Secondary School complaint about mixed sex changing rooms. Update, school response and request for help writing the escalated complaint to governors

Sharing this, as it might be helpful. It's from a company which advise schools. I found it today on the Teacher Tapp website (v useful app for the education community to keep abreast of current issues)

https://www.edapt.org.uk/blog/2025/04/supreme-court-ruling-schools-sex-definition/?utm_source=teachertapp&utm_medium=app

Discriminating against a man because he wears a dress is unlawful discrimination against him as a man if a woman in the same situation is permitted to wear a dress.

This is what's never been challenged in the courts. How does statutory safeguarding legislation impact on the allegation that a child (of any age?) has the pc of "gender reassignment".

There's a shedload of issues that should have been explored and clarified in relation to sex change and children. Sadly we've allowed the sex change lobby groups to colonise this aspect of childhood and remove this so vulnerable group of children from basic safeguarding. I really believe that had this been put in front of the courts, it would have been knocked on the head many years ago. Instead we're watching generations of children / young people abandon their future fertility, health and mental wellbeing at the behest of these toxic organisations.

To be protected by the Gender Reassignment characteristic you don’t have to go through a process, you just have to be proposing to. And there is no set process, but things as easy to do as changing your clothing, hairstyle, and names have been cited as actions that are a part of it. Also, an employment tribunal ruling extended coverage to non-binary people, not just those proposing to change their gender to that of the opposite sex (a lower court ruling, so not binding, but unless a higher court rules otherwise, organizations are likely to assume other courts would agree).

So I think it’s quite a lot of kids. In my DC’s 160 person year 10 they have at least 8 kids that I know of who would be covered by that.

The point is, though, that it protects those with the GR characteristic from discrimination and harassment on the basis of their GR. It doesn’t give them a right to be treated as though they were a different sex.

Just as protection on the basis of religious belief protects you from harassment and discrimination on the basis of your belief, it doesn’t give you the right to have your beliefs treated as true by everyone else.

Thanks for the information. Have many school children actually been through a gender reassignment process?

No, you don't need to have a GRC to avail yourself of the gender reassignment protections

No, you don't need to have a GRC to avail yourself of the gender reassignment protections

This is really long.

Have I missed anything?

What have I got wrong or misrepresented?

Subject: Escalation to Stage 2: Formal Complaint Regarding Safeguarding and Mixed-Sex Changing Facilities

Dear xxxx,
I write to formally escalate my safeguarding complaint to Stage 2 under your school complaints procedure. Your Stage 1 response dated 4th April 2025 has failed to address the central safeguarding, legal, and equality concerns I raised. These matters require urgent review at the highest level, as they relate to the welfare, dignity, and legal protection of all children in your care.
Below, I set out the major shortcomings in your Stage 1 response and provide additional legal, practical, and ethical objections. Please ensure each is addressed in full by the Stage 2 review panel.

1 Failure to Guarantee Single-Sex Changing Spaces

You continue to rely on a "case-by-case" approach without ever stating that female and male children will not be required to undress in front of one another. This leaves all pupils—especially females—without a clear, enforceable right to privacy. In your own words, you state: "We wish to avoid putting students who identify as transgender in humiliating or uncomfortable positions." Yet you make no equivalent commitment to female students. Should it not be equally unacceptable to place a female pupil in the humiliating position of having to undress in front of a male peer?

2 Selective and Misleading Use of Statutory Guidance

You cite paragraph 205 of Keeping Children Safe in Education (KCSIE) concerning LGB children, which is irrelevant to this complaint. My concern is not about sexual orientation. It is about biological sex.
Your failure to engage with the safeguarding risks of placing male pupils—regardless of identity—into female spaces misrepresents my concerns and avoids addressing legitimate safeguarding expectations under:

• The Equality Act 2010
• KCSIE 2024
• The School Premises (England) Regulations 2012
• The Human Rights Act 1998

3 Supreme Court Judgment: Definition of Sex

Your policy directly conflicts with the UK Supreme Court's recent ruling (Case UKSC 2024/0042) which confirmed that "man," "woman," "male," and "female" in the Equality Act refer exclusively to biological sex. The Court stated:
"A gender recognition certificate does not erase biological sex."
"The term 'woman' in the Equality Act 2010 refers to a female of any age." "Where the law requires single-sex provision, it means based on biological sex, not gender identity."
Your policy must reflect this legal position. If it does not, I ask whether the school has taken legal advice since this ruling, and if so, whether the advice was shared with your insurers, given the potential for future safeguarding liability.

4 Compelled Speech by Policy or Peer Pressure

You appear to misunderstand the legal concept of compelled speech. When girls are expected to silently accept a male in their changing room—even if presented as an optional arrangement—this creates coercive social pressure. The potential for peer or staff disapproval is itself a form of compulsion.

5 Failure to Apply the "Prudent Parent" Standard

As the designated safeguarding lead, your legal duty is to act as a prudent parent. No prudent parent would place their daughter into a changing room full of male pupils—even those identifying differently. That this would be unthinkable in reverse (placing a lone girl in a male changing room) highlights the gender bias in your current policy.

6 Failure to Address Consent Safeguarding Boundaries

Your response ignores my explicit point: no parent, child, or authority can give permission for a child to see or be seen naked by the opposite sex. Safeguarding principles are not subject to personal preference. The law does not permit children to waive privacy protections.

7Failure to Provide an Equality Impact Assessment (EIA)

You did not provide the Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) that should justify your "case-by-case" approach. I now formally request a copy of this document, redacted as needed.

8 Misapplication of the Gender Reassignment Characteristic

You appear to interpret the Equality Act as granting pupils who identify as trans a right to use opposite-sex facilities. It does not. The Act contains explicit exceptions allowing single-sex spaces. The comparator for someone with the characteristic of gender reassignment is someone of the same sex without the characteristic, not someone of the opposite sex.

9 Practical Safeguarding Oversight

You state that "any pupil who wishes increased privacy will be accommodated." But:

• How are pupils expected to ask for this without disclosing personal trauma, sexual assault, religious conviction or disability?
• How are staff trained to identify silent safeguarding needs where disclosure is unlikely (see Ofsted’s 2021 review)?
• Where is your written framework to assess risks before placing any pupil in an opposite-sex changing space?

10 Documented Risk of Sexual Assault in Schools
Widespread underreporting of sexual abuse in schools is a matter of public record. The BBC (2016), Ofsted (2021) have both shown:

• That girls frequently do not report incidents out of fear, shame, or peer dynamics.
• That safeguarding must work on the presumption that abuse is occurring.

Forcing girls into mixed-sex spaces—even via soft pressure or through policy ambiguity—raises the school’s exposure to criminal, civil, and professional liability, particularly for:

• Indecent exposure
• Voyeurism
• Sexual harassment under the Equality Act

11 Indirect Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief
You state that the needs of faith-based students will be considered, but provide no evidence of:

• How religious requirements for same-sex privacy are recorded, updated, and verified.
• What alternative options are made available to preserve these beliefs.
• Whether any impact assessments have been conducted to understand how "case-by-case" deters some faith communities from attending School XXX altogether.

12 Request for Documentation
In accordance with FOIA and best transparency practice, I now formally request:

• Your full legal advice (or a summary thereof) on mixed-sex changing policies.
• The school’s Equality Impact Assessment.
• The policy documents and training materials provided to staff about changing room access.
• The name(s) of the individual(s) responsible for authorising this policy and managing safeguarding risks.

Final Observations

Your current approach leaves girls unprotected, parents in the dark, and the school exposed to future challenge. As per the Equality and Human Rights Commission:

"A suitable alternative might be to allow the pupil to use private changing facilities, such as the staff changing room or another suitable space."

This solution provides dignity and privacy to all pupils without sacrificing the legal rights or safeguarding of others.

Unless a clear and permanent assurance is made that changing spaces will remain single-sex and that opposite-sex entry will never be permitted, I will:

• Escalate this complaint to the full Governing Body.
• Refer the matter to Brighton & Hove’s Local Authority Designated Officer (LADO).
• Refer the matter to Ofsted and the Department for Education.
• Consider initiating legal action and contacting the press.

I look forward to your acknowledgment and confirmation of the complaints panel process within five working days.
Yours sincerely,
xxx xxxxx
Father of two pupils at xxxxxx School