Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Prisoners forced to give birth handcuffed to male prison guards

59 replies

ArabellaScott · 21/02/2025 20:43

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/pregnant-women-prison-birth-handcuffed-male-officers-5f0698ks8#Echobox=1740164394-3

Horrific.

'At least two women have come forward over incidents that occurred at HMP Bronzefield in Surrey between 2021 and 2023, with a number of other women also understood to have been affected. Bhatt Murphy Solicitors, who are representing the women, have described it a systematic issue inside the largest female prison in Europe.
The women allege they were handcuffed to male officers, sometimes during antenatal appointments and intimate vaginal examinations, as well as during labour.
One prisoner said she was held in restraints during antenatal appointments and for 48 hours while in labour, at points attached to male staff.
“Being handcuffed and without any privacy, including being chained to a male prison officer, made me feel humiliated and degraded,” she told The Times. “Yes, I had broken the law, but I was still a pregnant woman. I feel I was treated as less than an animal.”'

https://archive.ph/Gk804

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/02/2025 22:59

Grammarnut · 25/02/2025 19:51

They used to. Now we have equal ops.

The Equality Act 2010 allows for single-sex staff where it's a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. The prison companies could use that legal exemption to give imprisoned mothers the basic dignity of female warders during childbirth.

Grammarnut · 25/02/2025 19:51

caringcarer · 24/02/2025 18:57

The least they should do is have female prison guards with pregnant women. If they are in a locked room they can hardly run away or escape.

They used to. Now we have equal ops.

Grammarnut · 25/02/2025 19:50

duc748 · 23/02/2025 01:49

Jeez, are we in the Nineteenth century?

Edited

Wouldn't have happened in the 19th century - they were very hot on only having female warders for female prisoners. This is regression.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 24/02/2025 20:43

TheClaaaaaaaw · 24/02/2025 18:56

That poster has posted equally shitty things in the past. She’s a paediatric nurse and calls herself a Christian…. 🧐

Horrible, truly horrible.

She clearly didn't read Matthew 9:1-8 and Mark 2:1-12, Matthew 9:10 and Mark 2:13, the list goes on...

wonderstuff · 24/02/2025 19:05

But if the very act of locking up pregnant women drastically increases their risk in a pregnancy, surely we just need to stop doing that? At the very least it should be a last resort reserved for only cases where the woman is a threat to others safety.

caringcarer · 24/02/2025 18:57

The least they should do is have female prison guards with pregnant women. If they are in a locked room they can hardly run away or escape.

TheClaaaaaaaw · 24/02/2025 18:56

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 24/02/2025 17:08

I am disappointed that you have posted this. I'm never going to be able to read your posts on the Litter Tray again without remembering that you are OK with women being handcuffed to men whilst they give birth.

That poster has posted equally shitty things in the past. She’s a paediatric nurse and calls herself a Christian…. 🧐

Horrible, truly horrible.

wonderstuff · 24/02/2025 18:54

There is so much evidence that prisoners can not access safe ante natal care and are in much greater danger in labour, I can see no other reasonable course of action than to stop imprisonment of women who are pregnant. There must be other ways of monitoring and safeguarding?

That poor girl who had to Labour alone in her cell because no one answered her call and then bit through to umbilical cord was on remand, I seem to recall charges were later dropped. The report into her case made it really clear that women in prison can not access care comparable to women in the community. And goodness knows sometimes even that falls short!

NotDarkGothicMama · 24/02/2025 18:42

What on Earth?! Who thinks this is appropriate treatment and why? What's a woman in labour going to do that necessitates being handcuffed or shackled to anyone or anything? I could - maybe - understand if she was psychotic and liable to hurt herself/others if unrestrained, but in that case wouldn't you go for a c-section under GA? Otherwise, just no.

Waitwhat23 · 24/02/2025 18:36

I'm rather glad I didn't see the now deleted posts as I'm sure from context that they would have been utterly lacking in humanity towards vulnerable women.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 24/02/2025 18:34

duc748 · 24/02/2025 18:10

In fact, didn't one of the wrongly-accused postmistresses have to give birth in prison?

No, she was paroled before her due date and had to give birth with one of those ankle tags on.

duc748 · 24/02/2025 18:10

In fact, didn't one of the wrongly-accused postmistresses have to give birth in prison?

ThreeWordHarpy · 24/02/2025 17:48

Not everyone in prison has broken the law. Most recent example of miscarriage of justice being the Post Office/Horizon scandal. I’m sure attitudes like yours gave the sub-postmasters comfort. /s

as has been said previously, when someone receives a custodial sentence, the intended punishment is the deprivation of liberty. Not the cruel and inhumane conditions described while in jail. Prisoners are still human beings and it is the state’s responsibility to ensure they receive adequate housing, food, clothing and medical treatment.

ETA: The post I was replying to was deleted but I’m sure you can work out who I was addressing.

Craftysue · 24/02/2025 17:35

Surely they can wait outside the door? I'm sure a woman in labour isn't going to get far. It can't be pleasant for the prison staff either. I can't believe this is happening in 21st century Britain

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 24/02/2025 17:30

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 24/02/2025 16:34

I think even the Victorians would have thought twice about shackling a woman in labour to a guard. I thought we'd got past this after the hoo ha when Ann Widdecombe was Prisons Minister.

Indeed. The Gaols Act 1823 and the Prisons Act 1835 were both passed before Queen Victoria ascended the throne. The Gaols Act required separate prisons for men and women, female warders in women's prisons, and banned the use of irons and shackles in women's prisons. The Prisons Act established prison inspectors to ensure that these rules were followed.

It is absolutely batshit that we have gone backwards on this by allowing male prison warders, allowing male prisoners as long as they claim to be trans, and are shackling mothers in labour.

Elizabeth Fry is doing a couple of thousand revolutions per minute in her grave right now.

teentantrums · 24/02/2025 17:10

StormingNorman · 24/02/2025 16:26

Makes no difference to the baby if mum is handcuffed to a guard.

Are you joking? There are plenty of studies which show that it is more harmful for both mother and baby. Plus, there is absolutely no need. No woman has ever escaped during labour!

ArabellaScott · 24/02/2025 17:09

I was going to say that thankfully as a society we're not as vengeful, callous, and uneducated as some posters on this thread, but then I think about the teenger being left to give birth alone to a stillborn baby, and wonder.

OP posts:
selffellatingouroborosofhate · 24/02/2025 17:08

Toddlerteaplease · 24/02/2025 16:04

Was going to say the same.

I am disappointed that you have posted this. I'm never going to be able to read your posts on the Litter Tray again without remembering that you are OK with women being handcuffed to men whilst they give birth.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 24/02/2025 16:59

StormingNorman · 24/02/2025 16:26

Makes no difference to the baby if mum is handcuffed to a guard.

It can. If the mother is stressed and in needless pain, the baby will be stressed too because the baby can hear what's happening and cortisol crosses the placenta. If the mother is struggling to labour because she doesn't have free movement within the birth suite, for example to stand up or go on all-fours, that can harm the baby too because the baby isn't in the right position, can end up with umbilical cord around neck, etc.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 24/02/2025 16:54

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

  1. Most women in prison are there for shoplifting, not murder.
  2. Human rights are for all humans, not just the ones we like.
  3. There's also an innocent baby involved who is at risk of harm.
selffellatingouroborosofhate · 24/02/2025 16:52

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Giving birth in medically-dangerous circumstances isn't a punishment, it's torture. A birthing woman needs to be able to move freely to minimise the risk of birth injuries.

Cloudberry24 · 24/02/2025 16:40

SwanOfThoseThings · 24/02/2025 16:31

With the caveat that I have never been in labour myself, so my view of it is formed by TV etc. I should have thought being shackled to anyone or anything would be extremely painful when the body is being subject to violent involuntary movements. We don't put people in prison to torture them.

Deprivation of liberty is the punishment, not this horrific treatment.

Cloudberry24 · 24/02/2025 16:38

duc748 · 23/02/2025 01:49

Jeez, are we in the Nineteenth century?

Edited

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-66339627.amp

Seems so.

onlytherain · 24/02/2025 16:36

Disgusting. Also extremely dumb, because the stress and resulting trauma do not just impact the mothers, but also the babies. This will affect the babies' brains longterm and cost society a lot of money to try to "fix".

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 24/02/2025 16:34

I think even the Victorians would have thought twice about shackling a woman in labour to a guard. I thought we'd got past this after the hoo ha when Ann Widdecombe was Prisons Minister.

Swipe left for the next trending thread