously ill young women - but not older women , not males, and not with an increase in an diagnoses , does suggest fashion or social contagion

Yes exactly. If this is happening it will have a very serious impact on the credibility of people who are genuinely disabled and their ability to convince others to make accommodations that they need.

And to all the people who are saying that this thread is hurtful and we should not be asking questions because it makes people with genuine disabilities feel bad - did you have the same qualms when people started saying that there might be a gender dysphoria social contagion? Did you worry about how the people who had genuine gender dysphoria and how it might make them feel? Or did you think that it was too significant and too harmful to ignore?

CassandraWebb · Yesterday 19:08

blunderdul · Yesterday 18:16

But I wasn’t talking about people being relived to find their answer, it was about people being disappointed to be told they were ok. It’s not the same.

It kind of is though. On that long journey I had various tests for various conditions and I did find it hard when they came back negative as I wanted answers.

NameChange0101010101 · Yesterday 19:15

blunderdul · Yesterday 18:16

But I wasn’t talking about people being relived to find their answer, it was about people being disappointed to be told they were ok. It’s not the same.

Its not the same.

But, crucially, you don't know which of these the consultant was talking about when they told you some people seem disappointed they haven't got any diagnosis.

Neither you, nor the consultant can speak to the contents of those patients minds. Its a hell of an assumption. And now its been pointed out that you're making it, you're trying to weasel out of it by saying 'of course, I only meant the people in x group not y'. You have no way of knowing, neither does the consultant, which group the people you were casually talking about were actually in.

Its relevant because its a massive, ableist assumption that harms genuinely sick people and instead of acknowledging that, you're doubling down. Which is frustrating.

NameChange0101010101 · Yesterday 19:27

RoyalCorgi · Yesterday 16:38

There's no test.

That's the problem, isn't it? The alternative to treating all young women as if their symptoms are psychosomatic (which I think is what you're suggesting I am doing, or that Stock is doing) is to treat them all as if they have a genuine illness. Which is also problematic, particularly if it means that as a society we have to fork out large amounts in benefit payments.

This is a really ignorant post.

You cannot self diagnose your way into PIP or any other benefits. Its a long difficult road of trying to collate enough evidence of how your disability affects you which is very difficult if it is fluctuating, and which n all probability will be denied first time as most pip claims are.

You don't just write 'I've decided I've got POTS, where's my cheque? And off you go, quids in! FFS! I have, so far, not even been able to gather enough evidence for a blue badge, which is a much lower threshold. But I'm too sick to work.

This was my point upthread. Yes, we should investigate this phenomena of young women identifying as disabled if it is genuinely happening, not least to make sure they are enabled to live their lives to the full, but at the same time can we please take care to not make peoples lives, who are living with genuine disabilities, harder than they need to be?

For some readers it seems to be a very short hop from 'some people are using walking sticks when they have no need' to 'the country can't afford all these fraudulent benefits claims' - one doesn't mean the other is happening!

PollyNomial · Yesterday 19:31

Igneococcus · Yesterday 09:25

If this is all the case then you should have no problem with this being looked into properly. The outcome would be that these are all genuine cases. The same way as scientists are looking into the truly disturbing increase in cancer in young people. Or if there is a group of kids who are not physically sick but use sticks for whatever other reason this would actually point to other problems that need addressing.

Where did you pick up that cancer in young people was increasing alarmingly? Not heard that before.

blunderdul · Yesterday 19:39

CassandraWebb · Yesterday 19:08

It kind of is though. On that long journey I had various tests for various conditions and I did find it hard when they came back negative as I wanted answers.

But you did have something wrong. These people did not.

borntobequiet · Yesterday 20:25

Mind you, “young” seems to mean under fifty.

PatienceTried · Yesterday 20:31

TheMemoryOfLiseYates · 08/07/2025 19:38

I had to start using a walking stick in the last 2 years due to an injury leading to a diagnosed disability (not POTS). I do need to lean on it heavily after just a few minutes of standing and walking. Being ‘too young’ to need a mobility aid, I’ve had a few encounters with disbelieving people when in public. Other young people I know who have need of a stick are afraid to use one because of this recent stereotype.

This is the worst consequence of trends. The people most in need suffer.

NotBadConsidering · Yesterday 21:58

NameChange0101010101 · Yesterday 13:46

I don't know if this is how you intended it, but it sounds like you're saying FND is 'all in the mind'.

I don't believe that is the case. Its a neurological condition where the nerve signals are not being transmitted properly - so you could have limbs which are, in themselves, fine, but they don't work because of a network issue between the limb and the brain.

The 'functional' means a change in the function of a body part, rather than in its structure, ie looks fine but doesn't work.

Maybe that's what you meant? Its not clear from your post. You seem to be saying that the 'functional' part means there's no actual, real problem, and I don't believe that's the case.

Yes, your description is exactly what FND is. And it is also all in the mind. It’s not an actual issue with nerve signalling. There are no defective nerves. It’s a level of consciousness that it impacting the processing of those signals. This can be objectively demonstrated in people with FND. Nerve conduction tests can show the nerves are working perfectly fine. In someone who says they are blind, they can undergo a test called ERG which demonstrates perfectly good signals reaching their brain from their eyes. An EEG can be done during supposed seizure activity and demonstrate clearly that they are pseudo-seizures.

The “signalling” description you use is just how to help people with FND understand and accept their condition. It makes sense. It helps people make sense. The anxious brain gives us gut symptoms. In extreme situations there is fight/flight, a physiological response to trauma, and so on. When it is explained that the higher brain can impact the body through various mechanisms it helps people accept and understand their condition. But there is no actual problem with the nerves; not only can no problem with nerves be demonstrated, it can be demonstrated that nerves are functioning normally, from an objective sense.

What they experience is real, but there is still no physical problem. “Functional” means their body functions are affected, but it’s also a euphemism for “no actual neurological disease”.

NotBadConsidering · Yesterday 22:10

SodOffbacktoaibu · Yesterday 16:31

I work in a university and have still never seen this 'phenomenon' personally.

Why would you assume FND for all these people @NotBadConsidering ? Many people with MEcfs have been misdiagnosed with fND I believe. So that's complicated to untangle too.

@RoyalCorgi MEcfs is a real disorder that is massively underfunded in research. People with it have suffered medical negligence and scandalous 'treatment' that caused and continues to cause people harm. It is really hard to get a diagnosis beyond a GP and many GPs are badly informed on MEcfs. Some NHS trusts have no MEcfs service at all or no consultants. This being the case, how can anyone point out that symptoms aren't rooted in real bodily disorders? If some are faking as you suggest as part of some social contagion, how on earth is this not going to damage people who have genuine illnesses and disabilities?

So you're saying that some people saying they have MEcfs or fibromyalgia or long covid or POTS or Heds (all of which often comes together/overlap) have real symptoms but it is psychosomatic? But people who actually have these conditions have also been told it is psychosomatic by the medical profession (disproved and good indicators now via the decodeME research). So are we to treat everyone who has such an illness as a youngster as someone in a trend feigning the illness or do we believe people? There's no test.

As someone up thread said, by all means carry out legitimate research on social contagion but naming individuals and having yet more anti disability narrative in the press is really damaging for very vulnerable people.

I found Stock's article really disappointing and concerning. A breezy dismissal and mean spirited. I might not like the way identity politics has inveigled it's way into this area too. I'm mid fifties and do not enjoy naval gazing and endless tiktok style attention seeking, but I am very concerned about this narrative around young women .. I think it is not the take I would want to see from older feminists.

Why would you assume FND for all these people ? Many people with MEcfs have been misdiagnosed with fND I believe. So that's complicated to untangle too.

Have they though? Been misdiagnosed? Or have the ones who won’t accept their FND diagnosis gone on TikTok and said they “finally found a doctor” who was willing to call it something else?

Because I have seen this many, many times. People who have been extensively investigated, seen subspecialists in hospital, even had genetic testing, and shown their condition is functional who won’t accept it who then go and seek out Dr Quack who is renowned among certain patient groups to be “the only one who understands us” who gives them a diagnosis of ME/CFS/POTS/MAS/EDS etc (delete/include as applicable).

It’s far more likely for it to be this way round rather that the other. People in this situation tell everyone about it, because it’s more engaging to followers to use the “NHS let me down” trope. You are far less likely to hear of all the times people accept their FND diagnosis, mainly because it’s underdiagnosed and also because it’s harder to discuss. I think it’s great when people do.

This was a good article on it last year that shows how extreme the symptoms can be:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2x13k170do

Megan Dixon looking slightly to the left, she has a white sheet behind her, she has long blonde hair, with a nose ring. She has a bare shoulder.

FND: 'I went into hospital for four days and came out two years later'

After being told she would never move again, Megan Dixon is preparing for an independent life.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2x13k170do

underthecokesign · Yesterday 22:19

Freda69 · Yesterday 17:02

I agree - I’m finding all these judgemental comments on here quite upsetting.
I have a lupus, plus hip replacements, fibromyalgia diagnosed by a rheumatologist and I’m deaf. I’ve been in a wheelchair, on crutches and had to use lifts sometimes. I’ve got a sunflower lanyard, a badge to ask people to offer me a seat on the tube and a blue badge - I avoid using them if I don’t need them.
But to most people I look fine and some days I am fine, but my life is very restricted since I became ill.
If these youngsters need sticks or other aids, they’re not hurting anyone else, so maybe we should just ‘be kind’ and stop being so horribly prejudiced about disabilities.

Well said. 👏

NameChange0101010101 · Yesterday 22:20

NotBadConsidering · Yesterday 21:58

Yes, your description is exactly what FND is. And it is also all in the mind. It’s not an actual issue with nerve signalling. There are no defective nerves. It’s a level of consciousness that it impacting the processing of those signals. This can be objectively demonstrated in people with FND. Nerve conduction tests can show the nerves are working perfectly fine. In someone who says they are blind, they can undergo a test called ERG which demonstrates perfectly good signals reaching their brain from their eyes. An EEG can be done during supposed seizure activity and demonstrate clearly that they are pseudo-seizures.

The “signalling” description you use is just how to help people with FND understand and accept their condition. It makes sense. It helps people make sense. The anxious brain gives us gut symptoms. In extreme situations there is fight/flight, a physiological response to trauma, and so on. When it is explained that the higher brain can impact the body through various mechanisms it helps people accept and understand their condition. But there is no actual problem with the nerves; not only can no problem with nerves be demonstrated, it can be demonstrated that nerves are functioning normally, from an objective sense.

What they experience is real, but there is still no physical problem. “Functional” means their body functions are affected, but it’s also a euphemism for “no actual neurological disease”.

So its a brain issue rather than a nerve one?

The NHS literature i had (re a friends child, not myself) referred to "We know that the symptoms of FND happen because there’s a problem with how the brain is sending and receiving messages to itself and other parts of the body" - which i guess must be quite dumbed down!

My point though was that there is something real that is wrong - just like depression is a real thing.. I felt that the post I was responding to did not make that clear in fact was suggesting the opposite.

SodOffbacktoaibu · Yesterday 22:43

Yes, people have been misdiagnosed with FND.
@NotBadConsidering .

https://meassociation.org.uk/medical-matters/items/functional-neurological-disorder/

You're coming at this from a very different experience to me and I don't recognise it. We will have to agree to disagree. I don't see the evidence for what you claim.

Treatment for FND if you actually have MECFS is dangerous. Graded exercise therapy is not recommended for people with MEcfs and was removed from the nice guidelines.

Functional Neurological Disorder - The ME Association

As you probably know, ME/CFS has been classified by the […]

https://meassociation.org.uk/medical-matters/items/functional-neurological-disorder

NotBadConsidering · Yesterday 22:45

NameChange0101010101 · Yesterday 22:20

So its a brain issue rather than a nerve one?

The NHS literature i had (re a friends child, not myself) referred to "We know that the symptoms of FND happen because there’s a problem with how the brain is sending and receiving messages to itself and other parts of the body" - which i guess must be quite dumbed down!

My point though was that there is something real that is wrong - just like depression is a real thing.. I felt that the post I was responding to did not make that clear in fact was suggesting the opposite.

Yes it’s a higher brain issue, a psychiatric issue. There is no physical issue with the brain as far as our understanding of mental health disorders go. We don’t fully understand things like dissociation, how the higher brain/consciousness responds/is impacted by such things.

What you describe about “sending/receiving messages” is to help people get their heads around it, to give them something tangible to describe their condition. Because giving people with FND something tangible and reinforce of the realness of the condition from treating healthcare professionals is how progress towards treatment is made. Saying “it’s all in your mind” has been shown to be the worst way of helping people with FND, it just leads to resistance. It’s important patients believe that their treating doctor/team don’t just think “it’s all in their head” because then they can’t move forward with steps to get better.

For example with pseudo-seizures, there’s no need to say during one “stop lying on the floor shaking! You’re just making it up!” Instead it’s a case of letting it happen but not have everyone clamouring round calling an ambulance/giving drugs/calling the resus team in hospital etc and reducing the stress around such events. With physical leg issues, you can’t just say “you can walk perfectly fine!” Instead they do need physio, rehabilitation etc, like the young woman in the article above whose legs are now deformed as a result.

In many ways CFS/MAS/POTS/EDS diagnoses do actually allow this to happen; once people get their “label” as such, they can then “move on” and focus on treatments, many of which involve the same things. I suspect it’s common in medicine to not fight such diagnoses because is it worth it if the patient is getting physio, rehab, feeling happier and improving?

But as mentioned there are some who don’t ever seem happy at being told things are getting better. Hard to help people in those situations.

NotBadConsidering · Yesterday 22:56

SodOffbacktoaibu · Yesterday 22:43

Yes, people have been misdiagnosed with FND.
@NotBadConsidering .

https://meassociation.org.uk/medical-matters/items/functional-neurological-disorder/

You're coming at this from a very different experience to me and I don't recognise it. We will have to agree to disagree. I don't see the evidence for what you claim.

Treatment for FND if you actually have MECFS is dangerous. Graded exercise therapy is not recommended for people with MEcfs and was removed from the nice guidelines.

No I am not coming at it from a different experience. There will be people - unsurprisingly from the ME community - who think they were misdiagnosed as FND. And there will be people the other way round who think the opposite. I think you’re more likely to hear from the former than the latter.

Graded exercise is not “dangerous” at all. Its removal from ME/CFS guidelines was controversial at the time and remains so. The fact that many specialists think it should still be a treatment component shows it isn’t “dangerous” in a true health way, only “dangerous” to the philosophy of the condition.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jul/11/chronic-fatigue-guidance-discouraging-exercise-is-flawed-say-researchers

ME/CFS guidance that discourages exercise is flawed, say researchers

Study criticises research method behind latest Nice advice for treating chronic fatigue syndrome

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jul/11/chronic-fatigue-guidance-discouraging-exercise-is-flawed-say-researchers

SodOffbacktoaibu · Yesterday 22:59

Ok please just leave it now. The me association disagree with you. The nice guidelines removed it and I know from experience that GET IS proven to be dangerous. We are not going to agree, so there's nothing more to be said.

It absolutely IS dangerous in a physical sense.

NameChange0101010101 · Yesterday 23:03

There has been some recent research into how muscle fibres react differently to exercise in ME. I'll see if I can find a Iink to the paper (phone about to die).

It very much concluded that graded exercise IS dangerous for ME. What are your qualifications for insisting you know that its not, @NotBadConsidering ?

NotBadConsidering · Yesterday 23:11

NameChange0101010101 · Yesterday 23:03

There has been some recent research into how muscle fibres react differently to exercise in ME. I'll see if I can find a Iink to the paper (phone about to die).

It very much concluded that graded exercise IS dangerous for ME. What are your qualifications for insisting you know that its not, @NotBadConsidering ?

This paper, linked in the article I posted above, is from 50 specialists pointing out the anomalies in such research that led to the removal of graded exercise:

https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/94/12/1056

All of these people think it is not dangerous.

CassandraWebb · Yesterday 23:23

NotBadConsidering · Yesterday 22:45

Yes it’s a higher brain issue, a psychiatric issue. There is no physical issue with the brain as far as our understanding of mental health disorders go. We don’t fully understand things like dissociation, how the higher brain/consciousness responds/is impacted by such things.

What you describe about “sending/receiving messages” is to help people get their heads around it, to give them something tangible to describe their condition. Because giving people with FND something tangible and reinforce of the realness of the condition from treating healthcare professionals is how progress towards treatment is made. Saying “it’s all in your mind” has been shown to be the worst way of helping people with FND, it just leads to resistance. It’s important patients believe that their treating doctor/team don’t just think “it’s all in their head” because then they can’t move forward with steps to get better.

For example with pseudo-seizures, there’s no need to say during one “stop lying on the floor shaking! You’re just making it up!” Instead it’s a case of letting it happen but not have everyone clamouring round calling an ambulance/giving drugs/calling the resus team in hospital etc and reducing the stress around such events. With physical leg issues, you can’t just say “you can walk perfectly fine!” Instead they do need physio, rehabilitation etc, like the young woman in the article above whose legs are now deformed as a result.

In many ways CFS/MAS/POTS/EDS diagnoses do actually allow this to happen; once people get their “label” as such, they can then “move on” and focus on treatments, many of which involve the same things. I suspect it’s common in medicine to not fight such diagnoses because is it worth it if the patient is getting physio, rehab, feeling happier and improving?

But as mentioned there are some who don’t ever seem happy at being told things are getting better. Hard to help people in those situations.

But equally often it's a lazy misdiagnosis.

I know so many people "diagnosed" with FND who later had positive test results for Myasthenia (once new blood tests became available)

It's pretty dangerous in that sense. There's a clear physical cause with Myasthenia, it's our neuromuscular junction functions increasingly poorly. I can't positive think my neuromuscular junctions into behaving. I can rest and let them recover.

And Myasthenia has so many parallels with ME (eg resting and pacing is a key remedy) that I strongly doubt your argument that ME has a psychological rather than physical cause. Just because we don't yet know the mechanism doesn't mean it isn't real. Once upon a time people didn't know about viruses but it didn't make them any less real