Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Can we talk about bisexuality?

462 replies

Pluvia · 25/01/2025 10:58

Just that really. I'm a lesbian, one of a number seeking to rebuild new lesbian and LGB networks after our established communities and events and hang-outs and culture have been trashed by the TQIA+ brigade.

Lesbians and gay men are feeling really beleaguered. We've seen almost every sphere of gay and lesbian life infiltrated by 'queer', trans and spicy straight people all using the events and groups we've founded for their own purposes — mainly of validation. Pride has been taken over by the T. Our cafes, pubs, bars, all gone.

I think a significant number of gay and lesbian activists are finding it increasingly difficult to work out where bisexuality fits into all this. I'm in a number of different LGB groups and this issue has started to crop up in them. People who join describing themselves as bisexual and wanting to get involved in helping rebuild their local LGB communities turn out to be in long-term, stable heterosexual relationships. Some of them for 20+ years. Some bi people in such relationships want to involve their straight partners on the basis that although the partner is straight, they are in relationship with a bi person who isn't — but who, to the outside world, looks straight.

Does it matter? Well, if you're in a heterosexual relationship you're unlikely to experience the everyday (usually minor) moments that most of us who are out still encounter. Things like the need to come out regularly to people who assume that we're in straight relationships, the slight but still palpable 'othering' that sometimes comes when people realise they're talking to someone who isn't just like them. Sometimes it's much more pointed. And if we hold, say, an LGB club night, so that LGB people can associate without the straight gaze, should we allow bisexuals to bring their straight partners? Doesn't that negate the intention of the event?

Bisexual people who are living in a heterosexual relationship have the security of being undercover. They may not see it like that, of course, but they pass as straight. I'm pretty sure that one of the bi women who's involved in one of the groups I'm in is a straight woman who bases her bisexual identity on the fact that she had a relationship with a woman while at university, many years ago.

I don't know if there's a solution to this. I think lesbians and gay men are much more cautious around the dangers of self-ID and identity politics than they ever were. How are other groups handling this?

OP posts:
Theuniversalshere1 · 26/01/2025 12:35

Pluvia · 26/01/2025 12:12

You don't get it. Thank you for helping to show other readers what lesbians are up against. Yours is the kind of reaction that makes lesbian-only or even LGB only events and groups such a relief, because no one in a same-sex relationship would say it.

What she demonstrated by crying after sex and asking me if she'd made a mistake leaving her husband was that she was straight — or if not entirely straight, still straight-inclined and definitely straight-thinking. And that's not what a woman seeking relationships with women-centred women is looking for. And not what I was expecting when I met her in an exclusively lesbian venue.

Edited

Exactamundo.

Theuniversalshere1 · 26/01/2025 12:30

MoreAgreeableMyArse · 26/01/2025 00:14

Oh. You really don't get it.
Ok.
I am talking about a dating context, but I think it's applicable to non sexual / romantic/ social contexts too.

If you are female and genuinely looking for a female partner/company , you know you won't have an issue right?

Opening up lesbian spaces to people who have no interest in vaginas, (or allowing them to bring their straight male partners) , or allowing male people in based on identity, messes it up for women who are only interested in women.

This applies to mixed sex gay spaces too.

I feel like this should be obvious. Especially to a lesbian or bisexual woman.

I'm going to paraphrase my position.

It is perfectly acceptable for females who are exclusively attracted to females, to have spaces where no males are allowed.

It is perfectly acceptable for males who are exclusively attracted to males, to have spaces where no females are allowed.

It is perfectly acceptable for homosexuals who are exclusively attracted to people of the same sex , to have spaces where no people who are not exclusively attracted to the same sex are allowed.

Finish.

People who are (or claim to be) bisexual, have no right to those spaces on the basis of their bisexuality.

They are probably welcome (individually) on the basis of their same sex attraction but they have to actually like tipping the velvet/ glazing the donut

And most importantly, you absolute plonkers, they can't bring their boyfriend / husband or girlfriend /wife, which some people seem to be trying to earnestly argue they should be allowed to.

Spare me.

And more importantly, take a look at yourself, you petulant, impressionable... Neo Puritans.

Leave lesbian spaces alone!

Well said!

OneAmberFinch · 26/01/2025 12:18

Pluvia · 26/01/2025 12:02

Why does one need LB knitting clubs? If I wanted to go to a knitting club, I want people who can show me how to use a cable needle or knit a lace shawl or something. My L cousin refused to join a local LGB gardening club, because she wasn't the allotment for her vegetables not her sexuality. It isn't relevant there, or shouldn't be, what anyone's sexuality is. I haven't asked if this is something she thinks about only now she's older, or if she always thought it back in her 2nd wave, politically active youth. (She's still politically activein retirement, to be fair.)
I can understand single sex sports clubs, where it's about physical difference, but that's single sex, not single sexuality.

All sorts of perfectly good reasons. (And why do you assume that LGB can't know? Is knitting the preserve of straight folk?) A lot of LGB people end up being a bit isolated. The world is still very heterosexual, which you only notice if you're not. I'm an older lesbian without children and grandchildren and I find many women of my age have very little to talk about beyond their families. And even though we have nice neighbours, I know that my partner and I are regarded as different by many households in the street and held at arms length. You don't get that with an LGB group. Your sexuality isn't an issue. And because you've probably had similar experiences, you have those in common. Whereas I have very little in common with an awful lot of straight women.

Is it not more accurate to say that you don't have an awful lot in common with hetero-married women with children and grandchildren?

The gap in experiences is the meaningful dividing line - not the gap in what kind of attraction you may or may not hypothetically feel.

EBearhug · 26/01/2025 12:12

MsGoodWife · 26/01/2025 12:09

@EBearhug you've picked the most irrelevant sentence in the OP's reply to you. She's given you some insight which has completely gone over your head.

No, I just haven't anything to say to it. There are plenty of posts in MN where I don't respond to every single point. It doesn't mean it's gone over my head.

Pluvia · 26/01/2025 12:12

EBearhug · 26/01/2025 11:42

I'm plunged back to one particularly awful night when I was fairly newly out on the scene and had been chatted up by an older woman at a lesbian-only venue. We went to her place and after we'd had what seemed to me like pretty good sex, she sat in bed crying about divorcing her ex-husband and asking me whether I thought she'd make a mistake.

That would probably have been just as awful if she'd been crying about her ex-wife, though.

You don't get it. Thank you for helping to show other readers what lesbians are up against. Yours is the kind of reaction that makes lesbian-only or even LGB only events and groups such a relief, because no one in a same-sex relationship would say it.

What she demonstrated by crying after sex and asking me if she'd made a mistake leaving her husband was that she was straight — or if not entirely straight, still straight-inclined and definitely straight-thinking. And that's not what a woman seeking relationships with women-centred women is looking for. And not what I was expecting when I met her in an exclusively lesbian venue.

OP posts:
HermioneWeasley · 26/01/2025 12:11

All the posters saying perhaps there needs to be spaces for bi women, nothing is stopping you setting that up. If you’re a bi woman in a heterosexual relationship and want to meet others and discuss your invisibility and missing women, then do so.

I find it interesting because my bisexuality is also hidden by being in a long term same sex relationship, but I don’t recognise the longing for a man or the need to let everyone know my sexuality is different to what they assume.

MsGoodWife · 26/01/2025 12:09

@EBearhug you've picked the most irrelevant sentence in the OP's reply to you. She's given you some insight which has completely gone over your head.

EBearhug · 26/01/2025 12:08

The world is still very heterosexual, which you only notice if you're not.

It's very coupley, and as someone who's been single most of my life, that's very noticeable. But as you say, people only notice if they're not part of it.

EBearhug · 26/01/2025 12:07

And why do you assume that LGB can't know? Is knitting the preserve of straight folk?

I'm not assuming that at all, but it's their knitting knowledge which is pertinent in that context, not their sexuality. I've been involved with various groups (not knitting, though,) over the years, and I often haven't known whether people are in relationships at all, and if they are, what sort of relationship, because it's generally not relevant.

Pluvia · 26/01/2025 12:02

Why does one need LB knitting clubs? If I wanted to go to a knitting club, I want people who can show me how to use a cable needle or knit a lace shawl or something. My L cousin refused to join a local LGB gardening club, because she wasn't the allotment for her vegetables not her sexuality. It isn't relevant there, or shouldn't be, what anyone's sexuality is. I haven't asked if this is something she thinks about only now she's older, or if she always thought it back in her 2nd wave, politically active youth. (She's still politically activein retirement, to be fair.)
I can understand single sex sports clubs, where it's about physical difference, but that's single sex, not single sexuality.

All sorts of perfectly good reasons. (And why do you assume that LGB can't know? Is knitting the preserve of straight folk?) A lot of LGB people end up being a bit isolated. The world is still very heterosexual, which you only notice if you're not. I'm an older lesbian without children and grandchildren and I find many women of my age have very little to talk about beyond their families. And even though we have nice neighbours, I know that my partner and I are regarded as different by many households in the street and held at arms length. You don't get that with an LGB group. Your sexuality isn't an issue. And because you've probably had similar experiences, you have those in common. Whereas I have very little in common with an awful lot of straight women.

OP posts:
MsGoodWife · 26/01/2025 11:53

EBearhug · 26/01/2025 11:24

If it was a bi women at a LB sports club, knitting group or similar i would assume she just wanted to make friends.

Why does one need LB knitting clubs? If I wanted to go to a knitting club, I want people who can show me how to use a cable needle or knit a lace shawl or something. My L cousin refused to join a local LGB gardening club, because she wasn't the allotment for her vegetables not her sexuality. It isn't relevant there, or shouldn't be, what anyone's sexuality is. I haven't asked if this is something she thinks about only now she's older, or if she always thought it back in her 2nd wave, politically active youth. (She's still politically activein retirement, to be fair.)

I can understand single sex sports clubs, where it's about physical difference, but that's single sex, not single sexuality.

For some, it's about community. Being with other lesbians sometimes, we have experiences in common, it's different to anything else. Just because your lesbian cousin doesn't need or want it, doesn't mean others don't.

ADHDspoonie · 26/01/2025 11:50

Twoshoesnewshoes · 26/01/2025 10:42

Wow, this thread is something else!
still feeling from reading @MoreAgreeableMyArse ‘bi women don’t ‘face’ anything’
the hostility on here towards bi women such as myself is shocking.
i came in here to support LGB spaces but am now also agreeing that perhaps bi women need their own space where we don’t face ignorance such as the comments above.

i have had serious relationships with both males and females, and am married to a male, very long term.
im very happy with my DP, and yet I also have the gap, the ‘constant craving’ of not being with a woman.
i would like to meet others who understand this, and who also appreciate that we do ‘face’ stuff - not least the blatant hostility of that type of comment!

I'd love to meet others who understand it too. I'm super happy with my DP, he's amazing. But that doesn't mean I don't want to connect with people like me. I'd love to meet people who 'get it'. I have incredible friends, but they can only ever understand it to a certain extent because they haven't experienced it.

EBearhug · 26/01/2025 11:42

I'm plunged back to one particularly awful night when I was fairly newly out on the scene and had been chatted up by an older woman at a lesbian-only venue. We went to her place and after we'd had what seemed to me like pretty good sex, she sat in bed crying about divorcing her ex-husband and asking me whether I thought she'd make a mistake.

That would probably have been just as awful if she'd been crying about her ex-wife, though.

ADHDspoonie · 26/01/2025 11:35

Yes some men in relationships do actually harrass their bisexual partners for Threesomes etc. Again, its not rare. It's much harder to leave once you have kids (for me, he didn't start pestering me until AFTER we had a child, if I'd known my DC probably wouldn't exist. Hindsight is 20/20). I eventually did leave but it took a long time because I didn't want to break up the family unit. I'm not poly, I never have been. Hence why we're not together anymore but that relationship formed a large part of my adulthood so far. It's not easy to leave abusive relationships, particularly without support.

I've never been to a gay bar when in a relationship with a man.

Being in a straight relationship doesn't make me straight. Being bi in a straight relationship can come with it's own set of challenges due to stereotypes. It doesn't mean that I don't want to connect with others in the community and be accepted for me. Am I less deserving of support if needed by the community just because I'm bi? Regardless of relationship status. I'm not asking to be accepted into lesbian only spaces, I'm asking to feel welcome in spaces where bi women ARE supposedly welcome. I'm asking to not be treated with visible disgust as soon as I say I'm bi.

Currently the only way I'm accepted as a Bi woman is if I don't talk about it, and that's wrong.

Pluvia · 26/01/2025 11:28

I had a very good night out last night and I'm not at my best today, to put it mildly, but I've tried to read through the opinions here. Lots of food for thought.

I'm surprised to realise that people are basing their self-definitions on their sexual fantasies. I shouldn't be, because the whole toxic gender identity disaster is based on fantasy and that's why lesbians and gay men are having their spaces invaded by men who identify as women and women as men. But even so, I am.

I've also been sent reeling back through some of my past 'lesbian' encounters and the number of women trying to find a relationship that matches their fantasy-based expectations of what a lesbian relationship should be. Which too often ends badly because lesbians are real and fantasies aren't. Most lesbians will have encountered women at lesbian-only events who say they are lesbians and women-focussed, yet talk constantly about their husbands. I'm plunged back to one particularly awful night when I was fairly newly out on the scene and had been chatted up by an older woman at a lesbian-only venue. We went to her place and after we'd had what seemed to me like pretty good sex, she sat in bed crying about divorcing her ex-husband and asking me whether I thought she'd make a mistake.

A previous poster posted this, and right now it resonates with me more than anything else here:

The question is, what are these groups for? If they're little identify clubs that meet to discuss how attractive this or that person is, then sure, welcome people like me. But of course, what people really need is a group to help them navigate a life lived with same sex relationships: a space free from your relationships being politicised, sexualised or othered, a place of support and activism, somewhere to meet other people who have the same experiences, somewhere to meet romantic partners. And I genuinely don't think there's much point in opening these spaces up to people who don't live life in a way that involves same sex relationships.

That's what the groups I've been involved in have sought/ seek to offer. It seems to me, from what I've learned here, that bisexual people need their own groups/ events/ lobbyists/ spokespeople/ movement, because if they leave it to the L + G to do it for them (L+G form the large majority of LGB Alliance members and organise the majority of social events etc) they are unlikely to get what they need or want. That's not being biphobic. It's about me, a lesbian, saying that I acknowledge that we are different and need different things.

OP posts:
EBearhug · 26/01/2025 11:24

If it was a bi women at a LB sports club, knitting group or similar i would assume she just wanted to make friends.

Why does one need LB knitting clubs? If I wanted to go to a knitting club, I want people who can show me how to use a cable needle or knit a lace shawl or something. My L cousin refused to join a local LGB gardening club, because she wasn't the allotment for her vegetables not her sexuality. It isn't relevant there, or shouldn't be, what anyone's sexuality is. I haven't asked if this is something she thinks about only now she's older, or if she always thought it back in her 2nd wave, politically active youth. (She's still politically activein retirement, to be fair.)

I can understand single sex sports clubs, where it's about physical difference, but that's single sex, not single sexuality.

Twoshoesnewshoes · 26/01/2025 10:42

Wow, this thread is something else!
still feeling from reading @MoreAgreeableMyArse ‘bi women don’t ‘face’ anything’
the hostility on here towards bi women such as myself is shocking.
i came in here to support LGB spaces but am now also agreeing that perhaps bi women need their own space where we don’t face ignorance such as the comments above.

i have had serious relationships with both males and females, and am married to a male, very long term.
im very happy with my DP, and yet I also have the gap, the ‘constant craving’ of not being with a woman.
i would like to meet others who understand this, and who also appreciate that we do ‘face’ stuff - not least the blatant hostility of that type of comment!

SlowPony · 26/01/2025 10:05

I have no problem with straight couples wanting to spice up their sex life with a third

Ugh, I have a lot of problems with that. That was one of the reasons we needed support groups for partners. To separate "my partner is bisexual" from "my partner is polyamorous" from "my relationship is fucked".

IllustratedDictionaryOfTheDoldrums · 26/01/2025 09:41

From my understanding of these spaces as a bi woman with a lot of lesbian friends, the vast majority of lesbians are more than happy to include bi women in events.
However, what they don't like is the spicy straights and there's a LOT of that. I have no problem with straight couples wanting to spice up their sex life with a third but that third needs to be fully interested. It's not appropriate to use lesbian spaces for that.
I've come across so many 'bi' women on dating apps who aren't interested in relationships with women but are openly about looking for sex where 'my husband will just watch'.
A lot of lesbians have had to deal with that nonsense. I don't blame them for being wary.

SlowPony · 26/01/2025 09:26

I don't have have any insight into how people are doing it nowadays but just thinking back into my distant past as heterosexual partner of bisexual man... Where I lived in the late 80s & 90s (not London!) there was a bi-specific group and bisexuals organised themslves separately. There were bi meetings, support groups, activism and socials. It wasn't just about finding partners though there was plenty of that going on. Access was all self identified and given the range of bisexuality it couldn't really have worked any other way. The bi group met in the local LG centre (later LGB centre), they organised for themselves, support groups, and also did activism along with L and G groups, campaigns against Section 28, demos, buses to Pride marches, etc.

As a heterosexual partner I didn't go along to bi meetings or events unless they were "bi + allies" or "partners of bisexual support" meetings. I did once go with them to a gay club where I felt like a pork chop at a barmitzvah.

As far as I was concerned DP was a bisexual man in a heterosexual relationship. Heterosexual relationships are privileged over same-sex ones and that is one of the reasons I wanted gay marriage and gay equality so I could have confidence my DP was with me for my sake not for the sake of safety or privelege. However naive that may sound now.

Same as, I went to women's events but not to specifically lesbian or bi women's events. As a heterosexual partner I didn't expect to be included in everything LG or B, why should I.

PriOn1 · 26/01/2025 09:17

I struck me hard, when there was a big push, maybe a year ago, for supposed protection of asexual as a sexuality. I found myself wondering, why does anyone need protection for something invisible.

Exactly the same applies to bisexual people in heterosexual relationships.

The reason gay and lesbian people need protection in law and elsewhere is because they deserve to be openly in a same sex relationship. It’s something you cannot hide if you want to live a normal life where you go out with your partner or spouse, like heterosexual couples do.

So if you are socializing with other gay people, or lesbian people, because you enjoy being with others who are also living through that, then it makes sense to only have those currently in homosexual relationships involved.

If you want to get together with others who more broadly identify as “being other than heterosexual” because you value that, perhaps because you feel they have some understanding of homosexuality that heterosexual people can’t understand, then fair enough.

But I think both are reasonable and you should be able to arrange meetings for either without others getting offended. The problem now is that the perpetually offended have the upper hand and demand entrance everywhere, and they have been backed by all kinds of institutions that should have been protecting gay and lesbian people as well.

It’s a mess.

KnutsfordCityLimits · 26/01/2025 08:20

I would be interested in a GC bisexual women's group @TheColourOutOfSpace. There is no LGB alliance group near me, and in fact based on my previous experience of being rejected by the lesbian community I probably wouldn't have joined anyway as I would've assumed I wouldn't be welcome, but maybe things have changed. I did identify as a lesbian for the first 10 years of my adult life, and I'm not in a relationship with anyone now. The rejection by my former lesbian friends and the wider community is as much a part, maybe more, of being wary about a relationship with a woman as it being "easier" to have a heterosexual relationship as @selffellatingouroborosofhate also highlights up thread.

Violintime · 26/01/2025 08:13

adminicle · 26/01/2025 07:44

they will always be bisexual and may well have a same sex relationship in the future.

100% and this is what's in danger of being forgotten. Your bisexuality doesn't desert you when you are in an opposite sex relationship. I would struggle to believe that lesbians in a relationship only ever think sexually about their current partner, never feel attracted to another woman, never remember exes with some fondness, even though they wouldn't dream of being unfaithful.

As I mentioned earlier, and sorry if it sounds dramatic, it's a source of despair to me sometimes that I can't be with a woman at the same time as being with a man. There might be some bisexuals who feel complete fulfilment with whichever orientation they are living with long-term, but I'm not one of them - there will always be something missing in a monogamous relationship. That's why I have always been open with partners about my sexuality; it helps to be able to talk about it and not to have to be in denial about part of myself.

Perhaps I should be more 'out and proud' in settings such as work, but I don't want to be seen as an attention-seeking bore in situations where it's not relevant. As a matter of fact, I did join the 'LBGTQ+' group as a 'member' rather than an 'ally' but I doubt anyone noticed 😃 and I'm not very active in the group because it tends to centre things that are of no interest to me, such as drag.

This. Totally.

Why did I go to LGB groups when I was in a monogamous relationship with a man? Because I needed a space for my sexuality, where I wasn’t assumed to be straight. It’s bloody lonely and I wanted some friends who understood I had something missing in my life- and always will do.

Why do I still go, now I’m in a monogamous relationship with a woman? Exactly the same reasons.

I haven’t changed, my reasons haven’t changed-yet some people are saying I wouldn’t be welcome before but am now.

The different way the world views me and treats me when I’m in a relationship with a man vs a woman has been a bit of head-fuck. I’d naively assumed that was a hetero-normative problem. It’s sad to see it’s just as bad on the lesbian side too.

If you aren’t willing to embrace all the complexities of bisexuality then take the B out of the name of your group. For me, going to a space like that was a massive step towards a same sex relationship. I’m glad I met more open minded women than some on this thread.

adminicle · 26/01/2025 07:44

they will always be bisexual and may well have a same sex relationship in the future.

100% and this is what's in danger of being forgotten. Your bisexuality doesn't desert you when you are in an opposite sex relationship. I would struggle to believe that lesbians in a relationship only ever think sexually about their current partner, never feel attracted to another woman, never remember exes with some fondness, even though they wouldn't dream of being unfaithful.

As I mentioned earlier, and sorry if it sounds dramatic, it's a source of despair to me sometimes that I can't be with a woman at the same time as being with a man. There might be some bisexuals who feel complete fulfilment with whichever orientation they are living with long-term, but I'm not one of them - there will always be something missing in a monogamous relationship. That's why I have always been open with partners about my sexuality; it helps to be able to talk about it and not to have to be in denial about part of myself.

Perhaps I should be more 'out and proud' in settings such as work, but I don't want to be seen as an attention-seeking bore in situations where it's not relevant. As a matter of fact, I did join the 'LBGTQ+' group as a 'member' rather than an 'ally' but I doubt anyone noticed 😃 and I'm not very active in the group because it tends to centre things that are of no interest to me, such as drag.

TheColourOutOfSpace · 26/01/2025 07:38

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/01/2025 16:20

Good luck finding a gender critical bisexual group. They simply don't exist.

There is one that exists now for bisexual women. 😊

Swipe left for the next trending thread