Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Can we talk about bisexuality?

462 replies

Pluvia · 25/01/2025 10:58

Just that really. I'm a lesbian, one of a number seeking to rebuild new lesbian and LGB networks after our established communities and events and hang-outs and culture have been trashed by the TQIA+ brigade.

Lesbians and gay men are feeling really beleaguered. We've seen almost every sphere of gay and lesbian life infiltrated by 'queer', trans and spicy straight people all using the events and groups we've founded for their own purposes — mainly of validation. Pride has been taken over by the T. Our cafes, pubs, bars, all gone.

I think a significant number of gay and lesbian activists are finding it increasingly difficult to work out where bisexuality fits into all this. I'm in a number of different LGB groups and this issue has started to crop up in them. People who join describing themselves as bisexual and wanting to get involved in helping rebuild their local LGB communities turn out to be in long-term, stable heterosexual relationships. Some of them for 20+ years. Some bi people in such relationships want to involve their straight partners on the basis that although the partner is straight, they are in relationship with a bi person who isn't — but who, to the outside world, looks straight.

Does it matter? Well, if you're in a heterosexual relationship you're unlikely to experience the everyday (usually minor) moments that most of us who are out still encounter. Things like the need to come out regularly to people who assume that we're in straight relationships, the slight but still palpable 'othering' that sometimes comes when people realise they're talking to someone who isn't just like them. Sometimes it's much more pointed. And if we hold, say, an LGB club night, so that LGB people can associate without the straight gaze, should we allow bisexuals to bring their straight partners? Doesn't that negate the intention of the event?

Bisexual people who are living in a heterosexual relationship have the security of being undercover. They may not see it like that, of course, but they pass as straight. I'm pretty sure that one of the bi women who's involved in one of the groups I'm in is a straight woman who bases her bisexual identity on the fact that she had a relationship with a woman while at university, many years ago.

I don't know if there's a solution to this. I think lesbians and gay men are much more cautious around the dangers of self-ID and identity politics than they ever were. How are other groups handling this?

OP posts:
Theuniversalshere1 · 25/01/2025 15:03

Pluvia · 25/01/2025 14:58

I can understand why a bisexual woman or man might want to come to an LGB event. But the LGB community, or what's left of it, has been largely destroyed by the TQ+ — and the + includes an awful lot of straight people and straight couples who identify as Queer and people often referred to as Spicy Straights, ie straight people who think that identifying as LGBTQIA+ makes them more interesting than ordinary straight people. There have been a lot of straight people winging it by claiming to be bisexual and that's something that perhaps bi people need to get angry about.

We lost Pride and everything else to (mainly) straight T men and their 'feelings'. I know I'm more nervous about people basing their identities on their feelings now than I've ever been and perhaps some of that is what's bothering me here.

I totally get this and agree as lesbian woman.

Things have changed, however I do feel the tide will change again. It seems like a popular period in time to be some form of queer and I think this will change again and thing for us will change again.

Maybe not though!

You're brave to mention it also, as I think a lot of lesbians experience it. Ifs just not widely discussed.

Even gayscenes are very very different these days.

TheCatsTongue · 25/01/2025 15:03

MarieDeGournay · 25/01/2025 14:11

TheCatsTongue It's interesting that 50 years ago, straight people and gay people didn't exist. You were just a person who had same-sex relationships. There was no identity around it. Think of it more akin to hair or eye colour.

1975?? In 1975 there were no straight people or gay people and no identity around sexual orientation?? And being gay was kind-of like hair or eye colour?
And you just got on happily with your life just like a blonde or a brunette with grey or brown eyes got on with their life without any problems from wider society?

This shows a deep lack of knowledge of lesbian and gay history, which goes way back before 1975.

No, you misunderstand my post (perhaps deliberately), this is about the formation of an identity.

We all know that homosexual activity was illegal for the majority of the 20th century. But the laws were around acts, not the idea of a "gay man". The concept of sexual orientation goes back to the 1800s, but then there is a further formation of an identity around sexual orientation much later.

This thread is very much about labels, and for a long time people didn't have labels for WHO they are, but WHAT they were.

TempestTost · 25/01/2025 15:02

adminicle · 25/01/2025 14:53

By that definition, I've identified as bisexual for over 30 years - basically since I realised I wasn't a lesbian.

I am not sure what you mean, or maybe, I'm not sure what your point is.

Pluvia · 25/01/2025 14:58

NoCarbsForMe · 25/01/2025 14:32

If you're bi in a straight relationship why would you want to go to lesbian events.

Also wondering why your straight male partner would want to attend.

I can understand why a bisexual woman or man might want to come to an LGB event. But the LGB community, or what's left of it, has been largely destroyed by the TQ+ — and the + includes an awful lot of straight people and straight couples who identify as Queer and people often referred to as Spicy Straights, ie straight people who think that identifying as LGBTQIA+ makes them more interesting than ordinary straight people. There have been a lot of straight people winging it by claiming to be bisexual and that's something that perhaps bi people need to get angry about.

We lost Pride and everything else to (mainly) straight T men and their 'feelings'. I know I'm more nervous about people basing their identities on their feelings now than I've ever been and perhaps some of that is what's bothering me here.

OP posts:
BoeotianNightmare · 25/01/2025 14:57

Have only read the first post so no doubt I'm repeating what others have said but totally agree with you OP. I'm bi but have been with a man for many years, and don't feel I need or deserve any place in your community except on the outside as an ally to my lesbian sisters.

As you so eloquently said, to all intents and purposes I'm straight and will be viewed as such, I've never been on the receiving end of homophobia and it's not my place to claim to understand this from personal experience. If I was with a woman it would be different. Very few of my friends know my sexuality because who cares? The whole "bi visibility" thing annoys me. "We" are not invisible, it's just not relevant or necessary to go through life harping on about it.

I feel strongly because I have a friend in exactly the same position as me who will not shut up about being "queer" and representing LGBTQ people at Pride and so forth and I think it's not right, it's insulting to lesbians.

I feel like the younger generation have to have a collection of labels to define themselves which they cling to through thick and thin.

TempestTost · 25/01/2025 14:56

I mean - as far as "why would bisexual people be excluded".

If you are talking about people trying to get some kind of law passed, for example, or a group looking to get a clinic started up, surely even bisexual people in a straight relationship might feel a strong interest in that?

It's the social stuff that seems more fraught, and I suppose the question is, what is the purpose of a sexuality specific social event where it's not about dating? Is it that you might all have shared experiences of being in a same sex relationship? Is it to not feel like others are judging you? Is it to have a group that doesn't have any men, or any women, there? Is it a group that's existed for a long time and it's about established relationships - (in which case what happens when a person goes from having a same sex partner to an an opposite sex one, they can't participate any more?)

There seems to be an element of, I feel these people are"my community." And not everyone feels that equally, there are plenty of gay and lesbian people who have no interest in any of that stuff, their social identity isn't invested in the community at all. Others on the other hand see it as deeply important.

But there could easily be people who, when younger, invest a lot of themselves in being part of that community - but later end up in an opposite sex relationship. If they've mainly seen their social life and identity being around that particular group though, I am sure it would feel like a loss and rejection to suddenly be unwanted.

adminicle · 25/01/2025 14:53

TempestTost · 25/01/2025 14:31

I mean they did not think of themselves as bisexual.

By that definition, I've identified as bisexual for over 30 years - basically since I realised I wasn't a lesbian.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/01/2025 14:53

MarieDeGournay · 25/01/2025 13:54

Tiddlywinkly · I've experienced a fair bit of bi phobia from both gay and straight people. It's a bit crap.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · Any forum conversation about bisexuality demonstrates the continued existence of biphobia. Including this one.

There you have it: biphobia is a real thing, it emanates from both lesbian and gay, and heterosexual people, neither L&G nor straight people experience it because they are not bisexual.
That seems to confirm that the experience of being bisexual is specific and different from being homosexual, so why LGB?

That seems to confirm that the experience of being bisexual is specific and different from being homosexual, so why LGB?

Because if I want to marry a woman, I should be able to as easily as if I want to marry a man? Bis have civil rights demands identical to lesbians and gays.

It's often social spaces, not political spaces, where the differences become apparent.

CoralHare · 25/01/2025 14:53

I am bisexual and in a long term heterosexual relationship. I think it’s probably just about people being sensitive to one another.

For example, people feel free to make homophobic remarks in front of me because they think I’m straight. That is pretty unpleasant to be honest. But it’s not same as getting abuse in the street when I hold hands with my OH. So if we were talking about abuse I would probably not want to take a prominent role is speaking about it in a group. But I might ask if anyone shared my experience and wanted to talk about it in a separate place/time (like how you feel if for your own safety you say nothing at the time and then feel horribly guilty!). It’s not the same but neither is it unrelated. A bit of mutual understanding and knowing when to be quiet (!) can be helpful.

MarieDeGournay · 25/01/2025 14:52

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/01/2025 14:44

It's a form of biphobia to think that a bi person who is currently in an mixed-sex relationship is out because they want to be special. We have the right to be honest about who we are.

It's coming across loud and clear: bisexual people experience bi phobia, bisexual people experience it from L&G and straight people, bisexual people 'have the right to be honest about who we are.'
Which confirms the idea that LG+B is not the ideal grouping as it includes different, though related, groups.

Icannoteven · 25/01/2025 14:48

This so one of the nastiest, most biphobic and small minded posts I’ve ever seen on mumsnet.

Being in a heterosexual relationship doesn’t change your sexuality. You are still attracted to both sexes. You’re history - your dating history and sexual history is still a mixed bag. And while bi people may pass as heterosexual while in opposite sex relationships, this ‘hidden was’ comes with issues of its own. People assume that you are straight and you can either go along with that and feel as if you are lying about yourself constantly, or correct them and be in a cycle of constantly coming out (and having people’s vision/ opinion of you change - not something that SHOULD happen in this day and age but something that does).

It sounds as if you think bi people in heterosexual relationships should just shut up and be invisible and have no say in gay rights/spaces etc? That they have no need to come together for support in common issues that they may experience?

Bi visibility is very important. Normalising bisexuality is important. Especially as an example to children/teens who are just discovering their sexuality. The reason I was so confused about my sexuality as a teen is because I didn’t know being bi was a valid option. I had no vision of what it looked like to grow up and be a bi adult. By being honest about our identity and sexuality, we can help future generations avoid this problem.

How unbelievably exclusionary of you to try and invalidate, hide and shut down a whole group of people talking and sharing their own experiences on the basis of who they have chosen to love.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 25/01/2025 14:44

HermioneWeasley · 25/01/2025 13:01

I am unusual in that I’m a bisexual woman married to another bisexual woman. We’ve been together decades. Everyone assumes we’re lesbians, which is fine, but I also feel guilty because there are men I fancy I don’t want anyone to think that lesbians are into men in any way because of a comment I might make about a celebrity. For all practical and legal purposes I’m gay - we weren’t able to get married before the law changed - we were defined by our same sex relationship. We experience homophobia, there are countries we can’t/won’t visit.

if I was in a long term relationship with a man I’d still be bisexual, but I don’t know why I’d be in LGB groups, clubs etc except as an “ally”. In the same way I don’t correct people now who assume I’m a lesbian, I can’t imagine being in a straight relationship and feeling the need to tell everyone I’m bisexual. It does feel like having all the benefits of being in a heterosexual relationship but wanting to be special.

It's a form of biphobia to think that a bi person who is currently in an mixed-sex relationship is out because they want to be special. We have the right to be honest about who we are.

MarieDeGournay · 25/01/2025 14:44

By the way, in Days of Yore when there were actual lesbian venues, we - us lesbians, or at least me and my pals - knew that there were bi women and straight women enjoying an evening of women-only company, and it mostly didn't bother us.

It did bother us a bit if we felt that there was a group of straight women who were watching us as if we were a different species - that did happen occasionally, but not often. And of course it got complicated if you were chatted up by/chatted up somebody you thought was a lesbian, because it was a lesbian venue/event, who turned out not to be.

My comments have been about groups organising around specific issues, not personal or social interactions.

LeopardSnow · 25/01/2025 14:43

You raise some interesting questions @Pluvia.

I agree with you that anyone straight coming along to an LGB event is off, but surely there are firm polite guardrails you can set around this without needing to exclude bi people? L,G and B are generally grouped together either because they all have same sex attraction, or because they all experience some of the same prejudices because they are same sex attracted. I don’t see how you can think bi people don’t fit into that group, unless you have totally different criteria?

Otherwise I don’t really agree.

For clarity, I am bi and married to a woman who I’ve been with for ten years and we have two kids together.

Your point about bi women in straight relationships not experiencing day to day prejudices because they pass as straight. Yes that’s probably true. But bi women do experience some of the same prejudices as lesbians, as well as some that are unique, some of which come from within the LGB community. Even women currently with men will have experienced these prejudices in the past and probably still experience some now if they are open about being bi.

So, why draw boundaries based on the level and kind of prejudice being experienced? This will also hugely differ within the lesbian community. Would a butch lesbian experience more casual homophobia than a straight looking one - yes of course? Would you say one has more right to be in your group than the other, no of course not, they are both welcome. If a straight woman chose to wear her hair very short and dress in a stereotypically lesbian way, and experienced homophobia, would she belong in your group? No of course not, she’s not same sex attracted.

Why let hostile bigots who dislike some people more than others, or make assumptions based on appearance, but ultimately still hate us all, determine who you let in?

By excluding bi women or distinguishing between acceptable bi women and unacceptable ones, you also risk doing real harm.

Coming to terms with being bi, is hard. A combination of compulsory heterosexuality and biphobia mean being bi is not an appealing prospect for many women young and old, and lots of bi women will consciously or unconsciously feel they should just be straight because it’s easier. They will feel even more like this if you exclude them from a setting where they could see women loving women being nice, normal and acceptable and tell them they are not welcome!! Compulsory heterosexuality also means plenty of women who will later identify as lesbians marry men. Are they not welcome in your group either?

You may think, well yes it is easier for bi women to just go out with only men, what is the harm. They have an easy option, so if they chose it they aren’t welcome in my group.

Would you say the same thing to someone saying it is easier to only date people the same colour as them, or the same religion, or the same social class - so they should flatten and repress any attraction or love they feel towards other people? I imagine not. Repressing or denying a part of yourself is damaging. As a teenager lesbian was a slur so when I felt crushes on girls I agonised over whether this meant I was one and used to lie awake at night visualising a hammer smashing into my head whenever I had sexual thoughts about girls. It took until I was 26 to accept that maybe it was okay to be interested in women too and I still feel some degree of self hatred about it now - because that’s how being part of a hated minority affects you - how much harder it is if that minority also excludes you. It takes many others longer to accept themselves, and many will end up with men, more if they feel excluded from the LGB world. Once I did come to terms with it, I had to content with loads of biphobia from lesbians who thought most bi women were unreliable, slutty, cheaters or in denial about being lesbians. From men who thought I was slutty, up for threesomes, or that it was a kink. And from straight women who thought I couldn’t be trusted around their husbands, or was doing it for attention.

Theuniversalshere1 · 25/01/2025 14:43

Mischance · 25/01/2025 14:24

What a shame we can't all just be people without needing labels.

Also this... I am just me. I happen to love.and spend my life with my wife to be.

I don't use my sexuality as ny identity, tend to be private in that regard.

I do get if it comes to more deeper social events etc why op has this issue.

However, I am a lesbian, i am a private lesbian, most wouldn't assume I am.

TempestTost · 25/01/2025 14:43

50 years ago is too recent, but it's absolutely true that the idea of a gay or lesbian person as an identity, as a type of person, is historically relatively recent. Historically it' also very unusual, and some of the most similar examples are some of the third sex categories for gay men that existed in some cultures.

In most cultures, even those where there were no real taboos around same sex sex (actually, probably especially those), it was just something that some people liked to do. It often wasn't exclusive from marriage and family life, either, which had much more utilitarian ends.

There is some thought that being gay and lesbian emerges as a social identity mainly where it is in some way suppressed. Otherwise it doesn't coalesce into the same kind of sense of a community apart from others.

From that perspective, the OP questions could be interpreted in terms of changes in the community as a result of more widespread acceptance of same sex oriented sexuality.

Theuniversalshere1 · 25/01/2025 14:39

JumpingPumpkin · 25/01/2025 14:38

I think it's probably more useful to talk about lesbian or gay relationships when it comes to bisexuality.

Assuming monogamy (most people) then a bisexual is, when in a relationship, in either a homosexual or heterosexual relationship. So a bisexual might be in a lesbian relationship but when in a relationship with a man they would be indistinguishable from any other heterosexual.

For the purposes of events involving the LGB, I don't think bisexual people in a heterosexual relationship qualify to be involved any more than any other heterosexual person. That is, they should take a step back unless any straight person could also sensibly be involved.

But that's just my opinion.

Exactly.

JumpingPumpkin · 25/01/2025 14:38

I think it's probably more useful to talk about lesbian or gay relationships when it comes to bisexuality.

Assuming monogamy (most people) then a bisexual is, when in a relationship, in either a homosexual or heterosexual relationship. So a bisexual might be in a lesbian relationship but when in a relationship with a man they would be indistinguishable from any other heterosexual.

For the purposes of events involving the LGB, I don't think bisexual people in a heterosexual relationship qualify to be involved any more than any other heterosexual person. That is, they should take a step back unless any straight person could also sensibly be involved.

But that's just my opinion.

Pluvia · 25/01/2025 14:37

Well, that's complicated matters, hasn't it? Is Tom Robinson currently partnered with a man or a woman? It was a woman last time I checked.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Robinson
Apparently not any more. But Robinson exemplifies a whole bunch of issues under discussion here.

Tom Robinson - Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Robinson

OP posts:
Theuniversalshere1 · 25/01/2025 14:37

MarieDeGournay · 25/01/2025 11:24

You raise some very interesting points. Every time I rail against the force-teaming of TQ++ with LGB, a little voice asks - and how did the 'B' get there?

The thing about being lesbian or gay is that you have a definite sexual orientation which shapes your relationships - not just your intimate relationships, but wider social relationships, as you say, Pluvia:
Things like the need to come out regularly to people who assume that we're in straight relationships, the slight but still palpable 'othering' that sometimes comes when people realise they're talking to someone who isn't just like them.

The addition of B to LGB is relatively recent, if you go back you'll see that organisations were ' 'Gay', and then after campaigning by gay women 'Lesbian and Gay'. At some point it just became 'Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual' - inevitably the L&G community had no say in this, and it was not without its critics at the time - not that we have anything against bisexual people, it's not the deep-seated objection to what the TQ++ stands for, and at least it is to do with sexual identity rather than madey-uppy stuff; but as a friend of mine commented back then about the sudden addition of the B: 'Sometimes they are straight and sometimes they are gay - so why do we represent them full time?'

It would be a welcome return to clarity if lesbian and gay issues were recognised for what they are - issues facing people with a homosexual sexual orientation.
Other sexual orientations exist, including heterosexual and bisexual, and all are 'worthy of respect ...' but they are not the same.

It is a cornerstone of FWR that women's rights should be respected as being about women, and this is not to suggest that other people's rights are less important. Similarly it can be argued that lesbian and gay rights should be respected as being about homosexual people.

I've just read some of the responses that have been posted since I started writing this (I have difficulty with finding words, and it takes me a long time to get my thoughts onscreen). I'm a bit shocked at the nastiness of the reply to the OP's thoughful post. Nobody's being 'fragile' or telling anybody to 'fuck off'.
Maybe engage with the issue rather than throwing around accusations like that?

This exactly.

Being bisexual in a same sex relationship isn't the same as being bisexual in. Hetero relationship.

Bisexuality is that, two differing sides dependent on how life pans out, then depends on differing views of others that needs the rights of lgbt.

So in a hetero relationship, viewed differently by society than in same sex relationship.

Totally different treatment by society as a Whole.
I get it op.

Pluvia · 25/01/2025 14:34

Sooz41 · 25/01/2025 14:23

I think there are a number of women who call themselves bisexual because they had an early heterosexual marriage with kids, and then later discovered same sex relationships and never looked back. In that context it can be easier to say bisexual than answer more questions from people.

I know an awful lot of women you describe, @Sooz41 I'm an older lesbian and without stopping to think I could name more than 20 women who fit the bill. But all of them describe themselves as lesbians and a lot of them are actively engaged in lesbian activism.

OP posts:
NoCarbsForMe · 25/01/2025 14:32

If you're bi in a straight relationship why would you want to go to lesbian events.

Also wondering why your straight male partner would want to attend.

CurlewKate · 25/01/2025 14:31

@TheCatsTongue "It's interesting that 50 years ago, straight people and gay people didn't exist. You were just a person who had same-sex relationships. There was no identity around it. Think of it more akin to hair or eye colour."
Where was it like this-Alpha Centauri?

TempestTost · 25/01/2025 14:31

adminicle · 25/01/2025 14:04

I do also wonder if there is an element with this, of people who in the past might not have "identified" as bisexual doing so now.

When you say 'identified', do you mean privately or publicly?

I mean they did not think of themselves as bisexual.

Swipe left for the next trending thread